![]() |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
And how about the Mercedes-driving predators who pay so little (and charge their victims a fee of $100 for the privilege of being underpaid) and impose such long hours and exercise so much control that one can't help but think of the 13th Amendment? Or those of us who only think "hey, $10 for a pedicure! Awesome!" and who demand that the store replace our Prada sandals when nail varnish is spilled on them? Or, people like me, who know better about things, but pretend not to realize that someone is getting very screwed when I pay a mere $10 for a service that takes 30 minutes. Sure, I like the way my soles feel after a pedi (not to mention the look of MAC Dark Angel on my toes), but I really need to remember the actual cost of it. I am so angry about this. And I want to throw this story in the face of every smug bastard who, with a straight face, can talk about how terrible it is that we want to get poor people fired when we propose raising the minimum wage or enacting some legislation or regulation to protect workers. |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
But of course, everyone time one shops at Walmart, you're encouraging this sort of thing, not just went you grab the $10 special from the pedicurist down the alley. |
Re: Where life is beautiful all the time
Quote:
Thank god these assholes only meet for four months every other year. |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
(You just keep your mouth shut about how Target and every clothing retailer does the same stuff). |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
If you're talking about the labor practices of Walmart's suppliers overseas, yes. And I encourage it by using my iPhone and wearing Nikes. And everytime I complain I mention how "free" trade isn't really free trade because many countries subsidize the production of goods by either not having or not enforcing labor (or environmental) standards re wages and safety, I get laughed at and told that we can't stop the Invisible Hand ("from smacking labor around" is the unspoken end of the statement. Whatever. I think I'm writing in Michael Harrington's name on my presidential primary ballot next year. |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
See, e.g., In 2008, Walmart agreed to pay at least $352 million to settle lawsuits claiming that it forced employees to work off the clock. "Several lawyers described it as the largest settlement ever for lawsuits over wage violations." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Walmart |
Re: Washing her feet by candle-light. First she washed them, then she dried them...
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
I get it. I just think that the working conditions at Walmart are not quite the working conditions for manicurists that the NYT article described. Every single nail salon that they looked at fucked their workers out of money. Every one. Even Walmart isn't that evil. |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
I've seen this sort of thing, when working at a legal clinic -- an illegal immigrant essentially has no protection. Which, in turn, means that legal residents are competing with people who are willing to be paid in snails and ass-rapings. |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
http://www.addictinginfo.org/wp-cont...ld-Laborer.jpg On a happier note, the Rangers won last night. Seems like a lot of OT and low scoring games in the playoffs this year. |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: Where life is beautiful all the time
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
I couldn't begin to fathom how to write or enforce such a law, but their policies on hiring and limiting hours should be criminal |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Wonking
Not too bad for two weeks away, eh?
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
But working at a big box retailer is very different from working in a nail salon. At least places like Walmart pretend to obey the wage and hours laws. Maybe it's just the apparent willful disregard of those laws by the salon owners (as described in the article) that got to me. And the fact that, even when the workers win, they never collect. Anyway, Earnest Not Bob will try to get off of the topic. |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
I won't engage again, unless someone here posts something more than kumbayah. |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
TM |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
But while i see that demand for cheap manicures in some part helps create a market for corner cutting regulations to keep the price at $10, I just don't see how the law of unintended consequences applies to the nail salons - do you have a regulation or law in mind that has hurt the salon workers? Also, I think it's too simple to say that customer choice of cars in the 1970s caused our current situation - though I agree that the shift for Chevy to Toyota was in the mix. But I'm old enough to remember that Detroit didn't really want to put out smaller and more fuel efficient cars, and the ones they did at first (Pinto, Vega) sucked. And while many would blame the unions for cost issues leading to crappy cars, it wasn't the guys and gals in places like Flint who were designing or marketing cars. They didn't create the mantra of "planned obsolescence" which was a business scheme that guaranteed that my mom's Maverick would break down and need replacement in 4 years, while Mr. Johnson's Datsun kept running like a clock until the salt-drenched winter roads of the Ancestral Homeland caused the body of the poor thing (a B-210, I think) to disintegrate at 150,000 miles. But at some point, the American consumer became less interested in buying American, and I think the last TV made in the US was by Zenith in the early 1980s. You are completely correct that the loss of American manufacturing (and the jobs it provided) is the root of the problem. I can't buy a TV made in the USA anymore, but I can buy shoes (Allen Edmond), suits (Hickey Freeman or Hart Shaffner & Marks), and sometimes shirts (Nordstrom, Brooks Brothers - but look at label). But even that is hard, because thanks to Casino Jack and Tom DeLay, swear-shops on certain Pacific Islands have the right to use the "Made in USA" label. And thanks to my dad and uncles, I've mostly owned cars/SUVs from one of the Ford brands (though I think some were made in Canada, but that's practically same, right?). |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
That's why I think we need to change our entire agricultural policy to stop subsidizing hedgerow-to-hedgerow corn and beans and start subsidizing a resurgence in the family farm. |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
Yes, we have to watch for currency manipulation, and have decent wage laws that are enforced. But overall, lower prices are not bad, and having poor people do shitty manufacturing work is not bad. The car plants show that sophisticated value-added manufacturing can be done here. And that the real problem with the auto industry was far less due to workers getting paid a decent amount, but to execs building crappy cars. |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
And you don't think that the choices American car companies made in the 70s, of continuing to produce gas guzzlers and shitty cars, had anything to do with their loss of position? Of course you don't. You are Hank. |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
Edit: and the designs may well have been part of the choice, but then companies didn't need to buy US Steel, Japanese steel was fine. And electronics then became fair game too. Did US steel company owners make poor design decisions? We're US TVs somehow the wrong kind? |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
Do you think non-unionized workers in the US could have competed with third-world manufacturing in the 1970s? That non-unionized auto workers in Detroit could have competed with Mexican labor? There are certainly unions who demanded too much and didn't see what globalization would do to their bargaining power. (That is notwithstanding that union demands helped build the middle class and move away from the gross overexploitation that had persisted before, and was such a factor in the depression.) But to suggest that unions are the only thing limiting US ability to compete with third world labor, in labor-intensive industries, is nonsense. Do you attribute the fact that so much electronics manufacturing moved to Korea, and then to China, to the overreaching demands of those powerful Japanese trade unions? And the powerful Korean unions? Did Nike move to Vietnam to avoid Chinese unions? |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
Of course, $15 was worth more then. |
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
|
Re: I'm too appalled for a lyrical re line.
Quote:
I don't know where you got that I was bashing unions, but Rave On! |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com