|  | 
| 
 Poster Boys Quote: 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Disco Stu never lies Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Poster Boys Quote: 
 | 
| 
 HOW TO LIE WELL? Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Plastic Spoon Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Poster Boys Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Various Quote: 
 Namaste. | 
| 
 Poster Boys Quote: 
 My folks never buy me clothes. I take everything they get me back. Navy? Fuck navy. Borrrrrring. | 
| 
 Poster Boys Quote: 
 | 
| 
 HOW TO LIE WELL? Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Disco Stu never lies Quote: 
 | 
| 
 text messaging Quote: 
 A music teacher carried on a 19-month sexual relationship with a boy she seduced when he was 11 years old, authorities said. The boy's mother became suspicious when she found sexually suggestive text messages on his cell phone, investigators said. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,107716,00.html | 
| 
 HOW TO LIE WELL? Quote: 
 (ii) Since I usually lie these days to get out of some fuckup or other, I've found acting really distressed/appologetic about the situation, while telling a story that makes it clear that absolutely nothing is my fault, is quite effective. (iii) best lying advice I ever got was from Dolores Clairborne. Before answering any question, breathe in and count to two. Gives your internal fact-checkers a moment to catch up and kick in. See also (iv) below on staying calm. (iv) Similar to "keep your hands at your side" and "don't touch your face/rub your neck," spend some effort to remain physically relaxed. (v) If someone starts picking around the truth, ride it out and play dumb. Stop for a minute, think about it, and then say you don't understand. With any luck they will think they are saying something stupid and drop it. (vi) my version of the George Costanza thing: reality is subjective. (Read more epistemology if you want backup for this position, or just hit the critical legal theorists.) If so, your "story" has no less validity than the "narrative" of any other witness to the same "factual" events. Therefore, you are not lying because you have an equal claim to the truth of your viewpoint, so believe. Only big or important lies are worth this much effort, though. Re: Sebby's "charm and dress sense" rant - I have to say that I have come to agree with him to a frightening degree (on this point). Even if you are some academic tax lawyer, appearance is, if not everything, a hugely disproportional factor (though the most effective "image" to project may vary from area to area). I've had experiences similar to his - I am totally outclassed, outsmarted, outprepared, whatever, but everyone thinks I'm the genius who is holding the whole thing together because I look calm, put together, and because I have sufficient charm/socialization/whatever to connect with the decisionmakers and am otherwise confidence inspiring. This is probably more important in general litigation and general transactional work than specialist work (patent, tax, benefits, etc., where people are looking to you for your specific trekkie-geek area of knowledge not some vague idea of "competence"), but even in that specialist work there is an image that you need to project to inspire the appropriate sort of confidence in whatever abilities the audience thinks valuable. Deal I was on not long ago - I was basically 4th chair (behind 2 partners here and the client's GC - I was probably on-par with the 2nd inhouse lawyer in terms of the pecking order on the deal). At least 2 of those people were considerably smarter, all were more experienced, and 3 of them had far better knowledge of the industry/deal type than me. But they were all what I would describe as "marginally socially unacclimated." The only one of them who wasn't a schlub in terms of either personality or appearance was a non-alpha male with a tendency to grovel. After the deal got done, though, who got the love letters from the client? Who was asked by the business guy to present a summary of the new project to the assembled client interdisciplinary project team? Who got the personal "thank you" letters from the board? That would be me, and it sure as hell wasn't based on the objective merit of my legal contributions (which were fine, but I definitely wasn't the brains behind the operation). The effect even extended to opposing counsel, whom I could charm into accepting our positions and distract from his (often justified) tirades with little more than my pretty ankles and a smile. I was, frankly, rather shocked by the whole thing - particularly how everyone "above" me on the pecking order accepted this as the natural order of things. I think a basically competent lawyer with fairly developed social/interpersonal skills (which necessarily include adjusting outward appearance to appeal to others) can trounce a brilliant, prepared, but ill-socialized lawyer about 80-90% of the time. Sad and scary, but I think it's true. I think this is somewhat like the "good school on the resume" thing - it, illogically and unfairly but very truly, has way, way more effect on how people perceive your abilities than it should, even in the face of evidence of your actual abilities. | 
| 
 HOW TO LIE WELL? Quote: 
 | 
| 
 My type of suit Red shirt, no pants or underwear, something sticking out of my ass:   http://home.tiscali.se/mysis77/puhbilder/spooh23.gif | 
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 PM. | 
	Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com