LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03 - 10-3-03 (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8)

paigowprincess 08-06-2003 03:35 PM

Slot C Action
 
Quote:

Originally posted by mmm3587
I'm in the position (which I always thought would be great, but it's really not) of dating a girl who is really into Slot C action. She had never tried it before me and gave all the standard "No, that's disgusting" lines, but I asked her to give it a try, once. Now she loves it, and she wants to do that all the time.

It is becoming tiresome. First of all, it can require some clean-up sometimes. Second of all, I don't even get much Slot B action now before she is begging me, and I paraphrase here "Give me some Slot C Action." The first few times, I found this very hot in a porn kind of way, but now I dread hearing "Depo me in Slot C." This is all coupled with the fact that she is one of those women who is not really orgasmic. Tab A, Slot B, Slot C, Tab D, nothing is effective. But she really enjoys it and she wants sex all the time. So, I have to depo her for a really long time, until I just give up. Finally, and I think that this is the worst part, is that she is a clencher. As soon as she gets anywhere close to having orgasms, she starts to clench around the pleasure providing implement. This isn't really relevant to Slot C action, but it makes it very hard to continue normal activity for everything else.

I'm at a loss for how to deal with this. I used to be really attracted to her, but now I kind of dread depoing her. I've tried to talk to her about this, but it doesn't do any good. Even though I've told her I'm not that into it anymore, she still wants it Slot C-style. She also doesn't masturbate, so it's hard for me to figure out what is going to cause her to have orgasms.

I probably should make this anonymous, but it's not like I ever talk about this stuff with people I know. It's just a lot to share all at once.
Total TM violation but I am between crazy phone calls. And not good crazy in the paigow sense. But I thought clenching (ie snapping) was good? And that all the ladies clenched when they came bc of muscle contractions?

Connect_the_Dots 08-06-2003 03:40 PM

Slot C Action
 
Quote:

Originally posted by mmm3587
I'm in the position (which I always thought would be great, but it's really not) of dating a girl who is really into Slot C action. She had never tried it before me and gave all the standard "No, that's disgusting" lines, but I asked her to give it a try, once. Now she loves it, and she wants to do that all the time.
***
It is becoming tiresome...now before she is begging me, and I paraphrase here "Give me some Slot C Action."

***

Even though I've told her I'm not that into it anymore, she still wants it Slot C-style. She also doesn't masturbate, so it's hard for me to figure out what is going to cause her to have orgasms.

Cry me a fuckin' river, dude. Do you hear this [making weird finger motion by your ear]? It is the world's smallest violin and it is playing for you. We should all have your problems. Be careful what you wish for b/c you might get it. A stich in time, saves nine. A bush in your hand is worth two something something.

Do you get what I am getting at here?

No?

That is because you are not smart enough to understand what I am saying, just like you are not smart enough to understand how lucky you are to have a girl who not only tolerates, but actually requests, that you go spelunking in the dingleberry cave with your purple-helmeted recon ranger.* If you are not ranger enough to get the job done, then send Debtslave, errr, I mean "your girlfriend" over and I will make it my duty to please that booty.


*translation = she likes you to insert your penis into her dingleberry cave.

taxwonk 08-06-2003 03:42 PM

How Would Jesus Park?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
For example, this idea that it insults the sanctity of premarital shacking up to try to introduce a single person in a "committed relationship" to other singles is recockulous. We're more paternalistic about committed unmarried relationships than we are about married ones.
Quite true. I know that I, for instance, still look upon weddings and funerals as one of my few remaining socially sanctioned opportunities for random hookups and drunken sex.

Them, and trips to DC.

paigowprincess 08-06-2003 03:46 PM

How Would Jesus Park?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Quite true. I know that I, for instance, still look upon weddings and funerals as one of my few remaining socially sanctioned opportunities for random hookups and drunken sex.

Them, and trips to DC.
so burgre finally gave it up?

Connect_the_Dots 08-06-2003 03:49 PM

Slot C Action
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
Discuss with her the joys of double penetration and introduce a new toy into the mix. You get to use Slot B, she gets fun with Slot C.
You are indeed wiser than Aristotle.

bilmore 08-06-2003 03:49 PM

Kobe and Stuff
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Anyway, in addition to mike tyson's defense that "any woman would want it with me, and beg me for it" . . .
Oh, and here I thought the Tyson defense was "well, at least I didn't bite off her fuckin' EAR!"

W.W.L.D. 08-06-2003 03:50 PM

Kobe and Stuff
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Anne Elk
I have not been following this closely, but the SO just called to share the following:

Kobe and the victim acknowledge consensual sex, in the traditional Tab A into Slot B context. The problem arose when Kobe attempted to insert Tab A into Slot C.
And don't miss Kobe accepting his award (previously taped footage) for Favorite Male Athelete at the Teen Choice Awards, tonight on Fox. And if that is not enough, Kelly Clarkson will perform (don't forget the olive oil).

W.W.L.D. 08-06-2003 04:05 PM

Another Personal Check to a Hooker?
 
Jerry Springer (required link) drops out of the race for Ohio senator.

What will become of his new informercial ?

Shape Shifter 08-06-2003 04:07 PM

No Slot C Rippage
 
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/Sp...ing030806.html

Bad_Rich_Chic 08-06-2003 04:08 PM

How Would Jesus Park?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
You are so full of shit, it's hardly even funny. Blah blah blah
Dude, please tell me that my sarcasm alarm is failing. 'Cause is mine isn't, yours sure as fuck is.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 08-06-2003 04:09 PM

No Slot C Rippage
 
. . . . that's been leaked, at least.

ltl/fb 08-06-2003 04:12 PM

No Slot C Rippage
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
. . . . that's been leaked, at least.
The defense could always argue that it was due to Olestra, anyway.

Atticus Grinch 08-06-2003 04:14 PM

In Like Flynt
 
Quote:

Originally posted by LessinSF
The only part of his platform I really disagree with - http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...5/MN259959.DTL - is the tax on slot machines is too high; it would deter too many players.
The subsequent posts finally helped me understand the dubious board topicality of Larry Flynt wanting to tax slots.

barely_legal 08-06-2003 04:15 PM

No Slot C Rippage
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
. . . . that's been leaked, at least.
source, please?

edited to add: and ew.

Puft Daddy 08-06-2003 04:17 PM

Another Personal Check to a Hooker?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by W.W.L.D.
Jerry Springer (required link) drops out of the race for Ohio senator.

If this is accurate, it is disappointing on so many different levels.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 08-06-2003 04:18 PM

No Slot C Rippage
 
Quote:

Originally posted by barely_legal
source, please?

edited to add: and ew.
Anne Elk will have to provide that.

My point was only that the article, based on sources, didn't mention Slot C. That hardly proves Slot C never came into play.

Sparklehorse 08-06-2003 04:19 PM

In Like Flynt
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
The subsequent posts finally helped me understand the dubious board topicality of Larry Flynt wanting to tax slots.
Speaking of Larry Flynt, I can't believe this hasn't been posted already: Larry Flynt is being sued for sex toys in the dishwasher at work

barely_legal 08-06-2003 04:21 PM

No Slot C Rippage
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Anne Elk will have to provide that.

My point was only that the article, based on sources, didn't mention Slot C. That hardly proves Slot C never came into play.
ahhh, got it. I misunderstood, I thought there was some late breaking news (pardon the pun).

I can't believe I have espn.com bookmarked. For legal news.

W.W.L.D. 08-06-2003 04:23 PM

Better Than Britney
 
Kate Moss will supposedly appear completely nude in the upcoming issue of W magazine and without the aid of airbrushing (presumably to avoid looking "lumpy").

SlaveNoMore 08-06-2003 04:24 PM

Bennifer and J-Fleck
 
Drudge is now reporting that "Gigli" - released less than a week ago - is now averaging less than $185 PER SCREENING.

That's what - like 20 tickets per show?

This is clearly much more than a bad film. This is major public backlash against two hacks of dubious talent that have been slammed down our collective throats by the publicity machine.

And nothing is more fun to watch than a sinking ship.

not7yS

notcasesensitive 08-06-2003 04:25 PM

In Like Flynt
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sparklehorse
Speaking of Larry Flynt, I can't believe this hasn't been posted already: Larry Flynt is being sued for sex toys in the dishwasher at work
It is because you have been designated by the board as "Link Poster For All Sex Toy-Related Litigation Stories". Did you not get the memo? I was a little bit surprised you were so lax in your duties yesterday, but since you got the link posted today, I will let it slide. Bygones.

Atticus Grinch 08-06-2003 04:28 PM

Bennifer and J-Fleck
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
And nothing is more fun to watch than a sinking ship.
Having seen "Titanic," I disagree.

Edited to add: Holy shit, I'm turning into Bilmore.

W.W.L.D. 08-06-2003 04:29 PM

Bennifer and J-Fleck
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Drudge is now reporting that "Gigli" - released less than a week ago - is now averaging less than $185 PER SCREENING.

That's what - like 20 tickets per show?

This is clearly much more than a bad film. This is major public backlash against two hacks of dubious talent that have been slammed down our collective throats by the publicity machine.

And nothing is more fun to watch than a sinking ship.

not7yS
Sony Pictures has already pulled the TV ads.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 08-06-2003 04:31 PM

Bennifer and J-Fleck
 
Quote:

Originally posted by W.W.L.D.
Sony Pictures has already pulled the TV ads.
I was a bit amazed that they actually were able to come up with two quotes from movie reviewers that were actually positive for the print ads.

Of course, the quotes were probably out of context. Or from Sony's in-house staff of movie reviewers.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 08-06-2003 04:32 PM

Bennifer and J-Fleck
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch

Holy shit, I'm turning into Bilmore.
Yeah, but I'm Bilmore in 15 years.

Gattigap 08-06-2003 04:32 PM

Bennifer and J-Fleck
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Drudge is now reporting that "Gigli" - released less than a week ago - is now averaging less than $185 PER SCREENING.

That's what - like 20 tickets per show?

This is clearly much more than a bad film. This is major public backlash against two hacks of dubious talent that have been slammed down our collective throats by the publicity machine.

And nothing is more fun to watch than a sinking ship.

not7yS
The interesting part is that he's got a nifty chart that shows the daily receipts and the percentage change from day to day. While not high in the first place, the receipts are dropping like a stone.

Impressive indeed.

paigowprincess 08-06-2003 04:33 PM

Bennifer and J-Fleck
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Drudge is now reporting that "Gigli" - released less than a week ago - is now averaging less than $185 PER SCREENING.

That's what - like 20 tickets per show?

This is clearly much more than a bad film. This is major public backlash against two hacks of dubious talent that have been slammed down our collective throats by the publicity machine.

And nothing is more fun to watch than a sinking ship.

not7yS
given the size of theaters in the malls of suburbansprawl america, twenty tix per show is surprisingly high. especially in the middle of the week. people want to see a trainwreck?

I think if these two had been a little less complacent, show offy and I am still Jenny from the block despite my pink soliataire, the schadenfreude would be just at Madonna or Courtney Love levels. But these two assholes have to remind us all the time how in love they are and how much they make and about their fifteen million dollar house off of Savannah and the diamond. Talk about money for nothing.

ltl/fb 08-06-2003 04:33 PM

Bennifer and J-Fleck
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
nothing is more fun to watch than a sinking ship.
With this sinking ship, I'd rather read reports about it than have to sit through it.

ThrashersFan 08-06-2003 04:37 PM

Bennifer and J-Fleck
 
Quote:

Originally posted by W.W.L.D.
Sony Pictures has already pulled the TV ads.
There were ads? Have they pulled previews too?

I still believe that this one could make some bucks in video release. There are probably a lot of people who will rent it just to see how much it sucks. It may also become a hit with the college crowd who will get all fucked up and give it the Mystery Science Theater treatment.

paigowprincess 08-06-2003 04:39 PM

Bennifer and J-Fleck
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
There were ads? Have they pulled previews too?

I still believe that this one could make some bucks in video release. There are probably a lot of people who will rent it just to see how much it sucks. It may also become a hit with the college crowd who will get all fucked up and give it the Mystery Science Theater treatment.
Much like Mr DTB, I am so annoyed by these two that I wont give em a dime of my hard earned bling. I think J-ho is gonna start thinking being in jail with Puff DAddy looked like a stay at Paradise Hotel after what happens to her career from here.

Sparklehorse 08-06-2003 04:42 PM

In Like Flynt
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
It is because you have been designated by the board as "Link Poster For All Sex Toy-Related Litigation Stories". Did you not get the memo? I was a little bit surprised you were so lax in your duties yesterday, but since you got the link posted today, I will let it slide. Bygones.

Er, I was too busy looking through the Good Vibrations catalogue for, uh, mmm3587's girlfriend, um, to read my memos.

bilmore 08-06-2003 04:42 PM

Bennifer and J-Fleck
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch

Holy shit, I'm turning into Bilmore.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Yeah, but I'm Bilmore in 15 years.
My work here is done.

bilmore 08-06-2003 04:45 PM

Bennifer and J-Fleck
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
There were ads? Have they pulled previews too?

I still believe that this one could make some bucks in video release. There are probably a lot of people who will rent it just to see how much it sucks. It may also become a hit with the college crowd who will get all fucked up and give it the Mystery Science Theater treatment.
Ten years from now, sophs will be getting together in the dorms for Evil Dead/Gigli parties.

notcasesensitive 08-06-2003 04:50 PM

In Like Flynt
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sparklehorse
Er, I was too busy looking through the Good Vibrations catalogue for, uh, mmm3587's girlfriend, um, to read my memos.
Well, for the record, your full title is -- Link Poster For All Sex Toy-Related Litigation Stories And Vice President In Charge Of Disclosing Blind Date Horrors

Leagl will forward your job description to you shortly.

mmm3587 08-06-2003 04:53 PM

Slot C Action
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sparklehorse
I suggest something similar, which is to get her a good vibrator and play with it together, encourage her to take some solo flights and report back, and so on.
Evenodds' suggestion and this one are both good, but it almost seems like too much work. I mean, it doesn't seem to bother her that she doesn't have orgasms. Which is actually the part that bothers me. And now, I'm thinking, why I am going to run around doing all this stuff when she doesn't even care. And how would I buy a vibrator? That's the kind of thing women, even non-orgasmic ones, are supposed to buy for themselves.

Shape Shifter 08-06-2003 04:53 PM

Bennifer and J-Fleck
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Drudge is now reporting that "Gigli" - released less than a week ago - is now averaging less than $185 PER SCREENING.

That's what - like 20 tickets per show?

This is clearly much more than a bad film. This is major public backlash against two hacks of dubious talent that have been slammed down our collective throats by the publicity machine.

And nothing is more fun to watch than a sinking ship.

not7yS
I am still around. I am trying to find a way to respond to all of the misinformation about Gigli on this site and still act my way out of a paper bag.

Go figure out how many audience members have left other movies over the last five years and see what results you get. People leave films for all kinds of reasons. Some leave for a lifestyle change. Some leave to do plaintiff's work. Some leave because they are asked to do so and theatres do a good job of being very graceful about that fact so as to allow them to find other enjoyment. It is silly to conclude that every moviegoer who left Gigli did so as a result of a "gobble gobble". The truth is that they are in the minority by a very signficant margin and that we did everything we could do to avoid them for as long as we could do so.

Do you think the other films will be able to withstand the recession and continue to employ unproductive costars, and if so, to what end and for how long? Consider the fact that Gigli did not reduce star salaries. As has been well reported in the entertainment press, we took a hit to profits instead. Many films in our position did not do the same thing.

Finally, I have no desire to fight you nor do I have any reason to wish you any harm. I am glad you and others are asking some good questions and I appreciate the opportunity to respond to some of them. But, personal attacks are unwarranted and I do not condone some of your abusive language. Recall that I came to this board to respond to some incorrect information posted about me on it.

For those who really want to know more about Gigli, I am happy to be a resource. To those who have some sort of grudge against me or our film, I am sorry, but nothing I can write here is going to change that. It does sadden me that are a few people who would like to see more folks at Gigli lose their jewelry because they appear to be rejoicing at any bad news about our film. That is unfortunate because our film has worked hard to do some good things in this community.

Give us a few months, Gigli will not only manage to keep the lights on here, but we will light up the night sky.

Love,

Ben(XLDOG)Lo

paigowprincess 08-06-2003 04:55 PM

Bennifer and J-Fleck
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
My work here is done.
See ya at Bilmore's burger shack in Jamaica. I will look for the guy in the chaps.

leagleaze 08-06-2003 04:56 PM

In Like Flynt
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Well, for the record, your full title is -- Link Poster For All Sex Toy-Related Litigation Stories And Vice President In Charge Of Disclosing Blind Date Horrors

Leagl will forward your job description to you shortly.

Ok, I refuse to write a job description for this.

That's just silly. But keep up the good work.

mmm3587 08-06-2003 04:57 PM

Slot C Action
 
Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
Total TM violation but I am between crazy phone calls. And not good crazy in the paigow sense. But I thought clenching (ie snapping) was good? And that all the ladies clenched when they came bc of muscle contractions?
What is a TM violation? Anyway, I should have defined clenching better. Not internal clenching, external clenching. As in, legs clenching and pushing together in tradition Tab A - Slot B action, hands forcing head in further and knees crushing my chest in Tab D - Slot B action and her hand pushing my hand and thighs crushing my hand in good ol' Tabs E through I - Slot B action.

The other kind of clenching is heavenly; hers makes me feel like I'm dying against a steel fench at a Real Madrid match.

ltl/fb 08-06-2003 04:58 PM

Slot C Action
 
Quote:

Originally posted by mmm3587
And how would I buy a vibrator? That's the kind of thing women, even non-orgasmic ones, are supposed to buy for themselves.
In case it wasn't clear from the nevermind, this is the last nail in the coffin of my recent ill-advised crush.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:31 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com