Originally Posted by John Phoenix (Post 425083)

One of my friends from college writes a blog in which she posted recently that her daughter is 16 months old and still is breast feeding. I want to host an intervention.

Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 425179)

http://darkstar.typepad.com/photos/ladies/boobs.JPG

Aren't you the one who likes underboob?

Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske (Post 425186)

[more serious post] that's not that long. I know someone who had a kid with a metabolic disorder who breastfed until 2 years. the disorder did not get diagnosed until 18 months, and breastfeeding was instrumental in keeping the child living. The interim attempt to address the issue, prior to diagnosis, almost put the child into liver fail. Of course, ymmv. [/more serious post]

Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 425164)

Will there be blow?

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 425110)

Could someone please enlighten me on the benefits of clam-digger pants? (Unless you're clam-digging)

Shorts are great when it's hot--your legs stay cool. Pants are necessary for climatic, professional, religious, or even aesthetic reasons.

But how do clam-diggers fit in? They don't maximize coolness, nor are they acceptable in providing warmth or appropriate coverage. They seem solely to function, at least as I've seen them around here, to highlight and accentuate cankles and over-sized calves. What am I missing?

Originally Posted by taxwonk (Post 425155)

And if you call this a whiff, I'm taking a blumpkin on your desk

Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske (Post 425190)

How do you feel about shants?

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 425158)

You're going to bring a hooker to Hank's office and have her blow you on his desk?

Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 425171)

Ohmygod. Take it to the decades ago politics board.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 425188)

Breastfeeding as a cure for liver failure? I find your ideas intriguing and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske (Post 425193)

This is not right neither. I expect more out of you (than Wonk, no offence)

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 425192)

They shant be worn in my company by any but the blind.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 425196)

Any less unright than your preposterous assumption the blumpkin has a placement rule?

Can you get a blumpkin in the forest? Yes. Yes you can. And if that holds, you can get one on Hank's desk.

Originally Posted by patentparanyc (Post 425198)

wtf is a blumpkin?

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 425196)

Any less unright than your preposterous assumption the blumpkin has a placement rule?

Can you get a blumpkin in the forest? Yes. Yes you can. And if that holds, you can get one on Hank's desk.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 425199)

Come on... You're the one who's seen Nickelback. It's cited in like, four of their songs.

Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske (Post 425200)

Personally, I want to be seated. And to avoid the mess, as I am not into messy scat, no offence, nttawwt, ymmv, I want a seat with a hole in it over a receptacle of some sort. In a not re-inventing the wheel sort of way a toilet seems like the ideal seat to accomplish this (and for me I like a ToTo with the seat warmer and warm water cleansing jet feature), although, I will admit, I have done the deed in an outhouse in the woods.....or is that just a lo-rent toilet?

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 425202)

Well that's all fine, but you don't make the definitions here. That's for urbandictionary.com, the Marquess of Queensbury Rules on this sort of thing. And they say Wonk on Hank's desk qualifies.

Originally Posted by patentparanyc (Post 425201)

gah. penske seems to have uh, nailed it ha ha. too lazy and too scared to google that. ack. is it anal after an enema or sounds like w/o one.

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 425112)

I think Trinny and Susannah called them one of fashion's deadliest sins. In other words, there are no benefits. They are singularly unflattering to everyone.

Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske (Post 425205)

Hi!

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 425212)

Once upon a time, there was one woman who could carry them off.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 425196)

Any less unright than your preposterous assumption the blumpkin has a placement rule?

Can you get a blumpkin in the forest? Yes. Yes you can. And if that holds, you can get one on Hank's desk.

Originally Posted by tmdiva (Post 425214)

What really bugs me is the conflation of capris, clam-diggers and pedal-pushers. Those used to all mean different things.

tm

Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske (Post 425200)

Personally, I want to be seated. And to avoid the mess, as I am not into messy scat, no offence, nttawwt, ymmv, I want a seat with a hole in it over a receptacle of some sort. In a not re-inventing the wheel sort of way a toilet seems like the ideal seat to accomplish this (and for me I like a ToTo with the seat warmer and warm water cleansing jet feature), although, I will admit, I have done the deed in an outhouse in the woods.....or is that just a lo-rent toilet?

Originally Posted by tmdiva (Post 425214)

Except those are cigarette pants, not clamdiggers. But you're right, you have to be really thin.

What really bugs me is the conflation of capris, clam-diggers and pedal-pushers. Those used to all mean different things.

Originally Posted by tmdiva (Post 425214)

Except those are cigarette pants, not clamdiggers. But you're right, you have to be really thin.

What really bugs me is the conflation of capris, clam-diggers and pedal-pushers. Those used to all mean different things.

tm

Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske (Post 425197)

:(:o

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive (Post 425220)

I wear capri pants quite a lot. I like them for the temps here (60-70) when shorts wouldn't be quite warm enough and pants are too warm (or I'm riding my bike). I think you have to have reasonably long legs to carry them off (otherwise they make your legs look even shorter than they are), but I don't think they are unflattering. Clamdiggers are the ones that hit right below the knees, right? Those are definitely hard to pull off, even for the long-legged.

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 425212)

Once upon a time, there was one woman who could carry them off.

Originally Posted by tmdiva (Post 425214)

Except those are cigarette pants, not clamdiggers. But you're right, you have to be really thin.

What really bugs me is the conflation of capris, clam-diggers and pedal-pushers. Those used to all mean different things.

tm

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 425221)

Shareholders of the Penske brand, I give you this report of assets.

Penske Account: 11,234 (active 4/10/2003 to 6/10/2005)
Penske_Account: 11,623 (active 3/31/2003 to 1/12/2010)
Penske Material: 24 (active 5/6/2004 to 5/23/2007)
PresentTense Pirate Penske: 2,742 (11.52 per day since 10/01/2009)

I ask each of you to consider your own post counts, and to ask yourself: "Am I giving Penske enough things to respond to? Could I be doing more to fill the gaping maw of his need to reply to things?"

Thank you.

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 425224)

I'm not sure of the difference between clam diggers and pedal pushers, but this is approximately the length I'm talking about:

http://media.rei.com/media/uu/b6eb48...c72743266e.jpg

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 425218)

She could wear a burlap sack on each leg, and I would still hump the bejeezus out of her.

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 425225)

I think I contribute plenty to the effort, but, what I find amzing, is that Penske_Account has only just passed Penske Account. How can this be?

I also don't think this is the full report of assets. Dig deeper.

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 425225)

I think I contribute plenty to the effort, but, what I find amzing, is that Penske_Account has only just passed Penske Account. How can this be?

I also don't think this is the full report of assets. Dig deeper.

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 425226)

I think it's obvious that Flower can pull those off. No one else, but they're fine for Flower.

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 425221)

Shareholders of the Penske brand, I give you this report of assets.

Penske Account: 11,234 (active 4/10/2003 to 6/10/2005)
Penske_Account: 11,623 (active 3/31/2003 to 1/12/2010)
Penske Material: 24 (active 5/6/2004 to 5/23/2007)
PresentTense Pirate Penske: 2,742 (11.52 per day since 10/01/2009)

I ask each of you to consider your own post counts, and to ask yourself: "Am I giving Penske enough things to respond to? Could I be doing more to fill the gaping maw of his need to reply to things?"

Thank you.

Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske (Post 425232)

Two of those are not me and the post number attributed to one of them is erroneous and a set up by a former Admin ([cough]slave[cough]), without naming names. Seriously.