LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Congratulations Slave and Catrin!!! (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=814)

robustpuppy 12-17-2008 05:36 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 374730)
On the subject of facebook.... many of my sorority sisters have recently been scanning photos from formals, etc. and posting them on facebook.

I had big hair. And questionable taste in clothes.

Though the photo of me and my soon-to-be-husband and I from the sophomore winter formal is pretty amusing.

Have they been tagging you? There ought to be a rule that you can't tag someone in an old scanned photo without their consent, as at the time the photo was taken, you couldn't have anticipated the possibility of its going viral.

My concern relates to certain pictures on Lake Lanier, but I'm sure this view is pretty universal among those of us who came of age before digital photography and the internet.

Hank Chinaski 12-17-2008 05:45 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 374730)
On the subject of facebook.... many of my sorority sisters have recently been scanning photos from formals, etc. and posting them on facebook.

I had big hair. And questionable taste in clothes.

Though the photo of me and my soon-to-be-husband and I from the sophomore winter formal is pretty amusing.

but where do you stand on the Eric Devendorf thing?

Atticus Grinch 12-17-2008 05:46 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by robustpuppy (Post 374733)
My concern relates to certain pictures on Lake Lanier, but I'm sure this view is pretty universal among those of us who came of age before digital photography and the internet.

2. It's hell being the first generation to live out our lives on the Internets and also the last generation to have any sense of privacy or shame.

bold_n_brazen 12-17-2008 05:50 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 374734)
but where do you stand on the Eric Devendorf thing?

I think the 'Cuse is fucked if the suspension actually stands.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 12-17-2008 05:51 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by robustpuppy (Post 374733)
Have they been tagging you? There ought to be a rule that you can't tag someone in an old scanned photo without their consent, as at the time the photo was taken, you couldn't have anticipated the possibility of its going viral.

It's a penalty for your lack of prescience. Home porn videos have been around for years, since you got boobs. How much of a leap is it to figure out that people could start sending around still photos as well?

robustpuppy 12-17-2008 05:57 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 374737)
It's a penalty for your lack of prescience. Home porn videos have been around for years, since you got boobs. How much of a leap is it to figure out that people could start sending around still photos as well?

Yeah, but since I had no plans to enter the Miss America pageant or run for public office, I figured the free doubles from Fotomat would sit in a drawer forever.

Replaced_Texan 12-17-2008 06:06 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by robustpuppy (Post 374733)
Have they been tagging you? There ought to be a rule that you can't tag someone in an old scanned photo without their consent, as at the time the photo was taken, you couldn't have anticipated the possibility of its going viral.

My concern relates to certain pictures on Lake Lanier, but I'm sure this view is pretty universal among those of us who came of age before digital photography and the internet.

You can untag pictures of yourself.

John Phoenix 12-17-2008 06:07 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 374730)

I had big hair.

et alia.

LessinSF 12-17-2008 06:10 PM

Re: mini rant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 374715)
It irritates me greatly that the birth control pill requires a prescription. It's a fucking pain in the ass to deal with dr.'s offices, pharmacies, insurance companies, etc to get a piece of paper that says I can continue doing the same damned thing I've been doing for years.

end rant

Since I first saw the ads for the Samsung "Rant" phone, I have felt it should be Sebby's premier Xmas gift. Now you get one too:

http://www.mobilewhack.com/wp-conten...nt-300x249.jpg

Penske_Account 12-17-2008 06:16 PM

Re: mini rant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 374722)
good thing Depends are over the counter, or we'd be hearing from Wonk on this topic...... in three days.

I thought they required a prescription.....but I have no experience with adult diapers, so I defer to you.

bold_n_brazen 12-17-2008 06:18 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 374739)
You can untag pictures of yourself.

I am hugely amused by the photos. So far.

Penske_Account 12-17-2008 06:23 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 374737)
It's a penalty for your lack of prescience. Home porn videos have been around for years, since you got boobs.

2. and I would bet they were around before she got boobs, assuming she is of a certain age. As a young lad of 12, back in olden days, I was dog sitting for neighbours and happened upon the home porn videos that they had made, and stored in the back of the their closet, under the shoe rack.

robustpuppy 12-17-2008 06:26 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 374739)
You can untag pictures of yourself.

I think I knew that once. Is my PC making that whirring sound, or my brain?

Flinty_McFlint 12-17-2008 06:32 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 374737)
It's a penalty for your lack of prescience. Home porn videos have been around for years, since you got boobs. How much of a leap is it to figure out that people could start sending around still photos as well?

Here's the thing we started off friends
First on Myspace but it was all pretend
Yeah yeah
Since you got boobs

Re-registered you took the time
Wasn't long till I found you online
Yeah Yeah
Since you got boobs

And all you'd ever see me post
Is how I pictured you with boobs
That's all you'd ever hear me say

But since you got boobs
I can see them for the first time
I知 so clicking on
Yeah yeah
Thanks to you (and FB)
Now I get
What I want
Since you got boobs

How can I put it? you put me on
I even fell for that cookie application
Yeah yeah
Since you got boobs

How come I never hear you say
I just wanna show you boobs
I guess you never felt that way

But since you got boobs
I can see them for the first time
I知 so clicking on
Yeah yeah
Thanks to you
Now I get
I get what I want
Since you got boobs

You had your chance you blew it
Breasticles, out of mind
Watch that .gif, I just can't take it
Again and again and again and again

Since you got boobs
I can see them for the first time
I知 so clicking on
Yeah yeah
Thanks to you (thanks to you)
Now I get
I get what I want
I can see them for the first time
I知 so clicking on
Yeah yeah
Thanks to you (thanks to you)
Now I get (I get)
You should know (you should know)
That I get
I get what I want
Since you got boobs
Since you got boobs
Since you got boobs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41LG2...eature=related

notcasesensitive 12-17-2008 06:36 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 374730)
On the subject of facebook.... many of my sorority sisters have recently been scanning photos from formals, etc. and posting them on facebook.

I had big hair. And questionable taste in clothes.

Though the photo of me and my soon-to-be-husband and I from the sophomore winter formal is pretty amusing.

Multiple personalities? Who looked better, me or I?

LessinSF 12-17-2008 06:40 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flinty_McFlint (Post 374747)
Here's the thing we started off friends
First on Myspace but it was all pretend
Yeah yeah
Since you got boobs

Re-registered you took the time
Wasn't long till I found you online
Yeah Yeah
Since you got boobs

And all you'd ever see me post
Is how I pictured you with boobs
That's all you'd ever hear me say

But since you got boobs
I can see them for the first time
I知 so clicking on
Yeah yeah
Thanks to you (and FB)
Now I get
What I want
Since you got boobs

How can I put it? you put me on
I even fell for that cookie application
Yeah yeah
Since you got boobs

How come I never hear you say
I just wanna show you boobs
I guess you never felt that way

But since you got boobs
I can see them for the first time
I知 so clicking on
Yeah yeah
Thanks to you
Now I get
I get what I want
Since you got boobs

You had your chance you blew it
Breasticles, out of mind
Watch that .gif, I just can't take it
Again and again and again and again

Since you got boobs
I can see them for the first time
I知 so clicking on
Yeah yeah
Thanks to you (thanks to you)
Now I get
I get what I want
I can see them for the first time
I知 so clicking on
Yeah yeah
Thanks to you (thanks to you)
Now I get (I get)
You should know (you should know)
That I get
I get what I want
Since you got boobs
Since you got boobs
Since you got boobs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41LG2...eature=related

Until I clicked on the link I was having a hard time fitting the lyrics into Rainbow's classic:

Since you been gone, since you been gone
I'm outta my head, can't take it
Could I be wrong, but since you been gone
You cast the spell, so break it
Oooohhh - Whhooooaaa - Ooooohhh
Since you been gone

notcasesensitive 12-17-2008 06:43 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by robustpuppy (Post 374745)
I think I knew that once. Is my PC making that whirring sound, or my brain?

I never know who can see what photos because some of my friends make theirs private to only their friends. Which is my long and confusing way of saying that I asked my sister if she knew the locale where a certain picture of me on fb was taken and she told me that she couldn't see the picture, even when I shared it with her. It is unclear how much of the issue is user error on my sister's end (she says she can't see it even now when it is a profile picture of mine) however.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 12-17-2008 07:11 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 374710)
I have to say I am a little upset that gwnk never asked me to be her facebook friend. I'm just putting that out there.

I understand she doesn't friend those she had, has or may have a thing with. Good News!

Hank Chinaski 12-17-2008 07:53 PM

Re: mini rant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Penske_Account (Post 374742)
I thought they required a prescription.....but I have no experience with adult diapers, so I defer to you.

translation: I'm emancipated from my mother since....... oh, God. I can't keep this up.

no mas.

Hank Chinaski 12-17-2008 07:58 PM

Re: Hmph
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive (Post 374750)
user error on my sister's end

that's what Flinty said made him mad at me after I took his to prom.

Adder 12-17-2008 08:21 PM

Re: put down the pitchforks
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 374727)
I debated on which board to post this on, but I figured it probably belonged her instead of on the PB.

Bill filed to bar BCS from using the words "National Champion" unless there's a playoff involved.

Absurd.

Penske_Account 12-17-2008 08:23 PM

Re: mini rant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 374752)
...............................................oh, God. I can't keep this up.

no mas.

Don't most of your homemade pornos end that same way?

Atticus Grinch 12-17-2008 09:12 PM

Actual fashion post.
 
Beef jerky handbag.

http://blog.makezine.com/MAKE_PT1475.jpg
http://blog.makezine.com/MAKE_PT1476.jpg

Penske_Account 12-17-2008 09:50 PM

Re: Actual fashion post.
 
Any chance that they make a Turkey jerkey or Ostrich jerkey varietals?

Adder 12-17-2008 09:54 PM

Re: put down the pitchforks
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 374728)
Adder may be able to defend the BCS . . .

I vote for going back to the old fashioned bowl system, and letting the polls decide. I would much rather listen to people bicker about who the national champion is, than over which non-bcs, lame-ass WAC team got snubbed for the right to get killed in the non-champion BCS bowls. In my view, a playoff doesn't help because instead of bickering over the top 2-4 we will bicker over the top 6-8 or 12-16. Both arguments are stupid.

bling trade 12-17-2008 10:37 PM

Wipe Out Troika: Cycle, Gymnast, and Dancer
 
http://embed.break.com/NjE4Mzkw

http://embed.break.com/NjE5NjYy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kChD...layer_embedded

Hank Chinaski 12-17-2008 10:53 PM

Re: put down the pitchforks
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 374758)
I vote for going back to the old fashioned bowl system, and letting the polls decide. I would much rather listen to people bicker about who the national champion is, than over which non-bcs, lame-ass WAC team got snubbed for the right to get killed in the non-champion BCS bowls. In my view, a playoff doesn't help because instead of bickering over the top 2-4 we will bicker over the top 6-8 or 12-16. Both arguments are stupid.

I dunno about playoffs but BCS is better than what was before. The last two years, under the old system, Ohio state would have played the Pac-10 champ in the rose bowl. OSU might have won, and might have had an argument they were best, when they clearly were not.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 12-17-2008 11:07 PM

Re: put down the pitchforks
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 374758)
In my view, a playoff doesn't help because instead of bickering over the top 2-4 we will bicker over the top 6-8 or 12-16. Both arguments are stupid.

Perhaps, but it seems a little easier to reject one 8-4 team for another and not be too worried about it. This year highlights the problem--at least 3, if not 6, teams with a decent claim, and only two are playing. The only reason they're recognized as 1 and 2 is because the BCS has convinced people it's right about who's 1 and 2.

bling trade 12-17-2008 11:15 PM

Re: Actual fashion post.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 374756)
Beef jerky handbag

Some cats and dogs will gnaw through bags to get at beef jerky. I can imagine what they'd do to this bag.

tmdiva 12-18-2008 12:17 AM

Re: Wipe Out Troika: Cycle, Gymnast, and Dancer
 
The best part about the first one is the camera person who trips and lands on his equipment. Twice the fun.

Hank Chinaski 12-18-2008 09:39 AM

Re: Congratulations Slave and Catrin!!!
 
so i was looking at a book about writing exercises, and it was saying that talking about human bodies, at least attractive ones, in an unique and interesting way is tough. the exercise recommends focusing on flaws, like not "she was really beautiful, with large real breasts" but instead focus on a scar maybe.

so for lawtalkers secret santa I got adder, and I was looking at realdoll.com for ideas and there is an annoucement that they are selling factory seconds, with minor flaws, on something called dollforum.com

I spent 2 minutes on dollforum and I no longer feel Ironweed is the oddest person I know of, but I digress: given that what makes a real beautiful body most intersting is its flaws, wouldn't a factory second love doll be better than a perfect one?

dtb 12-18-2008 10:09 AM

Re: Congratulations Slave and Catrin!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 374766)
so i was looking at a book about writing exercises, and it was saying that talking about human bodies, at least attractive ones, in an unique and interesting way is tough. the exercise recommends focusing on flaws, like not "she was really beautiful, with large real breasts" but instead focus on a scar maybe.

so for lawtalkers secret santa I got adder, and I was looking at realdoll.com for ideas and there is an annoucement that they are selling factory seconds, with minor flaws, on something called dollforum.com

I spent 2 minutes on dollforum and I no longer feel Ironweed is the oddest person I know of, but I digress: given that what makes a real beautiful body most intersting is its flaws, wouldn't a factory second love doll be better than a perfect one?


You're weird.

Icky Thump 12-18-2008 10:19 AM

Last-minute holiday gifts
 
Why am I getting emails suggesting last-minute holiday gift ideas? Was I supposed to have purchased Xmas presents already? Xmas isn't for a whole week.

ThurgreedMarshall 12-18-2008 10:46 AM

Re: put down the pitchforks
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 374758)
I vote for going back to the old fashioned bowl system, and letting the polls decide. I would much rather listen to people bicker about who the national champion is, than over which non-bcs, lame-ass WAC team got snubbed for the right to get killed in the non-champion BCS bowls. In my view, a playoff doesn't help because instead of bickering over the top 2-4 we will bicker over the top 6-8 or 12-16. Both arguments are stupid.

We may bicker over the top 6-8 or 12-16, but there would be no argument over who should be national champion (or who should be in the national championship game), which is all that really matters.

TM

Hank Chinaski 12-18-2008 10:59 AM

Re: Congratulations Slave and Catrin!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dtb (Post 374767)
You're weird.

2. Still, Howard Stern talks about real dolls. i heard they were selling their factory seconds, and it struck me as sad that someone who is so pathetic that have to buy one needs to settle for a factory second, but then I thought maybe it isn't so bad.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 12-18-2008 11:10 AM

Re: put down the pitchforks
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 374771)
We may bicker over the top 6-8 or 12-16, but there would be no argument over who should be national champion (or who should be in the national championship game), which is all that really matters.

TM

No kidding. Who remembers any of the excluded "bubble" teams in the NCAA hoops tournament after the games start? They're always teams that are good, but finished well down in their conference (too bad #9 from the ACC or Big Ten) Half of them lose in the first round of the NIT anyway. If they win the NIT, then everyone remembers that.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 12-18-2008 11:20 AM

Coke with Stevia
 
So, it looks like Coke/Pepsi will soon be using a stevia-based sweetener in some of their drinks. I enjoy the stevia. Do we know if they're going to use actual stevia, or some product containing stevia combined with several other artificial cancerous Big Sweetener chemicals?

John Phoenix 12-18-2008 11:28 AM

Re: Coke with Stevia
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane? (Post 374774)
So, it looks like Coke/Pepsi will soon be using a stevia-based sweetener in some of their drinks. I enjoy the stevia. Do we know if they're going to use actual stevia, or some product containing stevia combined with several other artificial cancerous Big Sweetener chemicals?

What have you tried that has stevia in it? Will this product be better than Coke Zero?

Adder 12-18-2008 11:31 AM

Re: put down the pitchforks
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 374762)
Perhaps, but it seems a little easier to reject one 8-4 team for another and not be too worried about it. This year highlights the problem--at least 3, if not 6, teams with a decent claim, and only two are playing. The only reason they're recognized as 1 and 2 is because the BCS has convinced people it's right about who's 1 and 2.

That's why the old bowl system is preferable to the current BCS. We don't have to decide who is 1 and 2 until it is all over, and we let the polls decide.

Adder 12-18-2008 11:32 AM

Re: Congratulations Slave and Catrin!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dtb (Post 374767)
you're weird.

2


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:25 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com