LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03 - 10-3-03 (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8)

Bad_Rich_Chic 08-11-2003 05:12 PM

Cape Cod Wedding Fashion
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
When I stop hyper-ventilating, I may muster a response.
I'm better now.

Child [those already bored with this harangue should now scroll on], there is no such thing on god's green earth as "semi formal." Sensible people only tolerated "black tie optional" so long as black tie was acknowledged to be informal

Very traditionally, there were two styles of recognized dress: formal and informal (obviously, people wore less formal things to actually work in, but they changed out of that for anything resembling a social occasion, be it dinner with the family, religious services or a coronation, so those working clothes didn't matter because social acquaintances didn't impose them on each other). For daytime (and we speak only of gentlemen, because, other than very vague guidelines, the distinctions between formal and less formal clothing for women has been and remains whatever she chooses to make of it), this meant morning suits or sack suits (basically, what we now call a business suit, but the trousers didn't necessarily match the jacket). For evening, that mean white tie or, interchangeably, dark business suits or black tie. Actually, I lie - for evening there was a third choice of formality, which was "we're not dressing," which meant whatever you wore in the morning (so long as it was a business suit) or, if you were in your own home, a dressing gown.

More recently (meaning middle to late 20th century), for daytime the business suit graduated to formal, while "informal" meant ... god only knows what, but usually what used to be considered the working clothes you wouldn't inflict on a friend, or worse. Sometimes a sack coat (often with darker or stripey trousers and a contrasting vest) occupied a level of formality between the "formal" business suit and the formerly-formal now uber-formal morning suit, which itself survived only in certain private schools and the diplomatic corps. For evening clothing, black tie graduated from informal to formal, white tie graduated upwards to the orchestra pit or "formal-no really formal we really mean it, white tie", informal came to mean the business suit, and a new category of "casual" was invented to cover everything else because after 1970 no one dared to say "we're not dressing."

Then everyone confused "informal" with "anything other than formal" and therefore with "casual," and anarchy ensued.

For weddings, everyone is supposed to dress with the same level of formality as the groom. The invitation is supposed to signal to the invitees what level of formality that will be: a third person, centered, formal invitation means "formal," and "informal" is signaled by a handwritten letter invitation, which can then get into the details of expected dress if that is deemed necessary.

Fugee 08-11-2003 05:19 PM

The Cat Slippery Slope
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
The last three came in a group. All kittens, two brothers and an unrelated boy who was feral -- I couldn't let them be killed, could I? ....Does having six kitties really make me borderline nuts?
It does not make you borderline nuts per se but it does increase the chances that when the next group of stray kittens comes along you will decide you can't let them be killed either and so on and so on until you have 67 cats and the health department comes to take them away and commit you.

Shape Shifter 08-11-2003 05:20 PM

The Cat Slippery Slope
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
Okay, now I gotta be serious for a moment. Are they really selling flip flops for anything except wearing in the shower at the club or summer camp? Are people wearing them? I have seen a couple of teens with flippies on but I thought perhaps they were just rebelling against society. Flip flops? Really? Also, I did notice capris pants on my assistant and the executive secretary -- I explained, in a semi nice way, that capris pants are only for young girls (which they are not) and, in any event, not for women with stubby legs (which they both have) and not for the office (which we were all in at the time). Also, today, my assistant (who is a little bit older than I am) wore a pant and shirt combo that bared a wee little sliver of belly -- but her belly is neither wee nor little. Do I just leave the issue alone or do I tell her that pears should not expose belly skin?
I am not sure where you would wear these, but they would please several fetishists at once.

http://store.nordstrom.com/product/p...tyleID=2818123

(spree: scratch & sniff flip flops)

tmdiva 08-11-2003 05:21 PM

Mormon hypo
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Seven of Nine

Eh?

I know of no male Mormons who are actually opposed to Polygamy. Indeed, I don't know of any female Mormons who oppose consensual Polygamy.

Indeed, most of them actually believe that there're seven levels to heaven, and that the only way a woman can get into heaven is if her husband gets there first and ushers her in. Otherwise, presumably, she has to chill out in some sort of ethereal bullshit waiting room. Thereafter, the wife can only get to the level of heaven one below that of her husband. So, by allowing polygamy, vast new numbers of women would be virtually guaranteed salvation (albeit at an N-1 plateau) through their beneficent husbands...

In my opinion, this is as bad as the "72 Virgins in Heaven" bullshit proclaimed for Jihad crusaders.

Seven

Wow. You are completely full of shit.

And I dare say I know more Mormons than you do.

tm

purse junkie 08-11-2003 05:23 PM

The Cat Slippery Slope
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
Okay, now I gotta be serious for a moment. Are they really selling flip flops for anything except wearing in the shower at the club or summer camp? Are people wearing them? I have seen a couple of teens with flippies on but I thought perhaps they were just rebelling against society. Flip flops? Really? Also, I did notice capris pants on my assistant and the executive secretary -- I explained, in a semi nice way, that capris pants are only for young girls (which they are not) and, in any event, not for women with stubby legs (which they both have) and not for the office (which we were all in at the time). Also, today, my assistant (who is a little bit older than I am) wore a pant and shirt combo that bared a wee little sliver of belly -- but her belly is neither wee nor little. Do I just leave the issue alone or do I tell her that pears should not expose belly skin?
Flip-flops have replaced puffy white sneakers as the women's commuter shoe of choice here. Some women are wearing them at the office. This will all change with the first fall weather anyway, when women will switch to the equally scary LLBean boots with suits.

Calling your assistant a pear will lead to an intentional work disaster at a crucial deadline moment and intense hatred for all time. You might gently say that you're sure she didn't mean to do this at the office, but her shirt is exposing her belly.

Flinty_McFlint 08-11-2003 05:26 PM

SECRET MESSAGE
 
WTFIWWYP? GBTW.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 08-11-2003 05:27 PM

The Cat Slippery Slope
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I am not sure where you would wear these, but they would please several fetishists at once.

http://store.nordstrom.com/product/p...tyleID=2818123

(spree: scratch & sniff flip flops)
Those aren't Asian.

purse junkie 08-11-2003 05:28 PM

Mormon hypo
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Seven of Nine

I know of no male Mormons who are actually opposed to Polygamy. Indeed, I don't know of any female Mormons who oppose consensual Polygamy.
Seven

When you see most of the guys who are polygamists, it's no wonder their individual wives are grateful their husbands are too busy screwing several other women to get around to them too often.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 08-11-2003 05:28 PM

The Cat Slippery Slope
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
Do I just leave the issue alone or do I tell her that pears should not expose belly skin?
Yes, so you can report the reaction.

Sidd Finch 08-11-2003 05:33 PM

Mormon hypo
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Seven of Nine
I know of no male Mormons who are actually opposed to Polygamy.

It seems likely that many, if not most, male Mormons would be opposed to polygamy, and that this has always been so.

Do the math. If every elder or big kahuna gets four wives, most men get none. Zero. Zilch. Combine that with a general rejection of premarital sex, and you're on the road to hell.

Combine that with lack of alcohol and living in Utah, and..... shudddddder.

TexLex 08-11-2003 05:35 PM

The Cat Slippery Slope
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
Are people wearing them?....
I see teenaged girls wearing flip flops all the time, but they only wear them to show off their toe rings. Also, it is effing hot here and I can hardly blame anyone for wearing them.

I do have a pair of comfy and baggy capri pants that if I were not as vast as I am right now, I would not wear, but frankly, the wardrobe is currently limited and comfort rules over aesthetics. I hope to be able to burn my entire current wardrobe in a few months. Mock me if you will.

And as to the exposed pear - I second PJ's adice. My secretary's boobs practically fell out of one shirt and she was pulling it up all day. I had to nicely suggest she retire the shirt or invest in a safety pin - I haven't seen the shirt since.

-TL

Sidd Finch 08-11-2003 05:37 PM

The Cat Slippery Slope
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
today, my assistant (who is a little bit older than I am) wore a pant and shirt combo that bared a wee little sliver of belly -- but her belly is neither wee nor little. Do I just leave the issue alone or do I tell her that pears should not expose belly skin?

Ugh. This is a major peeve of mine. More and more women and girls in slut-wear, without the bodies to carry it off. Simple rule: If your flesh hangs out over your waistband, you need to cover it.

Also, while I will confess a fondness for low-cut jeans, the best aspect of midriff exposure was the (well toned) navel area. Lately, it seems waistbands have drifted even lower (the phenom I refer to as "shave-pants", since you pretty much have to go Brazilian to wear them), and shirt hems have raced downward to catchup... resulting in the look of pants fastened just barely above the butt crack, and navels covered by shirts.

This is a profoundly disturbing development, and one that I see pretty much constantly around SF.

robustpuppy 08-11-2003 05:38 PM

SECRET MESSAGE
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Flinty_McFlint
WTFIWWYP? GBTW.
OK. Since I think I started this confusion today:

TUIMMALB -- a Thurgreedism, throw up in my mouth a little bit

TUAOM -- also from TM, throw up all over myself

LIGARAWYT -- this is a guess, but I think it means like i give a rat's ass what you think

LOLIAMHW67C -- little old lady in malodorous house with 67 cats (the full phrase was used in the post to which the poster using this acronym was responding)

Now, please explain yours. I'm stuck after "what the fuck is with" ...

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 08-11-2003 05:42 PM

SECRET MESSAGE
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy


Now, please explain yours. I'm stuck after "what the fuck is with" ...
I think there's one too many W's. Get back to work, you people.

Bad_Rich_Chic 08-11-2003 05:42 PM

SECRET MESSAGE
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Now, please explain yours. I'm stuck after "what the fuck is with" ...
Unless I miss my guess, "what the fuck is up with you people. Go back to work."

Shape Shifter 08-11-2003 05:47 PM

SECRET MESSAGE
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
I think there's one too many W's.
SFM

Flinty_McFlint 08-11-2003 05:47 PM

SECRET MESSAGE
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
OK. Since I think I started this confusion today:

TUIMMALB -- a Thurgreedism, throw up in my mouth a little bit

TUAOM -- also from TM, throw up all over myself

LIGARAWYT -- this is a guess, but I think it means like i give a rat's ass what you think

LOLIAMHW67C -- little old lady in malodorous house with 67 cats (the full phrase was used in the post to which the poster using this acronym was responding)

Now, please explain yours. I'm stuck after "what the fuck is with" ...
The answer, was "What the fuck is wrong with you people? Get back to work."

I think RP and Burger get split credit for dechipering the message, 10 points to both of you, well done.

And don't mind me, I'm just bitter I didn't win the $91M lottery this weekend and had to come to work. I'll be fine tomorrow. Maybe.

str8outavannuys 08-11-2003 05:55 PM

The Cat Slippery Slope
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
Okay, now I gotta be serious for a moment. Are they really selling flip flops for anything except wearing in the shower at the club or summer camp? Are people wearing them? I have seen a couple of teens with flippies on but I thought perhaps they were just rebelling against society. Flip flops? Really? Also, I did notice capris pants on my assistant and the executive secretary -- I explained, in a semi nice way, that capris pants are only for young girls (which they are not) and, in any event, not for women with stubby legs (which they both have) and not for the office (which we were all in at the time). Also, today, my assistant (who is a little bit older than I am) wore a pant and shirt combo that bared a wee little sliver of belly -- but her belly is neither wee nor little. Do I just leave the issue alone or do I tell her that pears should not expose belly skin?
This is an interesting and delicate subject. I'd ask your friends in HR to send around a global memo to all the assistants so that a) your assitant doesn't lose face, b) you don't have to be the bad guy, and c) Danny Heatley sucks deez nuts.

str8

str8outavannuys 08-11-2003 06:01 PM

Cape Cod Wedding Fashion
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
lengthy but surprisingly witty and readable post by BRC about the evolution of norms in men's fashion
God bless you BRC. Where would we be without you?
That said, I'm wearing a black two button notch lapel tuxedo at my wedding with a black vest and a long black tie (comments anyone?), but we want our guests to wear either suits, or tuxes if they so choose. I went with "black-tie optional" on our invites, after seeing what people chose to wear to the last "semi-formal" wedding I attended.

str8

ThrashersFan 08-11-2003 06:07 PM

Cape Cod Wedding Fashion
 
Quote:

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
I went with "black-tie optional" on our invites, after seeing what people chose to wear to the last "semi-formal" wedding I attended.

str8
I did not receive my invitation yet but just so that I am prepared I would like to know if underwear will also be optional. Brassiers, of course, should never be optional -- regardless of size.

Gattigap 08-11-2003 06:08 PM

Cape Cod Wedding Fashion
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
I did not receive my invitation yet but just so that I am prepared I would like to know if underwear will also be optional. Brassiers, of course, should never be optional -- regardless of size.
Given your prior posts on the subject, I fear it's a moot point.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 08-11-2003 06:08 PM

Cape Cod Wedding Fashion
 
Quote:

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
God bless you BRC. Where would we be without you?
That said, I'm wearing a black two button notch lapel tuxedo at my wedding with a black vest and a long black tie (comments anyone?), but we want our guests to wear either suits, or tuxes if they so choose. I went with "black-tie optional" on our invites, after seeing what people chose to wear to the last "semi-formal" wedding I attended.

str8
Uhoh. This is going to be one of those issue spotters for BRC, with a long response further bemoaning the confusion of what is a tuxedo.

ThurgreedMarshall 08-11-2003 06:13 PM

Spray on tan
 
Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
BTW, one helpful hint I still recall from Hollywood Wives by Jackie Collins, which I read proably in 8th grade in the quest for sex scenes, was that tans never come out nicely on film.
I know of at least one person who would disagree:

http://images.rottentomatoes.com/ima...9_36740_rt.jpg

TM

Atticus Grinch 08-11-2003 06:24 PM

There is no such thing as garden party chic
 
Nor is there such thing as "black tie optional." (Sorry, str8, I love you like a brother I've never met, but this is true.)

The point of dress traditions is to make everyone comfortable by making clothing irrelevant. In this way, black tie is somewhat like nudism, without all the towels on the seats. Yes, this means that the boys are all wearing the same thing and can't express their flamboyant originality by wearing their piano keyboard ties, etc. Most would agree this is a good thing.

When I receive a black tie or black tie optional invitation, my first thought is not, "Oh, those fuckers, making me dress up. I wish they would stop oppressing me." My thought is, "I hope everyone wears black tie." I feel slightly uncomfortable at a BT party talking with someone wearing a business suit or white tie, just as if they showed up at a poolside BBQ wearing jacket and tie.

Black tie optional accidentally makes all the people who wear black tie feel slightly more dressed up (not the point of the whole exercise, mind you) and the people who wear suits feel slightly less so. It reintroduces clothing, and noticing clothing, back into the party dynamics. ("Huh, I would have figured he owns a tux, with the money he's making at Cravath" etc.)

That said, I would rather go to a BTO party than a "creative black tie" holiday party, because there will always be some schmuck with a LED novelty tie, or a tie shaped like holly leaves, or some shit like that. I know it's not very Chrismassy, but these people should be festively beaten.

str8outavannuys 08-11-2003 06:40 PM

Do You Believe In Miracles? NO!
 
This just in: Herb Brooks has checked out. Sounds like he coulda used some of Gregory Hines' nimble moves.

http://sports.yahoo.com/top/news?slu...v=ap&type=lgns

robustpuppy 08-11-2003 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
This just in: Herb Brooks has checked out. Sounds like he coulda used some of Gregory Hines' nimble moves.
The shock of learning that you were not going to wear a bow tie with your tuxedo at your wedding must have caused him to lose control of his car.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 08-11-2003 06:49 PM

There is no such thing as garden party chic
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
The point of dress traditions is to make everyone comfortable by making clothing irrelevant....
This is why I wear jeans to business events. It makes a power statement, and the hoi polloi are made less comfortable.

Now if the rest of you would just get dressed again...

Sidd Finch 08-11-2003 06:54 PM

There is no such thing as garden party chic
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Long rant bemoaning the passing of the Victorian Era.
Christ, now there's two of you. Maybe threaded fora aren't such a bad idea after all.

Aloha Mr. Learned Hand 08-11-2003 07:13 PM

Do You Believe In Miracles? YES!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
This just in: Herb Brooks has checked out. Sounds like he coulda used some of Gregory Hines' nimble moves.

http://sports.yahoo.com/top/news?slu...v=ap&type=lgns
Too bad. He and that band of guys who for the most part did little on the professional level turned in one of the most stunning performances in US Olympic history, if not modern Olympic history. Don't think I'll ever forget watching that...

Sidd Finch 08-11-2003 07:24 PM

Do You Believe In Miracles? YES!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Aloha Mr. Learned Hand
Too bad. He and that band of guys who for the most part did little on the professional level turned in one of the most stunning performances in US Olympic history, if not modern Olympic history. Don't think I'll ever forget watching that...

What an amazing game that was. If you haven't seen the documentary on it, you should.

Atticus Grinch 08-11-2003 07:34 PM

Do You Believe In Miracles? YES!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Aloha Mr. Learned Hand
Too bad. He and that band of guys who for the most part did little on the professional level turned in one of the most stunning performances in US Olympic history, if not modern Olympic history. Don't think I'll ever forget watching that...
That performance was so intensely compelling that it's easy to forget it wasn't the gold medal matchup --- we had to go on to beat Finland in another nail-biter with three goals in the third period. But everybody forgets the Finland match.

It's kinda the same phenomenon that causes everybody to misremember that the Red Sox lost the '86 Series because the ball went through Buckner's legs. Well, yeah, but then they had to go and lose an entire other game in order to lose the whole banana.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 08-11-2003 07:42 PM

Do You Believe In Miracles? YES!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch

It's kinda the same phenomenon that causes everybody to misremember that the Red Sox lost the '86 Series because the ball went through Buckner's legs. Well, yeah, but then they had to go and lose an entire other game in order to lose the whole banana.
And some other people forget that the game was already tied, after the Sox blew a two-run lead, when Buckner let the grounder go through his legs. And that Stanley wasn't covering first anyway, and Wilson likely would have been safe. And that John McNamara left Bucker in at all when he had Dave Stapleton as a late-inning defensive replacement.

But I digress.

Fugee 08-11-2003 07:55 PM

Monday Musings
 
1. Metrosexuals are officially no longer "in." Proof? A feature story in the Minneapolis paper. Sorry Penske, your 15 minutes are over.
http://www.startribune.com/stories/389/4026105.html
http://www.startribune.com/stories/389/4027708.html

2. I have a mystery. Yesterday I returned home from church to find a very large gift bag on the Manor front porch. Inside were 3 items, unwrapped: A baby doll with a pink diaper, a small white pillow with eyelit trim and a stuffed purple hippo toy (the tag of which has the old name of a store that changed its name 2 years ago). No note. No tag. Nothing that even indicates I am the intended recipient. If I didn't know the Fugee Mom hadn't been in town, it is just the thing she'd have done -- only remembering weeks from now to call and tell me what I'm supposed to do with the stuff. The bag sits on my dining room table until the mystery is resolved.

Fugee 08-11-2003 08:09 PM

Monday Poll
 
This is sort of reality TV based but not necessarily.

It appears that at least one couple had sex in the Big Brother 4 (in like the first week or so) house although I missed that episode. If they did the deed, it is a first for U.S. Big Brother shows.

Question: If you were cast in a reality TV show, would you have sex with the cameras rolling? For those of you I already know are going to answer yes, what show would you want it to be and would you do it furtively under the covers or buck nekkid for all the world to see like a porn star? And if the first 2 questions are too easy, what would all you wannabe porn stars do to give the internet live feed watchers (or the cameramen for those who prefer a different reality show) a thrill?

You can make whatever assumptions you wish about the hotness and willingness of the fellow contestants, permission from the SO, ability to keep one's parents and grandparents from watching, etc. but may not assume any changes to your own physical anatomy.

Discuss amongst yourselves.

Fu(a sex poll from me, what is the world coming to?)gee

lookingformarket 08-11-2003 08:58 PM

Monday Musings
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Fugee
1. Metrosexuals are officially no longer "in." Proof? A feature story in the Minneapolis paper. Sorry Penske, your 15 minutes are over.
http://www.startribune.com/stories/389/4026105.html
http://www.startribune.com/stories/389/4027708.html

2. I have a mystery. Yesterday I returned home from church to find a very large gift bag on the Manor front porch. Inside were 3 items, unwrapped: A baby doll with a pink diaper, a small white pillow with eyelit trim and a stuffed purple hippo toy (the tag of which has the old name of a store that changed its name 2 years ago). No note. No tag. Nothing that even indicates I am the intended recipient. If I didn't know the Fugee Mom hadn't been in town, it is just the thing she'd have done -- only remembering weeks from now to call and tell me what I'm supposed to do with the stuff. The bag sits on my dining room table until the mystery is resolved.
Their hands were full. They'll drop the baby off tomorrow night.

Penske_Account 08-11-2003 09:07 PM

new and improved?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Fugee
1. Metrosexuals are officially no longer "in." Proof? A feature story in the Minneapolis paper. Sorry Penske, your 15 minutes are over.
http://www.startribune.com/stories/389/4026105.html
http://www.startribune.com/stories/389/4027708.html

A British guy called me a "poofster" on the golf course this past weekend for showing up for my tee time in surf shorts, a flowered hat, flip flops and painted toes. I think this must be the Euro-word for metrosexual and probably raises my status to one of Metrosexual, Internationale! My next 15 minutes have just begun.

Olé!

evenodds 08-11-2003 09:58 PM

Fugee's Sex Poll
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Fugee
Question: If you were cast in a reality TV show, would you have sex with the cameras rolling?
No.

Quote:

Originally posted by Fugee
For those of you I already know are going to answer yes, what show would you want it to be and would you do it furtively under the covers or buck nekkid for all the world to see like a porn star? And if the first 2 questions are too easy, what would all you wannabe porn stars do to give the internet live feed watchers (or the cameramen for those who prefer a different reality show) a thrill?
Were the answer yes, I would do it Real World style . . . under the blankets, and then lie about it on the reunion show.

leagleaze 08-11-2003 10:20 PM

Spray on tan
 
Quote:

Originally posted by mmm3587

I ran into this problem yesterday. This is a customizable option. Leags and others, can it be set at three instead?

Thanks!
Sure

Welcome!

leagleaze 08-11-2003 10:31 PM

Tapped Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
Toddlers who try to move faster than their uncoordinated little bodies can stand are funny too. I would certainly render aid if needed (or call for it) but I would still laugh and I fully expect people to laugh at me if I misjudge the curb or something. Admit it, that shit is funny.
So true. This past weekend I was helping my dad pack, so we had boxes all over the place. My nephew, who is one year old, got very excited and went running for a box.

Well, you know how packing boxes have flaps? You know what happens if you hit one of these flaps as you run towards the box, especially when you are the size of a one year old toddler?

That's right, you do a flip and you land inside the box. Sit there shocked for a minute as your Aunt, Dad and Grandpa stand there shocked for a moment, and then burst into tears as Dad picks you up.

He was fine, which enables me to say, damn that was some funny stuff.

Kids are hilarious. Extremely entertaining. You can't make up the shit they do.

Adder 08-11-2003 10:39 PM

Monday Poll
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Fugee
This is sort of reality TV based but not necessarily.

It appears that at least one couple had sex in the Big Brother 4 (in like the first week or so) house although I missed that episode. If they did the deed, it is a first for U.S. Big Brother shows.

Question: If you were cast in a reality TV show, would you have sex with the cameras rolling? For those of you I already know are going to answer yes, what show would you want it to be and would you do it furtively under the covers or buck nekkid for all the world to see like a porn star? And if the first 2 questions are too easy, what would all you wannabe porn stars do to give the internet live feed watchers (or the cameramen for those who prefer a different reality show) a thrill?

You can make whatever assumptions you wish about the hotness and willingness of the fellow contestants, permission from the SO, ability to keep one's parents and grandparents from watching, etc. but may not assume any changes to your own physical anatomy.

Discuss amongst yourselves.

Fu(a sex poll from me, what is the world coming to?)gee
Probably. Not too concerned about family finding out I guess. They can deal.

But I would probably do it furtively under the covers and wouldn't really be interested in giving the audience a thrill.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com