LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03 - 10-3-03 (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8)

paigowprincess 04-11-2003 02:45 PM

A New Low
 
Quote:

Originally posted by purse junkie
Now let's not blame Christina--she was forced to wear this full-body Pepto-Bismol bottle for a charity event.

If she had her choice, she'd merely look like a $5 crack whore.

p(voice of mercy)j
My god! She's motherjumpin huge! How did that happen so quickly? Is she pregnant?

THe crazy thing is I have no schadenfreude for this gal. I would think I would.

Anne Elk 04-11-2003 02:47 PM

A New Low
 
Quote:

Originally posted by neighsayer
And she was actually doing pretty well for a while.

:wtf:

neigh

http://www.eonline.com/Gossip/Fashio...42,542,00.html
Rumor has it that she is pregnant. Scary thought.

Mister_Ruysbroeck 04-11-2003 02:51 PM

Dead Heads
 
This board seems pretty dead for a friday. Is everyone off for the weekend already?

purse junkie 04-11-2003 02:51 PM

A New Low
 
Quote:

Originally posted by neighsayer
I don't see where it says she was forced to wear it.
I read somewhere else this morning that she was obliged to wear it for a charity gig. If she wasn't forced, then lord, she was certainly tricked.

And while we're talking 'charity', it would be a massive act of charity to the rest of the planet if someone could ensure that this chump never designs a dress again.

bilmore 04-11-2003 02:51 PM

Um, No.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Thanks. I know you all are still busy but at when you have the time, it would be helpful if this limit were clearly indicated on the PM screen.

I also don't mind being reminded that I should what I can to preserve space on the server.

r(shutting up now)p
Hey, pup:

DO WHAT YOU CAN DO TO PRESERVE SERVER SPACE!

YOU CAN ONLY HAVE FIFTEEN PM's!

(Sorry. Can't resist. ;) )

taxwonk 04-11-2003 03:06 PM

1987 Buick!?!?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
The guns I can understand, but the 1987 Buick? Never.

Berkeley police are on the lookout for a black 1987 Buick belonging to actor Sean Penn.

If I remember correctly, BUick made a muscle car for a number o years in the 60s and 70s called the GS. In the mid-80s, they revived it for a couple of years in a "Grand National" model. It looked kind of like a Dentist-mobile, but it was one fast motherfucker. They are now extremely rare and highly coveted among muscle car and vinatge car collectors.

Tyrone Slothrop 04-11-2003 03:13 PM

Um, No.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Hey, pup:

DO WHAT YOU CAN DO TO PRESERVE SERVER SPACE!

YOU CAN ONLY HAVE FIFTEEN PM's!

(Sorry. Can't resist. ;) )
Showing a flagrant disregard for server space there yourself.

(Oops.)

Atticus Grinch 04-11-2003 03:16 PM

1987 Buick!?!?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
If I remember correctly, BUick made a muscle car for a number o years in the 60s and 70s called the GS. In the mid-80s, they revived it for a couple of years in a "Grand National" model.
Well, I'll be damned. There really is a 1987 Buick Grand National muscle car. Found a pic in black. And I can just see Sean Penn behind the wheel. And two guns in the glove compartment.

I can also see why a car thief would pick this over all the beat-up custom-painted VW Vans in Berkeley.

http://www.selectmotors.net/images/buick/Dscn0100.jpg

Jack Manfred 04-11-2003 03:17 PM

Chaps-Shtick?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by purse junkie unless you are actually wrangling a steer at a rodeo at that very moment, never, never, wear chaps.
Because I put Alannah Myles on my laminated rocker list, I'd like to exempt her from the "No wearing chaps" rule, especially if she still looks as good as she did when "Black Velvet" came out.
Quote:

Or for God's sake, at least wear some decent underwear beneath 'em.
I think many of Christina's fashion problems would be solved if she decided (1) to wear underwear, and (2) to wear underwear under other articles of clothing.

taxwonk 04-11-2003 03:24 PM

reasonable inferences
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
I think it's becoming a universal problem. I got in to work, tried to answer four PM's, and got the "full" response from each person.
Well, it's not a UNIVERSAL problem. I've only gotten a few PMs, and my box has never been full.

Bitches, every single one of you!

purse junkie 04-11-2003 03:37 PM

Chaps-Shtick?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Jack Manfred
Because I put Alannah Myles on my laminated rocker list, I'd like to exempt her from the "No wearing chaps" rule, especially if she still looks as good as she did when "Black Velvet" came out.I think many of Christina's fashion problems would be solved if she decided (1) to wear underwear, and (2) to wear underwear under other articles of clothing.
Damn. As it happens I have a soft spot for bad 80s rock histrionics.

She--and only she among all non-cowboys--is exempt.

p(though she's not on my own list, NTTAWWT)j

evenodds 04-11-2003 04:13 PM

Why Wine Costs What it Does
 
From the NY Times:

Why Wine Costs What It Does By AMANDA HESSER

LAST year, when Paul Hobbs, a California winemaker, was about to release his 1999 Beckstoffer cabernet sauvignon, lots of things were going through his mind. He had investments to pay off and a reputation to build on the wine, but he was also facing a market that had softened tremendously. It was up to Mr. Hobbs to determine a retail price that would let him pay off some debts and draw the attention of serious wine drinkers, yet be low enough that he could actually sell the wine, not just this year but for vintages to come.

Mr. Hobbs thought long and hard and decided: $135.

Why does one bottle of fermented grape juice cost $135, and another just $15? Americans consumed 14.9 million cases of California cabernet in 2001, according to a study by Impact, a trade publication that tracks the wine industry, and customers in a wine store, faced with walls of bottles that range in price from the low end to the high, confront the question every time they shop.

Full text: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/09/dining/09PRIC.html

leagleaze 04-11-2003 04:24 PM

PMs
 
Yes, the limit is 15, and I did set it to save server space. As MR said the PM system is not meant to serve as an email system, I would think of it more as an IM system. If you want to save messages you have received you are best off cutting and pasting them into an email or something.

I am uncertain whether your out box impacts the number of messages, I will check this later when I have a chance and let you know.

I have been out of the office all day so I apologize for not responding earlier.

evenodds 04-11-2003 04:25 PM

Wine Rec
 
Our friend the wine buyer came back from Napa last week raving about the 2000 Beringer Chardonnay Sbragia Limited Release. It should be priced around $40.

Tyrone Slothrop 04-11-2003 04:30 PM

Wine Rec
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
Our friend the wine buyer came back from Napa last week raving about the 2000 Beringer Chardonnay Sbragia Limited Release. It should be priced around $40.
Anyone want to recommend something red for less than ten bucks?

bilmore 04-11-2003 04:35 PM

Wine Rec
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
Our friend the wine buyer came back from Napa last week raving about the 2000 Beringer Chardonnay Sbragia Limited Release. It should be priced around $40.
Cool. That's right in my normal price range. I can get two cases, and still have change from my hundred.

evenodds 04-11-2003 04:36 PM

Wine Rec
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
Anyone want to recommend something red for less than ten bucks?
What kind of red -- nothing too grape-y?

Tyrone Slothrop 04-11-2003 04:40 PM

Wine Rec
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
What kind of red -- nothing too grape-y?
I prefer zins and cabs, but I'm willing to try something different if it comes with a recommendation.

I had a Rancho Zabaco zin (I think -- maybe it was a cab) that was pretty cheap and pretty good recently.

AngryMulletMan 04-11-2003 04:50 PM

Wine Rec
 
You ought to try K&L (SF or MP). They stock all kinds of interesting stuff. I went in not too long ago and asked them to find me six interesting reds (no merlots), all under $15.

Kid you not, the guy was spot on. Everything was interesting and of great quality. Made for a fun dinner party with plenty of rave reviews from my wine snob friends.

AM(can't stand that pink porch wine!)M

evenodds 04-11-2003 04:52 PM

Wine Rec
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
I prefer zins and cabs, but I'm willing to try something different if it comes with a recommendation.

I had a Rancho Zabaco zin (I think -- maybe it was a cab) that was pretty cheap and pretty good recently.
I love really crappy reds -- I am a sucker for Cotes du Rhone. My typical price point is $10-12.

I heard good things about the new Montes Cab. I was told that they have released a wine that competes equally with the most elite cabs for about $40.

Here are some recommendations from my serious red wine friends:

For under $50:
Chateau St. Jean Cinq Cepages or the Cain Five

For under $25:
1998 Coudoulet de Beaucastel Cotes-Du-Rhone,
1998 Chateau du Grand Bos,
2000 Chateau Bellvue.

For table wine:
Mouton Cadet, Marques De Caceres, Niebaum-Coppola Merlot or Claret,
Wente.

Jack Manfred 04-11-2003 05:23 PM

Wine Rec
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds I heard good things about the new Montes Cab. I was told that they have released a wine that competes equally with the most elite cabs for about $40.
I'm not a wine expert, but I like Montes reds very much. Their Merlots are a great value. I have a '98 Cabernet and a '99 Special Cuvee Merlot on my wine rack.

Back when I lived in SF, Wine Impression(s?) was (is?) a great place to find inexpensive quality wines. There are plenty of wine shops down here in LA, but I couldn't make a recommendation.

Atticus Grinch 04-11-2003 05:31 PM

Wine Rec
 
Quote:

Originally posted by AngryMulletMan
You ought to try K&L (SF or MP).
K&L is very good, but I recommend Weimax in Burlingame for picking up individual bottles for a particular dinner or housewarming gift. Amazing selection if you know what you're looking for, but you can do pretty well just naming a price and your entree.

If the budget is $50 or under for a red, you can't go wrong with a Châteauneuf-du-Pape. It will beat the pants off most Napa wines in that price range. I've heard the same is true of any Brunello di Montalcino, but everything I know about Italian wines could be crammed into a Chianti bottle and topped with a candle.

If the budget is under $10, ask the wine merchant for the best Spanish wine in that range. Under no circumstances agree to anything from Minnesota. Nice people; fucked up wine.

former gov't 04-11-2003 05:39 PM

Wine Rec
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
Anyone want to recommend something red for less than ten bucks?
In my immediate post-college days, used to by "Cheap Red Wine" - that was the label - from the local safeway. About $5.

Seriously, can usually find a decent red in Chilean wines for less than $10 -wouldn't serve it to wine snobs - except at a blind wine tasting - always fun to see wine snobs fawning over Boones Farm.

Current favorite "Fat Bastard" label chardonnay and cabernet - just love the name and its pretty tasty - priced below $20.

evenodds 04-11-2003 05:50 PM

Wine Rec
 
Quote:

Originally posted by former gov't
Current favorite "Fat Bastard" label chardonnay and cabernet - just love the name and its pretty tasty - priced below $20.
I serve the Chardonnay for the same reason.

I also love Bonny Doon wines for lable purposes -- and they are good drinkin'-- especially the Cardinal Zin and Heart of Darkenss.

str8outavannuys 04-11-2003 05:59 PM

A New Low
 
Quote:

Originally posted by purse junkie
Which leads me to yet another fashion axiom that should be brainwashed into her--unless you are actually wrangling a steer at a rodeo at that very moment, never, never, wear chaps.

Or for God's sake, at least wear some decent underwear beneath 'em.
This is hugely outable to a small number of people, but during law school we had a trivia team for the weekly pub quiz; one regular on an opposing team showed up with chaps one week. The next week, our team name was "Chaps are Buttless Pants." Hard to argue, really.

str8

1 down 15 to go.

str8outavannuys 04-11-2003 06:01 PM

Chaps-Shtick?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Jack Manfred
Because I put Alannah Myles on my laminated rocker list, I'd like to exempt her from the "No wearing chaps" rule, especially if she still looks as good as she did when "Black Velvet" came out.I think many of Christina's fashion problems would be solved if she decided (1) to wear underwear, and (2) to wear underwear under other articles of clothing.
Does anyone else think Kimberly Caldwell will end up singing "Black Velvet" on AI before all is said and done?

str(if she doesn't, she should)8

1 down 15 to go

Atticus Grinch 04-11-2003 06:02 PM

There Is No Justice in Primetime
 
Does anyone know anyone who still watches "Frasier"? How the fuck is that show getting renewed --- AGAIN --- when shows like "Andy Richter" and "Sports Night" get cancelled by network suits, and shows like "Good Morning, Miami" get greenlighted? Is it some bizarre effort to set a record for Kelsey Grammer?

While we're at it, who watches "ER" anymore, anyway? I can understand that there is a geriatric Patch demographic that keeps the CBS lineup from changing and ruining millions of people's boring evenings of "Becker" or "Raymond" or "JAG," but I guarantee the oatmeal-for-breakfast crowd isn't keeping "Just Shoot Me" on the air. NBC's got no excuse for keeping that show, "Frasier" and "ER" limping along like this.

I have never once met a person who's sat through an episode of "Third Watch." And yet, it lives. For the love of God, how?

bilmore 04-11-2003 06:12 PM

Wine Rec
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Under no circumstances agree to anything from Minnesota. Nice people; fucked up wine.
You BOUGHT that?

(Dude, it's made from ferented fish picked up around icehouses in March. We sell it as a gag gift. Literally. Not a "joke" gift, a "gag" gift.)

Anne Elk 04-11-2003 06:19 PM

There Is No Justice in Primetime
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Does anyone know anyone who still watches "Frasier"? How the fuck is that show getting renewed --- AGAIN --- when shows like "Andy Richter" and "Sports Night" get cancelled by network suits, and shows like "Good Morning, Miami" get greenlighted?

While we're at it, who watches "ER" anymore, anyway?

I have never once met a person who's sat through an episode of "Third Watch." And yet, it lives. For the love of God, how?
I tried to watch Frasier the other night but couldn't stomach it. Sports Night was one of my favorites, I don't understand why it didn't last. Maybe they didn't think it could compete with all those ESPN commercials.

ER last night was pretty good. I only tend to watch it at the end of the season, too many re-runs mixed in during the early part of the year.

Third Watch y-a-w-n

bilmore 04-11-2003 06:20 PM

To MR or Leagl
 
Question re: PM's:

I just got a slough of e-mails saying "such-and-such has sent you a PM and your box is full . . ."

I only have three messages in my box.

What's a poor girl to do?

(I deleted messages earlier - do I have to empty a trash folder or something?)

SlaveNoMore 04-11-2003 06:27 PM

To MR or Leagl
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Question re: PM's:

I just got a slough of e-mails saying "such-and-such has sent you a PM and your box is full . . ."

I only have three messages in my box.

What's a poor girl to do?

(I deleted messages earlier - do I have to empty a trash folder or something?)
Did you delete your "out" box?

not7yS

AngryMulletMan 04-11-2003 06:45 PM

billmore's "out"?
 
what's a girl to do? you're finally out?

cool.

AngryMulletMan 04-11-2003 06:46 PM

lllll's
 
sorry, bilmore. a little too quick on the trigger finger today.

Alex_de_Large 04-11-2003 07:05 PM

Blocked (cross-posted to get a broader perspective)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
One that may work is that there is a "view printable version" option on this board. If you have a fairly good friend that could e-mail that page to you every couple of hours, you'd be at least caught up as to the goings on here. If it's a fairly overly nice friend, you could create a "Alex de Large captured" sock, or something and have them post your witty replies under that sock.
Not a bad idea. I still need to see what I can do about triangulating...

Alex_de_Large 04-11-2003 07:07 PM

Blocked (cross-posted to get a broader perspective)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze
If they have blocked the name but not the ip numbers you can connect using those. Try lawtalkers.net that connects through the numbers.

Also try http://www.anonymizer.com/ if you have a popup blocker on make sure it doesn't interfere.
They have blocked the ip and the name. I basically get a time out error. I'll look at anonymizer...

Alex_de_Large 04-11-2003 07:30 PM

IT problems: continued
 
OK, so I found a list of public proxy servers. Am I correct that I simply need to put in one of the addresses into the proxy server setting, and that's it?

I'd like to go this route as I'd like to be able to post (i.e. no anomynizer).

Inquiring minds want to know...

Atticus Grinch 04-11-2003 07:32 PM

Wine Rec
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore re: Minnesota wine
You BOUGHT that?
No, it was a gift from Minnesota friends. They seemed nice. I had no idea they secretly wanted to kill me and my family.

Tyrone Slothrop 04-11-2003 07:43 PM

Wine Rec
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
They seemed nice. I had no idea they secretly wanted to kill me and my family.
They always seem nice. That's what they do. And then they lull you into a sense of complacency by talking about ducks or the Vikes, or by telling you Iowa jokes, and then -- BOOM -- it's all over.

Flinty_McFlint 04-11-2003 08:49 PM

A New Low
 
Quote:

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
This is hugely outable to a small number of people, but during law school we had a trivia team for the weekly pub quiz; one regular on an opposing team showed up with chaps one week. The next week, our team name was "Chaps are Buttless Pants." Hard to argue, really.

str8

1 down 15 to go.
Ah, good times, good times. I also liked the jello-wrestling events down at the quad after Torts. Now I'm a big nerd, but you were on a trivia team during law school? That's like people who read for pleasure. What's wrong with you people? Can't you simply drink yourselves silly like the rest of us?

;)

leagleaze 04-11-2003 08:58 PM

PMs
 
Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze
Yes, the limit is 15, and I did set it to save server space. As MR said the PM system is not meant to serve as an email system, I would think of it more as an IM system. If you want to save messages you have received you are best off cutting and pasting them into an email or something.

I am uncertain whether your out box impacts the number of messages, I will check this later when I have a chance and let you know.

I have been out of the office all day so I apologize for not responding earlier.

Delete the PMs from your out box too. You might just make sure you uncheck the copy option, and it won't put a copy in your out box, and you therefore won't need to worry about it.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com