LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Objectively intelligent. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=884)

Icky Thump 05-19-2021 10:02 AM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone (Post 531658)
It sounds like Pony may be representing the Q Shaman in his spare time:

“A lot of these defendants — and I’m going to use this colloquial term, perhaps disrespectfully — but they’re all fucking short-bus people,” Watkins told TPM. “These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

“But they’re our brothers, our sisters, our neighbors, our coworkers — they’re part of our country. These aren’t bad people, they don’t have prior criminal history. Fuck, they were subjected to four-plus years of goddamn propaganda the likes of which the world has not seen since fucking Hitler.”

No, sorry, I generally use that language to refer to my coworkers, plaintiffs' lawyers.

ETA, decent strategy for a jury though.

Hank Chinaski 05-19-2021 10:31 AM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone (Post 531658)
It sounds like Pony may be representing the Q Shaman in his spare time:

“A lot of these defendants — and I’m going to use this colloquial term, perhaps disrespectfully — but they’re all fucking short-bus people,” Watkins told TPM. “These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

“But they’re our brothers, our sisters, our neighbors, our coworkers — they’re part of our country. These aren’t bad people, they don’t have prior criminal history. Fuck, they were subjected to four-plus years of goddamn propaganda the likes of which the world has not seen since fucking Hitler.”

This is from a guy defending some insurrectionists?

Adder 05-19-2021 11:01 AM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone (Post 531658)
It sounds like Pony may be representing the Q Shaman in his spare time:

“A lot of these defendants — and I’m going to use this colloquial term, perhaps disrespectfully — but they’re all fucking short-bus people,” Watkins told TPM. “These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

“But they’re our brothers, our sisters, our neighbors, our coworkers — they’re part of our country. These aren’t bad people, they don’t have prior criminal history. Fuck, they were subjected to four-plus years of goddamn propaganda the likes of which the world has not seen since fucking Hitler.”

Dude's not wrong.

sebastian_dangerfield 05-20-2021 11:21 AM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone (Post 531658)
It sounds like Pony may be representing the Q Shaman in his spare time:

“A lot of these defendants — and I’m going to use this colloquial term, perhaps disrespectfully — but they’re all fucking short-bus people,” Watkins told TPM. “These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

“But they’re our brothers, our sisters, our neighbors, our coworkers — they’re part of our country. These aren’t bad people, they don’t have prior criminal history. Fuck, they were subjected to four-plus years of goddamn propaganda the likes of which the world has not seen since fucking Hitler.”

In this interview, which might qualify as some of the bleakest dark comedy ever, Watkins doubles down: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocP_5OS0rc0&t=4s

Hank Chinaski 05-20-2021 12:51 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 531662)
In this interview, which might qualify as some of the bleakest dark comedy ever, Watkins doubles down: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocP_5OS0rc0&t=4s

This is great, but it begs the question, is this post hoc rationalization for the original rant?

Adder 05-21-2021 01:26 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 531663)
This is great, but it begs the question, is this post hoc rationalization for the original rant?

Which of us was the grammar pedant?

Hank Chinaski 05-21-2021 07:53 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 531664)
Which of us was the grammar pedant?

1) I made a grammar error?

2) I have always been the second worse poster (not saying who is the worst) in typos and grammar. So when I would post to correct DTB or Ty or flower's grammar it is funny because I clearly have no room to criticize. Note, I would never criticize your grammar.

Adder 05-22-2021 08:33 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 531665)
1) I made a grammar error?

2) I have always been the second worse poster (not saying who is the worst) in typos and grammar. So when I would post to correct DTB or Ty or flower's grammar it is funny because I clearly have no room to criticize. Note, I would never criticize your grammar.

Dude, I’m the worst at grammar and usage and it’s not a contest.

In unrelated news, got a haircut for the first time since the pandemic and why don’t I have an attractive young lady rub my head at length more often?

LessinSF 05-22-2021 10:26 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 531666)
Dude, I’m the worst at grammar and usage and it’s not a contest.

In unrelated news, got a haircut for the first time since the pandemic and why don’t I have an attractive young lady rub my head at length more often?

Dude, just too easy.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 05-23-2021 06:50 AM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hank chinaski (Post 531665)
1) i made a grammar error?

2) i have always been the second worse poster (not saying who is the worst) in typos and grammar. So when i would post to correct dtb or ty or flower's grammar it is funny because i clearly have no room to criticize. Note, i would never criticize your grammar.

i'm number one!!! I'm number one!!!

Adder 05-29-2021 09:32 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Y’all remember when Sebby was up in arms that someone was claiming 45 wasn’t a “legitimate president” ‘cause of Russian interference, just like crazy Dems said about W?? Notice how he’s similarly up in arms about Rs who believe 45 actually won re-election? No? Huh.

Icky Thump 05-31-2021 07:02 AM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 531669)
Y’all remember when Sebby was up in arms that someone was claiming 45 wasn’t a “legitimate president” ‘cause of Russian interference, just like crazy Dems said about W?? Notice how he’s similarly up in arms about Rs who believe 45 actually won re-election? No? Huh.

Some good slogans for that R camp:

"Make America A Laughing Stock Again."
"From Worst to First to Worst Again"
"What has Joe done in 4 months other than return America to being a world leader?"

Tyrone Slothrop 06-01-2021 04:10 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E2zpmiQX...g&name=900x900

Pretty funny, actually.

pony_trekker 06-01-2021 05:27 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 531671)

Make sure to turn on your own every chance you get to show you’re being fair.

sebastian_dangerfield 06-03-2021 08:01 PM

Re: Objectively intelligent.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 531669)
Y’all remember when Sebby was up in arms that someone was claiming 45 wasn’t a “legitimate president” ‘cause of Russian interference, just like crazy Dems said about W?? Notice how he’s similarly up in arms about Rs who believe 45 actually won re-election? No? Huh.

1. I'm nuts busy.
2. I reply to every moron who claims that Biden didn't win with "Math."
3. The reply makes me happy because it alienates me from people I'd prefer to avoid. See #1.
4. You're still such a tool. Didn't Covid have any impact?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com