Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521749)

They aren’t rushing to judgment. Judgment has been entered. No collusion. Mueller’s finding, not Barr’s.

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 521744)

No. You are in Crazytown and you've built yourself quite the comfortable life there.

We already know he obstructed justice. He did it in the fucking open. He publicly stated that he fired Comey because of the investigation. He fired Sessions because he recused himself. He asked for his own guy to be put in place at the SDNY. I believe there is lots of evidence showing this in the report. I'd like to see it.

Barr auditioned for this job because he believes, fundafuckingmentally that the President cannot obstruct justice. Trump got the message loud and clear and installed him. And guess what? Barr has concluded Trump didn't obstruct justice. It's a complete joke.

It is so obvious that there is enough in that report--re collusion and obstruction--to impeach this asshole and charge him with obstruction (you know, if you believed that a sitting President could be guilty of obstruction) that the White House, Barr and the entire Republican Party do not want to be held accountable for not being involved in doing so.

Your rants about what the media (again, not a monolithic entity) "implied" by reporting on the actual comings and goings of this criminal fucking Administration are pure ether above the clouds. Maybe you can't separate the opinion pieces and talking heads from the actual reporting. But your ravings are meaningless, empty, bullshit because they are based on a bullshit memo written by a man whose reputation you think is something other than what it actually is about the report that we all absolutely need to see.

You are a sucker because you have swallowed the Republican strategy hook, line, and sinker.

TM

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 521751)

HOLY SHIT!!! SEBBY HAS SEEN MUELLER'S FINDINGS!!!!

Sebby, please, more detail.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521752)

I was wrong. You’re not in Crazytown. You’re somewhere in Kubler-Rossville.

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 521754)

Whatever. You're a sucker.

TM

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521755)

Am not.

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 521773)

Barr misleads by omission. Wow, he's going to be in trouble now.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521774)

You’re slowly but in a quite determined fashion degrading into the town lunatic.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521774)

You’re slowly but in a quite determined fashion degrading into the town lunatic.

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 521776)

Here's the thing Sebby. You're driving down a one way street. Everyone else is going in the same direction. Do you look at the signs?

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521777)

Were I to agree with the herding that goes on on this board, I would doubt myself. That’s the one-way street I usually focus on when posting here.

The more disagreement I receive here on matters political, the more confidence I have in a position.

Most reputable, non-partisan sources are adopting the position that I have. There is of course more dirt in the report, but Barr has not misrepresented it on material matters which would make an enormous difference.

And I fully understand that whatever is in that report, when it comes out, people here will say I was wrong and that the dirt that was covered up was material. We will never be able to litigate “materiality” because there is a fundamental philosophical difference of opinion on what constitutes that. Stated otherwise, Ty will, as he always is able to, declare victory at some point in the future on this issue. “And so it goes...,“ as Vonnegut says.

Apologies on the sometimes stilted language in this post. I’m dictating.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521774)

You’re slowly but in a quite determined fashion degrading into the town lunatic.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521777)

Were I to agree with the herding that goes on on this board, I would doubt myself.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521777)

That’s the one-way street I usually focus on when posting here.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521777)

The more disagreement I receive here on matters political, the more confidence I have in a position.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521777)

Most reputable, non-partisan sources are adopting the position that I have.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521777)

There is of course more dirt in the report, but Barr has not misrepresented it on material matters which would make an enormous difference.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521777)

And I fully understand that whatever is in that report, when it comes out, people here will say I was wrong and that the dirt that was covered up was material.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521777)

We will never be able to litigate “materiality” because there is a fundamental philosophical difference of opinion on what constitutes that.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521777)

Stated otherwise, Ty will, as he always is able to, declare victory at some point in the future on this issue. “And so it goes...,“ as Vonnegut says.

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 521777)

Apologies on the sometimes stilted language in this post. I’m dictating.