LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03 - 10-3-03 (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8)

paigowprincess 04-09-2003 03:23 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by barely_legal
Do you take everything literally? The point is that I never actually had the PMs forwarded to me, but M-R is so paranoid that I'm sure he assumes I did. And do you really think she forwarded them to people with the heading "Isn't this guy psycho" and then told him that she forwarded his messages with the heading "Isn't this guy psycho?"

The reason his post is funny is because he obviously sent her some insulting pms, and then freaked out b/c she asked on the board how to forward PMs. Well, that's why I think it's funny. And I have no beef with M-R at all, I actually like him. I'm just trying to help him sound like less of a dumbass. That is my mission in life.
THe beauty of it is that I posted the How Do I Forward PMs post for the sole purpose of freaking MR out. Like I cant figure out where a forward button is?

He is a mental midget. I crush his head (thanks str8). Crush crush crush.

purse junkie 04-09-2003 03:24 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I have some questions for you. Are you a glutton for punishment? Do you not realize you're not talking to an actual person? Is it possible that almost everyone on this board (Sparklehorse and SD notwithstanding) except you, knows that any interaction with it is a pointless and annoying? What kind of answer do you think it will give you to your question? Why do you care?

You are worse than it is, in that it is intentionally annoying us while you unintentionally annoy us by giving it honest responses.

Enough already.

TM
It wasn't an 'honest comment.' I just couldn't resist.

Just skip over posts as soon as you're aggravated. With the exception of this one, I usually do.

leagleaze 04-09-2003 03:24 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
THe beauty of it is that I posted the How Do I Forward PMs post for the sole purpose of freaking MR out. Like I cant figure out where a forward button is?

Can I tell you how relieved I am to know this? I was a little scared about that one. I am sitting there shaking my head thinking what the fuck, how can she not see the fucking forward button.

Replaced_Texan 04-09-2003 03:25 PM

Another RT link.
 
http://www.trevorvanmeter.com/flyguy/ (random flash guy who you can make fly around)

paigowprincess 04-09-2003 03:26 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
So far she seems to be ignoring you. I gather this is what you were expecting.
Are all these sebastian_dangerfield is on your ignore list posts about me and to me? ALL of them? What a mental midget. I crush Sebby's head. Crush crush crush

Now stop embedding his posts in yours. It ruins the effect. I was enjoying the peace and quiet.

barely_legal 04-09-2003 03:26 PM

Dealbreakers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
I can see where you're going with this, and will merely tell you that you should NOT go get knocked up just for the cool HC tags.
Would it be weird to admit that I've fantasized about having a baby and giving it up for adoption so that I can take the 3 months paid maternity leave?

shut up. like you haven't all fantasized about the same thing!

soup sandwich 04-09-2003 03:26 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I have some questions for you. Are you a glutton for punishment? Do you not realize you're not talking to an actual person? Is it possible that almost everyone on this board (Sparklehorse and SD notwithstanding) except you, knows that any interaction with it is a pointless and annoying? What kind of answer do you think it will give you to your question? Why do you care?

You are worse than it is, in that it is intentionally annoying us while you unintentionally annoy us by giving it honest responses.

Enough already.

TM
I applaud your efforts, but I'm sure by now you know the pattern:

inflammatory post
arguments
gets less responses
reasonable posts
normal discussion
inflammatory post
etc.

People always respond, either out of ignorance or because they just can't help themselves.

purse junkie 04-09-2003 03:31 PM

Dealbreakers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by barely_legal
Would it be weird to admit that I've fantasized about having a baby and giving it up for adoption so that I can take the 3 months paid maternity leave?

shut up. like you haven't all fantasized about the same thing!
Hell, I'd fantasize having an employer that paid for anything, first.

p(have never fantasized about anything having to do with babies that didn't include avoiding having one)j

andViolins 04-09-2003 03:31 PM

Quick question for JFF
 
Quote:

Originally posted by lawyer_princess
What size panties do you wear?
Oh great. See now I have this creepy image of Sean Young (panties + package) from Ace Ventura: Pet Detective running through my head.

Thanks.

aV

robustpuppy 04-09-2003 03:33 PM

Dealbreakers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by barely_legal
Would it be weird to admit that I've fantasized about having a baby and giving it up for adoption so that I can take the 3 months paid maternity leave?

shut up. like you haven't all fantasized about the same thing!
Ya, that would be a great fantasy for me if three months' paid maternity leave did not entail not taking a vacation day or sick day for, oh, about 2.8 years.

Atticus Grinch 04-09-2003 03:34 PM

Another RT link.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
http://www.trevorvanmeter.com/flyguy/ (random flash guy who you can make fly around)
Loved that link. Word to the wise: As in real life, don't touch the copier.

ThurgreedMarshall 04-09-2003 03:38 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I would date a deaf chick (and would definitely date a def chick). When I said something stupid, she could just pretend she didn't hear me.
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
I'd think it's the other way around -- that's why a deaf chick would be willing to date YOU.

It's something of a low ambition as dating strategies go, but hey, whatever works.
And this week's winner of the "Incapable of reading a post in any way other than literally" goes to...you. Congratulations.

And to preempt your next post, there really isn't going to be an award.

TM

former gov't 04-09-2003 03:45 PM

Dealbreakers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by TexLex
I really hate people who use h/c tags who aren't entitled to it - makes me want to yell at people who look perfectly healthy. And I might, but for the persistant fear that they might actually have some horrible heart condition which, if yelled at, would cause them to drop dead.

My new grocery store however, has like, 50% h/c spaces and I have to park far far away from the store, which I do not like. I know the number is regulated, but damn - there are never 30 disabled persons there at once - even on Saturdays.

They also have preggo spaces, but I won't be applying to get a tag until I'm huge and obvious, if then (seems kind wussy).

-TL
Posting to this late - but you don't need a plate for a preggo space - purely voluntary (at least in my state) whereas H/C spaces are mandatory. Hey park in a preggo space - nothing says how far along you have to be or make you take a test to prove it (also no fine involved).

Mister_Ruysbroeck 04-09-2003 03:46 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by barely_legal
Do you take everything literally? The point is that I never actually had the PMs forwarded to me, but M-R is so paranoid that I'm sure he assumes I did. And do you really think she forwarded them to people with the heading "Isn't this guy psycho" and then told him that she forwarded his messages with the heading "Isn't this guy psycho?"
Um, barely, I never said the PMs were forwarded to you. I never mentioned your name at all. It was an attempted dig at paigow, and nothing more.

Replaced_Texan 04-09-2003 03:48 PM

Another RT link.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Loved that link. Word to the wise: As in real life, don't touch the copier.
The eel gives quite a shock too.

ThurgreedMarshall 04-09-2003 03:48 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Never have I seen a "blame the victim" mentality so clearly articulated.

:box:
Shhh. Either JFF or paigow will hear you and I'll instantly become a rapist or rapist apologist.

As for actually blaming the victim, you got it wrong. WE are the victims. PJ is the accesory after the fact.

TM

former gov't 04-09-2003 03:48 PM

Dealbreakers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by barely_legal
Would it be weird to admit that I've fantasized about having a baby and giving it up for adoption so that I can take the 3 months paid maternity leave?

shut up. like you haven't all fantasized about the same thing!

If you're going to put your body through that go the surrogate route - get money for a trainer and Carribean vacation after the birth. (Although I think that was popular in late 80s early 90s and most states may now prohibit the $$$ for baby thing).

barely_legal 04-09-2003 03:50 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
Um, barely, I never said the PMs were forwarded to you. I never mentioned your name at all. It was an attempted dig at paigow, and nothing more.
You're missing the point again. Don't send pms to someone you don't know and are currently engaged in a flame war with unless you expect them to be made public. The word "private" in "private message" isn't a contract.

To illustrate, TM just sent me this PM (I am holding good on my promise to post insulting PMs to me all of over the board):

"Shut up, you little-breasted, big bootied, gay man dating, paigow befriender."

So there -- the PRIVATE message isn't really private after all -- Mooohahahahahahaha -- I win! ;)

purse junkie 04-09-2003 03:53 PM

Dealbreakers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by former gov't
If you're going to put your body through that go the surrogate route - get money for a trainer and Carribean vacation after the birth. (Although I think that was popular in late 80s early 90s and most states may now prohibit the $$$ for baby thing).
Well, there's generally an exception for reimbursement for 'medical expenses.' Which purely coincidentally seem to run really, really, really high. I say put the trainer and Caribbean vacation under "postnatal care!"

Replaced_Texan 04-09-2003 03:59 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by barely_legal
You're missing the point again. Don't send pms to someone you don't know and are currently engaged in a flame war with unless you expect them to be made public. The word "private" in "private message" isn't a contract.

To illustrate, TM just sent me this PM (I am holding good on my promise to post insulting PMs to me all of over the board):

"Shut up, you little-breasted, big bootied, gay man dating, paigow befriender."

So there -- the PRIVATE message isn't really private after all -- Mooohahahahahahaha -- I win! ;)
I have no dog in this fight and I could care less about the actual content of it, but I would consider it pretty bad form to forward an e-mail or PM or IM conversation to a third party without the sender's permission. Simple internet etiquette. I’d assume that the community in which the correspondents participate would be well served to know that one of the parties is prone to forward private communications, so the rest of the community can weigh that factor in when deciding whether to communicate with that party off line or not.

ThurgreedMarshall 04-09-2003 04:01 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by barely_legal
To illustrate, TM just sent me this PM (I am holding good on my promise to post insulting PMs to me all of over the board):

"Shut up, you little-breasted, big bootied, gay man dating, paigow befriender."

You betrayed my confidence! How could you?

Thurgreed(gattigap, i sent her that pm knowing full well she would post it)Marshall

Not Bob 04-09-2003 04:07 PM

Hockey predictions
 
So, I ended up getting a *sweet* deal on tickets for the Rangers playoff game at MSG, and ..... uh, what's that you say?

Seriously, I give you the following hockey predictions:[list=1]Colorado wins the West. Patrick Waaaaaaaaah will avenge that game seven loss last year.

The Senators will make it past the Isles.

The Flyers will not be able to consistently protect Mister Bean in the playoffs, and they will not generate enough offense to get past the Leafs. Owen Nolan scores more than Slave at a drunken FB get-together, and Belfour stops Amonte and Roenick.

More after the first games are played.[/list=1]

Not (hit someone!) Bob

barely_legal 04-09-2003 04:12 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I have no dog in this fight and I could care less about the actual content of it, but I would consider it pretty bad form to forward an e-mail or PM or IM conversation to a third party without the sender's permission. Simple internet etiquette. I’d assume that the community in which the correspondents participate would be well served to know that one of the parties is prone to forward private communications, so the rest of the community can weigh that factor in when deciding whether to communicate with that party off line or not.
I agree with you somewhat, and I wouldn't forward a pm that I received from someone who wanted to communicate something personal to me in private (which is why I haven't posted the PM Thurgreed sent me about his fears that he might be gay b/c he really really loves Clay). But if someone were to PM me out of the blue to insult me (I'm not saying that's what MR did -- I have no idea what the pms were about b/c I wasn't on the aforementioned vaulted forward list) I would not feel like it was a betrayal to share them with other people.

So everybody in this community be warned -- I've done it already today and I will do it again! Insult me in private at your own peril!

Tyrone Slothrop 04-09-2003 04:15 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Thurgreed(gattigap, i sent her that pm knowing full well she would post it)Marshall
He's running a conflicts check to see if he can pitch to represent someone other than Penske here.

TexLex 04-09-2003 04:20 PM

Dealbreakers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by former gov't
Posting to this late - but you don't need a plate for a preggo space - purely voluntary (at least in my state) whereas H/C spaces are mandatory. Hey park in a preggo space - nothing says how far along you have to be or make you take a test to prove it (also no fine involved).
I know. You must have missed this:
Quote:

Originally posted by TexLex
No, they're not legally binding - you have to get a little stork tag from the store, as I understand it, or they will shake their fists at you and tell you off.

-TL

Mister_Ruysbroeck 04-09-2003 04:23 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by barely_legal
You're missing the point again. Don't send pms to someone you don't know and are currently engaged in a flame war with unless you expect them to be made public. The word "private" in "private message" isn't a contract.
I'm not missing the point. I learned that lesson a couple days ago.

However, that doesn't make forwarding PMs any less shitty especially when they have nothing to do with the people they're being forwarded to. In this case, I was trying to address something I saw as a personal issue between me and paigow, and she decided to involve other people. To me, that's shitty.

In my mind, if someone takes up an issue they have with me in private, I wouldn't make that coversation public, even if I thought the person was off his or her rocker. Not because I am bound not to take it public, but because, in actuality, the person is showing a bit of discretion by addressing things in private and I appreciate that level of discretion. I mean, maybe there was a miscommunication and the person just wanted an explanation. Should other people be involved in that case?

Now, if the person is doing nothing more than flinging insults, then there should be no expectation of privacy, but that's not what happened here. While my tone may have been a bit confrontational, all that happened was that Paigow said something that made me wonder and I asked her about it in private. That made me a psycho, I guess, and justified sending around the "crazy" PMs she got from me.

In the end, I acknowledge this whole thing was all my fault. I should have known that paigow is incapable of using discretion when addressing personal matters.

edited: I see you posted something I agree with, namely, that if the PM is purely an insult, you run the risk of being exposed as a spineless jerk, but that isn't what happened with me and paigow.

Gattigap 04-09-2003 04:27 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
He's running a conflicts check to see if he can pitch to represent someone other than Penske here.
Nah. (Though you should see my pitch materials!)

Truth be told, I have mixed feelings about my representation of Penske. Sure, there was the glare of the spotlight. There were the courthouse press conferences in Seattle, NYC, LA, SF, Houston, Minneapolis, Tokyo and Beijing. There was that opportunity to smack down that prima donna David Boies. (God, that felt good). There were the girls, the booze, the drugs, the cavorting in mounds of mismatched footwear. Boy, the stories I could tell.

But though fame is sweet, it is also fleeting. And god knows, it don't pay the bills (PenskeBucks(tm) are not considered legal tender outside of the 4th Avenue Starbucks, it appears).

So I've decided not to expand this little loss leader, and instead keep the bulk on my practice on something more practical and lucrative, like insurance coverage.

soup sandwich 04-09-2003 04:29 PM

Hockey predictions
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Bob
I give you the following hockey predictions:

The Flyers will not be able to consistently protect Mister Bean in the playoffs, and they will not generate enough offense to get past the Leafs. Owen Nolan scores more than Slave at a drunken FB get-together, and Belfour stops Amonte and Roenick.

I'm not sure who Mister Bean is, but I'm sure once the Flyers figure out who he is Hitchcock will come up with a way to protect him. Flyers in 5. In my heart I think they will sweep, but I don;t want to be too much of a homer. They are too deep and the Leafs are too banged up.

jeezlouise 04-09-2003 04:37 PM

Dealbreakers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sparklehorse
I thought you were going to post the one about the woman who didn't smile in her pictures because she didn't have teeth.
What, you don't like gum-jobs?

j(feeling very wicked this afternoon)l :devil:

SlaveNoMore 04-09-2003 04:39 PM

Hockey predictions
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Bob
So, I ended up getting a *sweet* deal on tickets for the Rangers playoff game at MSG, and .....
That is just fucking low.

not(amused)7yS

SlaveNoMore 04-09-2003 04:43 PM

Hockey predictions
 
Quote:

soup sandwich
...I don't want to be too much of a homer...
Look pal, we don't care one iota about your sexual orientation.

Hockey fandom is a "big tent"

not7y(everyone is Canadian)S

paigowprincess 04-09-2003 04:49 PM

A variation on my favorite stupidity defense
 
the classic "I was kidding" comeback. "It as an attempted dig at x". I didnt mean it literally.

Quit while youi are not THAT far behind. No pun.

Quote:

Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
Um, barely, I never said the PMs were forwarded to you. I never mentioned your name at all. It was an attempted dig at paigow, and nothing more.

paigowprincess 04-09-2003 04:53 PM

Hockey predictions
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Bob
So, I ended up getting a *sweet* deal on tickets for the Rangers playoff game at MSG, and ..... uh, what's that you say?

Seriously, I give you the following hockey predictions:[list=1]Colorado wins the West. Patrick Waaaaaaaaah will avenge that game seven loss last year.

The Senators will make it past the Isles.

The Flyers will not be able to consistently protect Mister Bean in the playoffs, and they will not generate enough offense to get past the Leafs. Owen Nolan scores more than Slave at a drunken FB get-together, and Belfour stops Amonte and Roenick.

More after the first games are played.[/list=1]

Not (hit someone!) Bob
Apropos of nothing, but Not Bob, your avatar looke like how I imagine you to look. Sort of Wink Martindale meets the second Darrin from Bewitched meets Fred MacMurray

paigowprincess 04-09-2003 04:57 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by barely_legal
I agree with you somewhat, and I wouldn't forward a pm that I received from someone who wanted to communicate something personal to me in private (which is why I haven't posted the PM Thurgreed sent me about his fears that he might be gay b/c he really really loves Clay). But if someone were to PM me out of the blue to insult me (I'm not saying that's what MR did -- I have no idea what the pms were about b/c I wasn't on the aforementioned vaulted forward list) I would not feel like it was a betrayal to share them with other people.

So everybody in this community be warned -- I've done it already today and I will do it again! Insult me in private at your own peril!
MR PMed me to ask me a bizarrely paranoid question. When I told him it was a bizarrely paranoid question, he insluted me. I am not a forwarder by nature as I hate when people do that shit to me. But if any of you ever ask me a bizarrely paranoid questino and then proceed to insult me on PM for pointing out that your question is bizarrely paraniod, I reserve the right to forward the PM.

I hope that this does not violate any internet etquette.

robustpuppy 04-09-2003 04:58 PM

A variation on my favorite stupidity defense
 
Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
the classic "I was kidding" comeback. "It as an attempted dig at x". I didnt mean it literally.

Quit while youi are not THAT far behind. No pun.
Oh come on now. If I could handle your heat and were willing to flame you, I might say that this is your favorite stupidity defense because you also like to use it yourself.

Oh, right, I know, it was intended to be self-deprecating.

Hang around on these Boards long enough and anything that you say will be packaged as the "classic [ineffective response]".

paigowprincess 04-09-2003 04:59 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
I'm not missing the point. I learned that lesson a couple days ago.

However, that doesn't make forwarding PMs any less shitty especially when they have nothing to do with the people they're being forwarded to. In this case, I was trying to address something I saw as a personal issue between me and paigow, and she decided to involve other people. To me, that's shitty.

In my mind, if someone takes up an issue they have with me in private, I wouldn't make that coversation public, even if I thought the person was off his or her rocker. Not because I am bound not to take it public, but because, in actuality, the person is showing a bit of discretion by addressing things in private and I appreciate that level of discretion. I mean, maybe there was a miscommunication and the person just wanted an explanation. Should other people be involved in that case?

Now, if the person is doing nothing more than flinging insults, then there should be no expectation of privacy, but that's not what happened here. While my tone may have been a bit confrontational, all that happened was that Paigow said something that made me wonder and I asked her about it in private. That made me a psycho, I guess, and justified sending around the "crazy" PMs she got from me.

In the end, I acknowledge this whole thing was all my fault. I should have known that paigow is incapable of using discretion when addressing personal matters.

edited: I see you posted something I agree with, namely, that if the PM is purely an insult, you run the risk of being exposed as a spineless jerk, but that isn't what happened with me and paigow.
MR, you have finally flipped your wig. You have fallen into my little trap and do not know whether I have forwarded the PMs or not and will never know bc I like to toy with your little brain.

Andif you continue to mischaracterize your psycho PMs, I may have to make my policy retrospective and post the PMS here to boot. You are welcome to post my responses by the way. I dont think I said anything I was ashamed of. But then, I would never PM someone to say something totally mortifying to me. THats just stupid.

spookyfish 04-09-2003 05:02 PM

Hockey predictions
 
Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
Apropos of nothing, but Not Bob, your avatar looke like how I imagine you to look. Sort of Wink Martindale meets the second Darrin from Bewitched meets Fred MacMurray
Are you implying that Wink Martindale and Fred MacMurray were also gays? NTTAWWT

spookyfish

ThurgreedMarshall 04-09-2003 05:03 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
When I told him it was a bizarrely paranoid question, he insluted me.
You did this by yourself long ago.

TM

paigowprincess 04-09-2003 05:05 PM

A variation on my favorite stupidity defense
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Oh come on now. If I could handle your heat and were willing to flame you, I might say that this is your favorite stupidity defense because you also like to use it yourself.

Oh, right, I know, it was intended to be self-deprecating.

Hang around on these Boards long enough and anything that you say will be packaged as the "classic [ineffective response]".
Dont get touchy bc you used it yourself a few days ago.

robustpuppy 04-09-2003 05:06 PM

MBA inspired question:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
You did this by yourself long ago.

TM
TM, I can just picture your reaction when you read that line. Did you rub your hands together in glee?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com