LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03 - 10-3-03 (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8)

Fugee 09-18-2003 03:20 PM

And now for something interesting.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by pantaloonie
[Political one night stand story involving potential Dave Matthews Band CD stealing]
Penske, you said you weren't socking anymore. Liar liar pants on fire.

mr. bob dobolina 09-18-2003 03:22 PM

Photo Retouch Fun
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sparklehorse
Just in case someone is bored with the sex stories, here is an amusing web site where one can see how photos look before and after being touched up.
Speaking of retouched photos, who's picture is on the cover of Hillary Clinton's new book:

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/07...1.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

http://www.ijohn.com/images/lying_hillary.jpg

greatwhitenorthchick 09-18-2003 03:23 PM

Question about sex
 
I have a question.

If you are in bed with someone really good looking (really good looking, not just cute) and that person's technique is not all that good, do they get a pass just because they are devastatingly beautiful/handsome? Or would you criticize them to your friends just as much when they are gone as you would someone not so good looking and equally lame in bed?

SEC_Chick 09-18-2003 03:25 PM

SL/FL
 
Anyone catch the Sorority and Fraternity Life premieres?

SL: Don't think I'll be watching it this season. Only one of the girls (Meena, the dance troupe one) is even moderately attractive. The pledge mom disturbs me as she looks like a 50-year-old old maid schoolmarm/librarian type and a lot like the neighbor that I loathe (READ THE DAMN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION RULES!!!) . They also skipped the rush process for this one, so I am less interested in the pledges. The "Even though I was talking loudly ouside your door at 2:30 in the morning, the fact that you asked me to quiet down shows that you are disrespectful of the sisters" bit cracks me up every time.

FL: Much more entertaining. While I think the cast would be more attractive with fewer piercings (lots of nostrils and eyebrows), they are at least fun to watch. While it won't be aired. 2 of the guys are being prosecuted for catching and cooking (and eating I believe) some really old koi that was some big campus tradition or something.

notcasesensitive 09-18-2003 03:26 PM

Photo Retouch Timmy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by mr. bob dobolina
Speaking of retouched photos, who's picture is on the cover of Hillary Clinton's new book:
whose indeed.

Fugee 09-18-2003 03:27 PM

O'Canada
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I don't understand what you are saying. Who is they? The article I read said a little girl (from CA) who played for a boys team in Windsor was beat up by her dad (also from CA, not that that has anything to do with anything). Nothing about the team not wanting her to play.
I was attempting to make a joke -- i.e. that Canadians are purists about their hockey and that no one anywhere wants Californians moving in on them -- much less Californian hockey dads. Obviously my lame attempt fell flatter than LFB's breasticles. Oh well, back to my "How to Tell a Joke" correspondence course.

bold_n_brazen 09-18-2003 03:29 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I have a question.

If you are in bed with someone really good looking (really good looking, not just cute) and that person's technique is not all that good, do they get a pass just because they are devastatingly beautiful/handsome? Or would you criticize them to your friends just as much when they are gone as you would someone not so good looking and equally lame in bed?
THey do not get a pass. In fact, they are judged even more harshly due to the fact that their extreme good-looking-ness should have affoded them more opportunity to hone their technique.

Being bad in bed is inexcusable. No one is safe from the friend critique...

Replaced_Texan 09-18-2003 03:31 PM

Survivor XXXVI
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I am looking forward to this, and I have not followed previous Survivors. I think it's because the cast includes a gravedigger and a mortician. This sounds promising.
Once upon a time I worked in a battered women's shelter, and one of the women I worked with had a crazy ex who happened to be in law enforcment. Every time she tried to move elsewhere, the guy would put out a search for her and he'd track her down within a month, bring her home, and beat the shit out of her. The woman was a mortician by trade, but she was pretty sure that she'd have to give that up because he'd just end up tracking her through the licensure process.

Anyhow, she was asking me about her options, and since he was pretty persistant, she was thinking about trying to change her identity so he couldn't track her down. I couldn't really advise her on anything other than the legal aspects of changing her name and restraining orders. While I was explaining the name change process, she blurted out "I know a lot of dead people and their information and stuff, can we use any of that?" I told her that we couldn't use someone else's information, and continued with my little lecture on the name change process. She left a few days later, and I have no idea what happened to her. I wouldn't be surprised if one of her former clients had a miraculous recovery.

Shape Shifter 09-18-2003 03:34 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I have a question.

If you are in bed with someone really good looking (really good looking, not just cute) and that person's technique is not all that good, do they get a pass just because they are devastatingly beautiful/handsome? Or would you criticize them to your friends just as much when they are gone as you would someone not so good looking and equally lame in bed?
A dull fuck is a dull fuck. I might be willing to devote more resources to training with someone really good looking, though.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 09-18-2003 03:34 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I have a question.

If you are in bed with someone really good looking (really good looking, not just cute) and that person's technique is not all that good, do they get a pass just because they are devastatingly beautiful/handsome? Or would you criticize them to your friends just as much when they are gone as you would someone not so good looking and equally lame in bed?
Would you rather have your star pitcher throw a 95 mile an hour fast ball that he can't get over the plate or a 80 something change up that he can place just where he wants it? (Because every good sex question deserves a sports metaphor).

The ones who waste a natural talent are a tragedy. The ones who do the most with what they are given deserve praise (and to be called on to pitch a few more games).


Editted to (Belatedly) Avoid a Timmy Rush (thanks, GWNCY)

idle acts 09-18-2003 03:37 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I have a question.

If you are in bed with someone really good looking (really good looking, not just cute) and that person's technique is not all that good, do they get a pass just because they are devastatingly beautiful/handsome? Or would you criticize them to your friends just as much when they are gone as you would someone not so good looking and equally lame in bed?
It is only fair to criticize them more, since their good looks created false expectations. And because you are entitled to SOME fun out of the deal.

greatwhitenorthchick 09-18-2003 03:38 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Would you rather have your star pitcher throw a 95 mile an hour fast ball that he can't get over the plate or a 80 something change up that he can place just where he wants it? (Because every good sex question deserves a sports metaphor).

The one's who waste a natural talent are a tragedy. The one's who do the most with what they are given deserve praise (and to be called on to pitch a few more games).
Now most of my baseball knowledge was gained on the day Darryl Strawberry played for the Springfield Isotopes, but I think I get your drift. (However I think your use of apostrophes might cause a few timmies on the board to implode. Might I suggest the "edit" function).

Did you just call me Coltrane? 09-18-2003 03:39 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I have a question.

If you are in bed with someone really good looking (really good looking, not just cute) and that person's technique is not all that good, do they get a pass just because they are devastatingly beautiful/handsome? Or would you criticize them to your friends just as much when they are gone as you would someone not so good looking and equally lame in bed?
I don't think so. If you've slept with a REALLY hot girl, and your buddies say "man you're lucky -- I'd love to fuck her", the normal response is "trust me - nothing to write home to mom about - she was a terrible lay"...In fact I've heard this quite frequently.

Unfortunately you really can never tell. Mild-mannered Susie could be a fuck-beast, while drinking, smoking hot Tara could lay there like a stiff board...

In fact, it's usually the cute but not uber-hot girls that absolutely go ape-shit in the sack.

Replaced_Texan 09-18-2003 03:40 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I have a question.

If you are in bed with someone really good looking (really good looking, not just cute) and that person's technique is not all that good, do they get a pass just because they are devastatingly beautiful/handsome? Or would you criticize them to your friends just as much when they are gone as you would someone not so good looking and equally lame in bed?
I am going to guess that pretty much everyone is going to say that they'd not get a pass, but they'd actually invite the person back to bed because he or she is so fucking hot. I mean, don't we all get that much more excited to fuck someone because we're really, really attracted to them? Attractiveness adds to the whole thing, otherwise we'd be asking for references instead of just trying to jump the bones of the hotties that we see. Sure, if nothing improves after a few tries, and you're getting bored, we'll be more willing to move on, but I'm pretty sure that the hotties that aren't any good in bed, in general, get more time to try out than the non-hotties. (Note: non-hotties doesn't mean unattractive, just not in that 0.01 percent).

notcasesensitive 09-18-2003 03:40 PM

Question about sex Timmy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy

The one's who waste a natural talent are a tragedy. The one's who do the most with what they are given deserve praise (and to be called on to pitch a few more games).
The ones indeed.

Thanks, RP and fringey for passing this OCD on to me.

Hank Chinaski 09-18-2003 03:41 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
A dull fuck is a dull fuck. I might be willing to devote more resources to training with someone really good looking, though.
No guy* walks on a really beautiful women because she's too passive, uncreative etc, at least not for a few months. This is because of to the whole question of what is "good" from a guy's perspective. See monolouge on subject in Clerks.

*Except for largely hypothetical people or stars who have a revolving door of the really beautiful.

NotFromHere 09-18-2003 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
This might be true if you total the repairs and maintenance you should do. An owner is likely to do what he should. A leasor often ignores everything shooting to just keep running until the turn in day. This results in very low mainenance costs.

The car companies are cracking down on this practice, but in general I bet leased cars still have lower actual costs than purchased cars due to the ignore factor.
Did you just pull this out of your ass, or do you base this on personal experience?

I, for one, keep my cars in impeccable condition. I will not be seen driving a rat. Maintenance is usually included (free oil changes, inspections, etc.). I even wax said leased car and condition the leather.
They inspect the car when you turn it in - they don't, however, check to see wheter you've kept proper inflation. But they do check for "undue wear." Not to be confused with underwear.
All maintenance is tracked in the computer, FYI.

There are as many people who ignore maintenance on their "purchased" cars - check any used car lot.

ABBAKiss 09-18-2003 03:42 PM

Question about sex
 
Why criticize? If you didn't like it, don't go back.

leagleaze 09-18-2003 03:47 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
Why criticize? If you didn't like it, don't go back.
I was wondering this. I don't tend to criticize my bed partners' abilities to other people for the most part.

I also will normally give someone several chances. The first time is awkward enough.

But no, no one gets a pass for being beautiful. No more than she would get a pass for being beautiful but an asshole or vapid. I wouldn't be interested.

greatwhitenorthchick 09-18-2003 03:48 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
Why criticize? If you didn't like it, don't go back.
Good point. But people tend to talk about this stuff even if they don't go back.

Hank Chinaski 09-18-2003 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
Did you just pull this out of your ass, or do you base this on personal experience?

I, for one, keep my cars in impeccable condition. I will not be seen driving a rat. Maintenance is usually included (free oil changes, inspections, etc.). I even wax said leased car and condition the leather.
They inspect the car when you turn it in - they don't, however, check to see wheter you've kept proper inflation. But they do check for "undue wear." Not to be confused with underwear.
All maintenance is tracked in the computer, FYI.

There are as many people who ignore maintenance on their "purchased" cars - check any used car lot.
Leases vary. Maintenace is not included in many leases, but certainly my time to take the car in and leave it for awhile is not included. If its a car I own, I might be more likely to do so. Also, changing the oil and other maintenance can be done at places not tied to the dealers computer. They do inspect the car, but you can usually argue them out of much of what they'll try and charge you for. So I'm comfortable with my post. I hadn't thought of my theory until reading the post I replied to, so I guess I did pull the theory out of my ass as you say.

ThurgreedMarshall 09-18-2003 03:52 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I have a question.

If you are in bed with someone really good looking (really good looking, not just cute) and that person's technique is not all that good, do they get a pass just because they are devastatingly beautiful/handsome? Or would you criticize them to your friends just as much when they are gone as you would someone not so good looking and equally lame in bed?
I have an answer.

They get a pass the first time. At least if you're a guy they do, because she's so fucking hot that it doesn't really matter. After that, she gets ridiculed behind her back. And eventually her hotness means nothing because, what's the point? Sure, your friends say, "DAMN she's hot. But you then have to say, "Sure. But the bitch can't screw and she gives lousy head." And they nod their heads thinking to themselves that they'd like to get a shot so they could confirm.

There is nothing worse than someone who doesn't know how to fuck.

TM

Atticus Grinch 09-18-2003 03:52 PM

I feel so special
 
Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
Huh? Are you suggesting that lesbians go to Wellesley? No doubt this is true. However, if you are putting forth the claim that the sapphic population is per-capita greater than at any other institution of higher learning (excepting all-male institutions, of course), such claim is dubious indeed; and shit.
I am devastated. I thought part of the reason a modern, civilized society allows single-sex educational institutions to persist is the hope that one day, when we are rich, fat and impotent, the trophy wife will regale us with stories of the brief shining moments she was a LUG art history major.

purse junkie 09-18-2003 03:55 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
Why criticize? If you didn't like it, don't go back.
It's a public service announcements. Friends don't let friends bed dopes.

notcasesensitive 09-18-2003 03:55 PM

Car discussion Timmy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
If its a car I own, I might be more likely to do so.
If it's a car you own indeed.

idle acts 09-18-2003 03:55 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze
I was wondering this. I don't tend to criticize my bed partners' abilities to other people for the most part.

I also will normally give someone several chances. The first time is awkward enough.

But no, no one gets a pass for being beautiful. No more than she would get a pass for being beautiful but an asshole or vapid. I wouldn't be interested.
In my experience, post mortems tend to be reserved for one (OK, maybe two) night stands, not long term partners. Since you are willing to give extra chances, by definition, your partners don't fall into this category.

IMHO, it would be rude to date someone, allow one's friends to get to know her, and then trash her performance in bed just b/c things didn't work out in the long run.

purse junkie 09-18-2003 03:57 PM

I feel so special
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
I am devastated. I thought part of the reason a modern, civilized society allows single-sex educational institutions to persist is the hope that one day, when we are rich, fat and impotent, the trophy wife will regale us with stories of the brief shining moments she was a LUG art history major.
No, honey. She'll have long since gone back to the source for some action, and won't be regaling you with play-by-plays.

leagleaze 09-18-2003 03:58 PM

Isabel
 
Just to be serious for a moment, as I see the impact of Isabel starting to become more prominent here, everyone please stay safe tonight and tomorrow.

If you aren't Burger, don't go watching for flying signs, Burger can duck in time. You probably can't.

And no driving your cars into puddles that don't look deep but are. We all know where that leads. Especially if you lease your car. The owner would be most put out.

NotFromHere 09-18-2003 03:59 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
I don't think so. If you've slept with a REALLY hot girl, and your buddies say "man you're lucky -- I'd love to fuck her", the normal response is "trust me - nothing to write home to mom about - she was a terrible lay"...In fact I've heard this quite frequently.

Unfortunately you really can never tell. Mild-mannered Susie could be a fuck-beast, while drinking, smoking hot Tara could lay there like a stiff board...

In fact, it's usually the cute but not uber-hot girls that absolutely go ape-shit in the sack.
Isn't that true of all hot people? That they're more selfish and self centered and therefore bad in bed? Plus - who needs to be good when people are thowing themselves at you. Who's going to be there to tell you how bad you are when you can just go out and get someone new. Oh, the tragedy of being beautiful.

NotFromHere 09-18-2003 04:02 PM

Car discussion Timmy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
If it's a car you own indeed.
What was that drug again for the OCD? Oh yeah, that's right. Behavior modification. Handcuff your hands to your office chair, read all the post's from people's whose dont' know how to use appostrophes' and see how long it take's you to chew through the armrest's.

idle acts 09-18-2003 04:02 PM

Isabel
 
Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze
[Kind Post re Hurricane Safety]
Speaking of hurricanes, where is Paigow today?

ABBAKiss 09-18-2003 04:03 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
Isn't that true of all hot people?
It's true of some, but not all. The hottest guy I've ever slept with was also the best.

Dude. I miss him. Memories.

Atticus Grinch 09-18-2003 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Well for the first 3 years (in the case of piece of shit Jeeps) everything is under warranty. Thereafter it is not.
That increases somewhat the value you receive by paying for the steeper depreciation during that period, but it has no effect on the Magliozzi thesis that the annual cost of maintenance (whether you pay it or someone else does) remains pretty consistent over time.

This issue is irrelevant to the lease v. buy debate --- I just wanted to address the widespread myth that the cost of keeping a old car running is an upward slope. It's not. The general trend line is flat; I think the Magliozzis found the average was about $800/yr or something for repairs and maintenance. You might not have repairs one year, and get hit for $1,600 the next, but it stays a relatively flat line.

If you budget --- and bank --- that for each year you own the car, you will probably keep it running to 150,000 miles or much more. The point is to debunk the idea that a car reaches a critical juncture at which the annual cost goes above that average and that you're doing yourself some kind of financial favor for getting rid of the car (i.e., "Dump it before it really starts costing you money.") All of this analysis occurs outside the warranty window.

I've heard the Magliozzis say on the radio that, cost aside, reliability is a legitimate reason to dump a car --- if you can't stand the risk of breaking down by the side of the road, you should bear the additional cost of always being early in a car's life cycle. But again, this doesn't require that repair costs jump in year 8 or 10 like most people think they do. The Magliozzis concluded that the supposed jump was something people tell themselves on the showroom floor to convince themselves to do something they want to do but don't need to do, i.e., buy a new car when the old one is still running.

ias_39 09-18-2003 04:04 PM

Question about sex
 
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski

Quote:

No guy* walks on a really beautiful women because she's too passive, uncreative etc, at least not for a few months.
While I doubt as many of the menfolk as the womenfolk would hit the road due to a denial of, or inability at, oral sex, I bet there are some.

ThrashersFan 09-18-2003 04:04 PM

Isabel
 
Quote:

Originally posted by idle acts
Speaking of hurricanes, where is Paigow today?
Speaking of hurricanes, thanks to the Phillies coming from behind and spanking the Marlins (oh, HAHA -- you pervs), the Braves have clinched their 12th division title.

Carry on.

Shape Shifter 09-18-2003 04:05 PM

Question about sex
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
In fact, it's usually the cute but not uber-hot girls that absolutely go ape-shit in the sack.
This has been my experience, but I'd like to increase the sample size of the uber-hot. To be scientific, and all.

notcasesensitive 09-18-2003 04:05 PM

Isabel
 
Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze
Just to be serious for a moment, as I see the impact of Isabel starting to become more prominent here, everyone please stay safe tonight and tomorrow.

If you aren't Burger, don't go watching for flying signs, Burger can duck in time. You probably can't.

And no driving your cars into puddles that don't look deep but are. We all know where that leads. Especially if you lease your car. The owner would be most put out.
Seriously. We've got rain here and we are at least 1100 miles away from the eye. I'm wondering if Burger and fringey saw the pic on the cnn homepage today that showed someone using a Dead End sign as an umbrella. I'm sure when the wind gusted, hilarity ensued!

Adder 09-18-2003 04:19 PM

Isabel
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Seriously. We've got rain here and we are at least 1100 miles away from the eye. I'm wondering if Burger and fringey saw the pic on the cnn homepage today that showed someone using a Dead End sign as an umbrella. I'm sure when the wind gusted, hilarity ensued!
As there is still nothing serious going on here yet. Just another rainy, windy day. Really, its just a perfect day to stay home from work and have sex all day.

That is, if you aren't me.

Shape Shifter 09-18-2003 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I hadn't thought of my theory until reading the post I replied to, so I guess I did pull the theory out of my ass as you say.
At least we're getting back to the sex talk.

ias_39 09-18-2003 04:25 PM

Hey Macarena
 
Cheffie: [request for coitus interruptus storeis]

NFH: Two words: Hotel Housecleaning

NCS: Three words: Do Not Disturb

Actually, two words: Door chain.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com