LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03 - 10-3-03 (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8)

NotFromHere 08-05-2003 06:16 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by blueballs
freaks of Hollyweird.

fruits and nuts slammin hot wife old pooper sleazy bellhop.
Kobe's wangdoodling
marraige vows

Next time, please write in English. And your buddy Hill was on Leno last night - didja see her?

NotFromHere 08-05-2003 06:18 PM

Who knew Pandas were sleazy?

LOS ANGELES, Aug 5 — Bai Yun, a giant panda on loan to the San Diego Zoo from China, is expected to deliver twins sometime this month, zoo officials said Monday. Because panda pregnancies can vary in length by as much as three months, zookeepers don’t know exactly when the babies will be born — or who their father is.


Panda sluts

I can say this because I don't think that sexual harassment panda cruises this board.

notcasesensitive 08-05-2003 06:21 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Austintatious
He's a total hedonist.

I am not surprised he stepped outside the marriage, though his wife is young and hot. The surprise is that he decided having a rolling menage was the way to go.

This has been going on for months now.
So, fyi, fwiw, if you search "rolling menage" on Google, there do not appear to be any work-appropriate websites that come up. nttawwt. Well, the IT folks might think so, but I don't.

That said, I don't know what a "rolling menage" is.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 08-05-2003 06:24 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Really, is it more stupid to have a threeway? If the dude's gonna cheat, he may as well shoot the moon. Hell, the extra partner should be a mitigating factor - you know, he wouldn't have cheated but for the opportunity of a THREEWAY.

(I think the gentlemen of the jury, at least, may buy it)
Absolutely. The second girl just might JUSTIFY it. "But honey, it was THREE-WAY! Do you know how long I've wanted that? Are you trying to prevent me from reaching my dreams?"

Austintatious 08-05-2003 06:24 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
That said, I don't know what a "rolling menage" is.
By "rolling menage," I meant that he is having an on-going menage with these two chicks from work.

He is such a dumbass.

Flinty_McFlint 08-05-2003 06:30 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
Your friends are weird.

I still think you should have told him last night to end the affair, stick with his wife and kids, and just suck it up.

My advice was to tell him "You are the least important person in this situation." The most important people are those little girls and his wife.
Which little girls are you referring to? Because depending on your answer, I either agree wholeheartedly or vehemently disagree.

Flinty

Shape Shifter 08-05-2003 06:31 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Austintatious
By "rolling menage," I meant that he is having an on-going menage with these two chicks from work.

He is such a dumbass.
Au contraire. He is positively reptilian.

The work thing is a little much, though. It's one thing to fish in the company pond. But when you reach the limit, you've got to catch and release.

greatwhitenorthchick 08-05-2003 06:31 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Austintatious
By "rolling menage," I meant that he is having an on-going menage with these two chicks from work.

He is such a dumbass.
Over and above anything else, your friend is a dumbass for having an ongoing menage with two chicks from work. I don't think that is particularly bright, unless he works in a place where three-ways with co-workers are common and unlikely to cause work-related problems.

Bad_Rich_Chic 08-05-2003 06:33 PM

How Would Jesus Park?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
1. I don't think (and never said that) Americans are hyper-sensitive.
No, that was me.

The whole point about the "piss taking" thing is that it ISN'T done just among friends and family - it may be done by casual acquaintances and virtual strangers in the pub, or your mortal enemy in the workplace, and the victim is fully expected to suck it up and take it like a man and smile like they like it. It's not really about insults or name calling, it is completely about making jokes at someone else's expense to their face and seeing if you can draw blood. If it doesn't actually hurt, you lose. If the vic can brazen it out with a good face on it, they win.

Actually, I want to take a moment to lament the fading of the great NYC tradition of copping attitude. Used to be the city's official sport, though most NYers would only engage in it if they thought you were another NYer, knowing outlanders didn't get it. Since the 11th, only about twice have I heard strangers get into some good old fashioned attitude-flinging name-calling. It's like everyone's afraid we're going to scare the fucking tourists. It's what they came to see, people!! Alas for the time when a 300 pound black woman sitting on a 115 pound man on the subway (sat right the hell on him, we thought he was dead, he actually had to be pulled out from under her by the people next to them 'cause she wasn't getting up again) grumbling about how "you stand UP when a lady needs a seat, you stand UP" barely rated a special mention.

Quote:

2. I do not see British behaviour as some kind of model of behaviour to be emulated. Did you see them when Diana died - there is a lot of repressed emotion over there just dying for an outlet.
Actually, I think that was primarily an example of the british succumbing to US-style Jerry-Springer hysteria. Someone commented at the time that any American in London must have felt like the crack pusher in the school yard.

Quote:

There are good things to be said about American culture - and sometimes good things to be said about having a stiff upper lip.
True, true. Give me plumbing and a sense of humor, dental care and tea 'n McVitties at 4.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 08-05-2003 06:33 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds


My advice was to tell him "You are the least important person in this situation." The most important people are those little girls and his wife.
Yeah, but what about his kids?

Edited to add that Flinty partly beat me to it

NotFromHere 08-05-2003 06:34 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
Over and above anything else, your friend is a dumbass for having an ongoing menage with two chicks from work. I don't think that is particularly bright, unless he works in a place where three-ways with co-workers are common and unlikely to cause work-related problems.
Hey it happens on Cinemax all the time. "I'd like to see how well you work with my secretary."

evenodds 08-05-2003 06:34 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Flinty_McFlint
Which little girls are you referring to? Because depending on your answer, I either agree wholeheartedly or vehemently disagree.

Flinty
I know that Austin's friend has two daughters. I was referring to those little girls, who should be the only consideration.

LessinSF 08-05-2003 06:36 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
... unless he works in a place where three-ways with co-workers are common and unlikely to cause work-related problems.
In-house at Vivid. Now that is my dream job, followed closely by in-house at Private, Extreme and for Suze.com, not necessarily in that order

NotFromHere 08-05-2003 06:38 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
I know that Austin's friend has two daughters. I was referring to those little girls, who should be the only consideration.
Flinty, the sarcasm switch must be in the "up" position for those who are sarcasmically challenged.

greatwhitenorthchick 08-05-2003 06:51 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by LessinSF
In-house at Vivid. Now that is my dream job, followed closely by in-house at Private, Extreme and for Suze.com, not necessarily in that order
Do you think that is the case? I know people that worked in house at tobacco companies and were literally showered with cigarettes, but with a porn place I wonder if a lawyer would be considered a boring old necessarily evil and not necessarily worthy of receiving fringe benefits. I am not sure why I'm under this impression.

This is not to imply in any way that Lester is a boring old necessarily evil (although it can take him up to 2 hours to tell one story - but that does not make him boring, or old.).

Sidd Finch 08-05-2003 06:55 PM

men & women & women
 
Is there anything not obvious about this?

Does anyone look at this situation and think "hmm..... two kids, one a newborn, and he's nailing two women he works with..... sounds like a great idea to me!!!"?

Does anyone think "this is something men dream about the world over. Forget the kids, forget the wife -- an ongoing threesome is a higher calling!"?

Or, have we finally found something we can all agree on?

Aloha Mr. Learned Hand 08-05-2003 06:56 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by LessinSF
In-house at Vivid. Now that is my dream job, followed closely by in-house at Private, Extreme and for Suze.com, not necessarily in that order
I hear you, Lester. They all need a "Custodian of Records" for the age verifications and stuff... No offense, but you might need to adopt a different Nom de Plume for the movie credits, though. MoreinSF??

Flinty_McFlint 08-05-2003 06:58 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
Flinty, the sarcasm switch must be in the "up" position for those who are sarcasmically challenged.
My bad. But it's good to know E/O hasn't learned to read me yet, that will come in handy at the poker table....mwahahhhahaha.

Flinty ("Up") McFlint

SlaveNoMore 08-05-2003 07:00 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

LessinSF
In-house at Vivid. Now that is my dream job, followed closely by in-house at Private, Extreme and for Suze.com, not necessarily in that order
I know I sent you that link for the in-house job with Scores.

not7y(only after I didn't get it)S

LessinSF 08-05-2003 07:15 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
Do you think that is the case? I know people that worked in house at tobacco companies and were literally showered with cigarettes, but with a porn place I wonder if a lawyer would be considered a boring old necessarily evil and not necessarily worthy of receiving fringe benefits.
Rightly or wrongly, I picture it as a cross between Hunter S. taking his attorney everywhere and introducing him and the pool parties in "Boogie Nights."

Penske_Account 08-05-2003 07:24 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Is there anything not obvious about this?

Does anyone look at this situation and think "hmm..... two kids, one a newborn, and he's nailing two women he works with..... sounds like a great idea to me!!!"?

Does anyone think "this is something men dream about the world over. Forget the kids, forget the wife -- an ongoing threesome is a higher calling!"?

Or, have we finally found something we can all agree on?
Yes.

OTOH, maybe Austintatious is Lady Val's sock and 3somes are a new code word for depos. Go figure.

LessinSF 08-05-2003 07:26 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
I know I sent you that link for the in-house job with Scores.
I was dinged for not having enough chest hair, skin color, or bad jewelry. What's your excuse?

Penske_Account 08-05-2003 07:27 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by LessinSF
Rightly or wrongly, I picture it as a cross between Hunter S. taking his attorney everywhere and introducing him and the pool parties in "Boogie Nights."
My research indicates that this is more or less correct. No pun intended.

Penske_Account 08-05-2003 07:29 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by LessinSF
I was dinged for having enough chest hair, skin color, or bad jewelry. What's your excuse?
Assuming you meant to say "not having", I'm now officially pissed at Slave for not sending me the link.

I have the chest hair. He knows strange girls call me swarthy and bad jewelry I can purchase for the interview.

Bastard!

AngryMulletMan 08-05-2003 07:30 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
It's one thing to fish in the company pond. But when you reach the limit, you've got to catch and release.
Fishing in the company pond is stupid for oh so many reasons, even if the tool wasn't married.

And you've got your flyfishing metaphors a little messed up. Catch and release has no "limit". But if you're fishing to take the damn fish out of the pond, you've got a strict limit. When the tool got married, he took himself out of the catch and release sport by definition and he ought not be nymphing, barbless hook or not.

And if that sounds like I'm judging the guy, I was.

str8outavannuys 08-05-2003 07:46 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Really, is it more stupid to have a threeway? If the dude's gonna cheat, he may as well shoot the moon. Hell, the extra partner should be a mitigating factor - you know, he wouldn't have cheated but for the opportunity of a THREEWAY.

(I think the gentlemen of the jury, at least, may buy it)
Sadly, the only jury that really matters here is male-free.

That said, I agree with Shape Shifter. If you're going to do cheat, going for the 3-way increases the benefit side of the cost-benefit analysis. The only downside, I suppose, is that you potentially lose some deniability (he said/she said vs. he said/both of those sluts said) if you want to claim that the whole sordid affair never took place.

But as a leading pro-FMF supporter, I gotta give a little nod to Austin's friend, especially if he'd never had the chance before he got married. Sadly I'll have no such fallback. :(

Penske_Account 08-05-2003 07:50 PM

oh what a tangled web
 
Quote:

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
Sadly, the only jury that really matters here is male-free.

That said, I agree with Shape Shifter. If you're going to do cheat, going for the 3-way increases the benefit side of the cost-benefit analysis. The only downside, I suppose, is that you potentially lose some deniability (he said/she said vs. he said/both of those sluts said) if you want to claim that the whole sordid affair never took place.

But as a leading pro-FMF supporter, I gotta give a little nod to Austin's friend, especially if he'd never had the chance before he got married. Sadly I'll have no such fallback. :(
My advice is negotiate the possibility for controlled extramarital sex, incl. a 3 way, before you sign on the dotted line.

Its all about communication. If you are open and up front about your kinky carnal desires and, hopefully, you pick a spouse who respects your needs, these little dalliances shouldn't be a problem.

Its like the Bill-Hill thing.

Just remember to be safe out there.

Penske_Account 08-05-2003 07:53 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
Dabney Eats It

ps: I googled that phrase, so I'm down wit it, as the kids say, but, notwithstanding such knowledge, everytime I see it, I think of that Dagney chick.

Am I alone here?

str8outavannuys 08-05-2003 07:58 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by blueballs
That's easy, its due to the culture of orgiastic adultery championed by the freaks of Hollyweird.

You don't have to look far to see the example that is set by the role models that the fruits and nuts of the media capital of the world thrust unto us. Take Kobe Bryant for example. He has a slammin hot wife who I'd bet has no problem giving him access to the old pooper, but instead he looks to backdoor some sleazy bellhop.

Although, in fairness, I shouldn't put the downfall of the institution of marriage solely on Kobe's wangdoodling, he's only the latest in a very long line of adultery supporters including Hugh Hefner, Larry Flynt, Bob Guccione, Harry Blackmon, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Bella Abzug, Gloria Steinem, Patty Ireland, Elizabeth Taylor, Roseanne Barr, Bill Clinton and many other free love, no responsibility types who have infected the American culture with the notion that partners are disposable and marraige vows are only as good as the paper on which they are written.

Sad. Its one thing to be single and sow your seeds, but to disrepect a holy union is just plain wrong. At least your friend will provide some work for a divorce attorney.
Saying the reason that 'men want to gook two women at once is because of Hollywood' has supplanted your "TV is lousy in 2003" as the supidest-ass post of the year. I note that after this ridiculous blanket statement, your supporting argument actually has nothing at all to do with FMF threesomes, but rather, MF adultery. (Blaming famous people for the prevalence of adultery is also pretty stupid). Bien fait!

The reason men want to bang multiple women at once is because IT FUCKIN ROCKS, not because Hollywood (or more accurately, pornos and contemporary hip hop music) says it's cool. The reason men want to shtup women who are not their wives is a) the thrill of conquest and b) the inherent pleasure of having variety in women outweighs, for many, the costs of not being monogamous.

str("Hollyweird" is not and was never an amusing bon mot)8

AngryMulletMan 08-05-2003 08:08 PM

oh what a tangled web
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
My advice is negotiate the possibility for controlled extramarital sex, incl. a 3 way, before you sign on the dotted line.

Its all about communication. If you are open and up front about your kinky carnal desires and, hopefully, you pick a spouse who respects your needs, these little dalliances shouldn't be a problem.

Its like the Bill-Hill thing.

Just remember to be safe out there.

Good point. Since nobody said anything about the Texas tool's wife knowing about or supporting his rolling menage, I got the impression that this was not an open marriage issue.

OTOH, I am not at all suggesting that Austin should drop the tool as a friend just because he did a slimy thing. It would all depend on the context of the revelation - "Hey, I banged two chicks at once, heh, heh." vs "I did this thing I need to talk to somebody about because it shook me up." I think it depends on whether the tool thought it was a bad thing or not and that is dependent, of course, on whether his wife was ok with it, which I got the impression she was not.

str8outavannuys 08-05-2003 08:08 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Yeah, but what about his kids?

Edited to add that Flinty partly beat me to it
No, he TOTALLY beat you to it, and captured a POTD to boot. But you've had your fair share of good ones too 'Trane. No shame getting beat to the punch by a flinty Scotsman who could probably use a few bob.

NotFromHere 08-05-2003 08:15 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
Saying the reason that 'men want to gook two women at once is because of Hollywood' has supplanted your "TV is lousy in 2003" as the supidest-ass post of the year. I note that after this ridiculous blanket statement, your supporting argument actually has nothing at all to do with FMF threesomes, but rather, MF adultery. (Blaming famous people for the prevalence of adultery is also pretty stupid). Bien fait!

The reason men want to bang multiple women at once is because IT FUCKIN ROCKS, not because Hollywood (or more accurately, pornos and contemporary hip hop music) says it's cool. The reason men want to shtup women who are not their wives is a) the thrill of conquest and b) the inherent pleasure of having variety in women outweighs, for many, the costs of not being monogamous.

str("Hollyweird" is not and was never an amusing bon mot)8
1) Why are you yelling at a sock?
2) Maybe you missed the memo, but bang and shtup have been OK'd by the board, but gook is out. Please use gyz, giz, jiz, jyz, jizz, gizz or ghisz (I never did get the official spelling - str8 - you're the spelling guy - let me know what the true spelling of gizz is).

idle acts 08-05-2003 08:23 PM

Hooray, Hooray, Hooray!
 
Episcopal Church Confirms First Openly Gay Bishop:

www.msnbc.com/news/947847.asp?0cv=CA01

ias_39 08-05-2003 08:24 PM

The Doctor is In
 
Originally posted by BB

Quote:

<re shin splints> lift your heels
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore

Quote:

For 5 cents, this is the advice I get? Thanks Lucy.
sparklehoarse is right re stretching, shoes that suit your over/underpronation &c, and soft surfaces. The biggest thing for my money though is working your way up slowly. It's boring yes, but there it is. One other thing is that you can do some exercises with surgical tubing tying your foot to a table leg to strengthen the muscles on the front of your shin.

str8outavannuys 08-05-2003 08:26 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
1) Why are you yelling at a sock?
2) Maybe you missed the memo, but bang and shtup have been OK'd by the board, but gook is out. Please use gyz, giz, jiz, jyz, jizz, gizz or ghisz (I never did get the official spelling - str8 - you're the spelling guy - let me know what the true spelling of gizz is).
I think there's a >30% chance that blueballs is not a sock.
And if I wanna use gook, ima use gook. From your list I'd go with jizz (v.) or jism (n.).

W.W.L.D. 08-05-2003 08:31 PM

Did Anyone Attend?
 
Larry Flynt's prayer service for the death of Bill O'Reilly.

Alex_de_Large 08-05-2003 08:39 PM

Hooray, Hooray, Hooray!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by idle acts
Episcopal Church Confirms First Openly Gay Bishop:

www.msnbc.com/news/947847.asp?0cv=CA01
that's pretty cool. us Catholics can't even ordain a woman yet...

BHB

W.W.L.D. 08-05-2003 08:43 PM

men & women & women
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
ps: I googled that phrase, so I'm down wit it, as the kids say, but, notwithstanding such knowledge, everytime I see it, I think of that Dagney chick.

Am I alone here?
I think of principal Edward R. Rooney, as played by Jeffrey Jones (who has his own little demons with which to deal).

Atticus Grinch 08-05-2003 08:53 PM

He would have an enormous schwanstucker. Or not.
 
German penises 'too small for EU condoms'

Apparently, fifteen really is their limit on schnitzengruben.

ias_39 08-05-2003 09:16 PM

men & women & women
 
Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick

Quote:

with a porn place I wonder if a lawyer would be considered a boring old necessarily evil and not necessarily worthy of receiving fringe benefits.
Less might be able to work it. An ex-accountant for White Zombie, Death Row Records &c, used to party wild with bands. Of course, it didn't end well. Suge Knight allegedly forced the accountant to sign a confession for embezzling millions.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com