LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=879)

sebastian_dangerfield 12-12-2016 04:10 PM

Re: Ever wonder why the Nihilists were Russian
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 504519)
That's total BS. It's folks like you, bourgeoisie, nihilists, partisans, trying to speak on behalf of the working class.

Screw that, we all know what Dude speaks on behalf of the working class.

Nihilist? My immediate family member with a chronic illness, one requiring significant management (w/o which this person dies horribly) might disagree.

sebastian_dangerfield 12-12-2016 04:13 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504518)
I see from a good source on Twitter that the Republicans' plans for the ACA threaten:

12 million new Medicaid recipients
9 million on subsidies
52 million with pre-existing conditions

Odd that our conversation focuses so much on the 9 million, and so little on the other 64 million. It's almost as if the conversation is not animating by the actual effects on real people, but on the notion that someone without money is getting something they don't deserve.

Possibly because the groups overlap and so your numbers, and your point on which they're based, are off?

sebastian_dangerfield 12-12-2016 04:15 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504497)
That ratio doesn't tell you anything at all -- it's apples and oranges. One is a cost and the other is a change in a rate of increase, and different people are spending the money in each case.



I believe what I said is that you were repeating a trope that explained the way a lot Trump voters think, and I still think that's true.



The ACA did a bunch of things all at once. If you are going to pretend that the things that raised revenue and saved money didn't exist, then you're never going to admit that the whole thing worked from a budget perspective. I don't get why you're so insistent that those other parts of the ACA didn't exist, or that they're not important, or something.

I decide to but a new house, and sell the one I own now. You tell me, you can't afford that house! It's much too expensive. I say, yeah, it's a lot of house, but if I sell the one I'm in then I can afford it. You reply, this deal really isn't about the old house, it's about the new house, and you can't afford the new house.

I get it. You don't like the new house. Stop pretending it has anything to do with the budget.

Except you're underwater on the first house.

sebastian_dangerfield 12-12-2016 04:18 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504507)
The only people complaining about the ACA are Republicans, and they're doing it for partisan reasons. Normal people care about their healthcare, not about the ACA, and they have all sorts of complaints. They want the government to make the healthcare system work better. Unfortunately for them, Paul Ryan and Republicans on the Hill are more interested in cutting taxes for the wealthy, and have an ideological opposition to using the government to make the healthcare system work better.

If I did this kind of politics for a living, I would be appealing to Trump to protect ordinary people from Paul Ryan and the House Republicans.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...reases/486674/

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 12-12-2016 04:29 PM

Re: Ever wonder why the Nihilists were Russian
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504521)
Nihilist? My immediate family member with a chronic illness, one requiring significant management (w/o which this person dies horribly) might disagree.

If you can't get a Lebowski reference you can't speak for the working class.

sebastian_dangerfield 12-12-2016 04:32 PM

Re: Ever wonder why the Nihilists were Russian
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 504525)
If you can't get a Lebowski reference you can't speak for the working class.

Fuck. I hang my head in shame.

And that was soooo obvious.

I must leave now in embarrassment.

Tyrone Slothrop 12-12-2016 05:16 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504523)
Except you're underwater on the first house.

It's OK, Sebby. To pay for that first house, I'm going to work a little overtime and I'm going to lease a Kia instead of the BMW.

- But you can't afford that first house!

Hey, with the overtime and the Kia, I can totally make the payments work.

- I'm not talking about your job and your car! This is about housing. You can't afford the first house.

Tyrone Slothrop 12-12-2016 05:17 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504524)

Exactly.

Tyrone Slothrop 12-12-2016 05:18 PM

Re: Ever wonder why the Nihilists were Russian
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 504525)
If you can't get a Lebowski reference you can't speak for the working class.

Because the Coen brothers are nothing if not the spokesmen of the proletariat.

Hank Chinaski 12-12-2016 11:44 PM

Re: Ever wonder why the Nihilists were Russian
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504529)
Because the Coen brothers are nothing if not the spokesmen of the proletariat.

Exactly.

Adder 12-13-2016 11:50 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Not that any of you need my endorsement, but you must read TNC.

Tyrone Slothrop 12-13-2016 12:18 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Of all of Trump's appointees so far, the one that worries me the least is Tillerson at State, because he seems the most likely to be practical and competent and not an ideologue.

Adder 12-13-2016 12:33 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504532)
Of all of Trump's appointees so far, the one that worries me the least is Tillerson at State, because he seems the most likely to be practical and competent and not an ideologue.

Don't really have an opinion about the man, but "long time oil exec" doesn't really scream "qualified to be our top diplomat" to me.

ETA: And I'm not sure oil interests need an even more prominent say in our foreign policy.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 12-13-2016 12:33 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504532)
Of all of Trump's appointees so far, the one that worries me the least is Tillerson at State, because he seems the most likely to be practical and competent and not an ideologue.

What do you base this on? I don't have a feel for the man yet.

I certainly have a distaste for some of how Exxon Mobil has conducted its business, including its current dispute with the Mass. AG, but the CEO may or may not have much to do with that.

Tyrone Slothrop 12-13-2016 01:07 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 504533)
Don't really have an opinion about the man, but "long time oil exec" doesn't really scream "qualified to be our top diplomat" to me.

ETA: And I'm not sure oil interests need an even more prominent say in our foreign policy.

As an oil exec, he has presided over a big, complicated, international organization, under the scrutiny of shareholders. Trump is appointing many people who look like they will be completely out of their depth in running a large organization. I think Tillerson has to understand that he will need to rely on subordinates and trust their expertise.

Agree that oil interests don't need more of a say, but I was going to differ with Trump on that score in any event, and I expect that Tilllerson is taking the job to be the Secretary of State, not the Secretary of Oil.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 504534)
What do you base this on? I don't have a feel for the man yet.

I certainly have a distaste for some of how Exxon Mobil has conducted its business, including its current dispute with the Mass. AG, but the CEO may or may not have much to do with that.

I don't know anything about him personally, so maybe I'm completely wrong. But setting ideology aside, look how many of the people Trump has appointed are going to be in jobs completely unlike anything they've done before? Priebus, Flynn, Devos, etc. Pruitt and Perry at least have state experience, but even that is not always that helpful. You'd think it was all about white entitlement, but Carson is equally unqualified for HUD.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 12-13-2016 01:58 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504535)
As an oil exec, he has presided over a big, complicated, international organization, under the scrutiny of shareholders. Trump is appointing many people who look like they will be completely out of their depth in running a large organization. I think Tillerson has to understand that he will need to rely on subordinates and trust their expertise.

Agree that oil interests don't need more of a say, but I was going to differ with Trump on that score in any event, and I expect that Tilllerson is taking the job to be the Secretary of State, not the Secretary of Oil.



I don't know anything about him personally, so maybe I'm completely wrong. But setting ideology aside, look how many of the people Trump has appointed are going to be in jobs completely unlike anything they've done before? Priebus, Flynn, Devos, etc. Pruitt and Perry at least have state experience, but even that is not always that helpful. You'd think it was all about white entitlement, but Carson is equally unqualified for HUD.

I'm not overly worried about managing the bureaucracy for the top spot and more worried about policy perspective: the view of international affairs from someone who has learned it through the oil industry can be problematic, especially when dealing with the Middle East and Russia. Oil is a big piece of why we work so hard to help the Saudis screw up stuff, even while they provide mammoth support for terrorism, especially in other MENA countries.

On the other hand, I suspect a big part of the job over the next four years will be trying to ease things after his boss stirs up a shit storm (see, e.g., Taiwan). Oil may well prepare him for that kind of crisis management.

But, you know, this is where a good vetting in hearings might educate us all on how he'll do.

sebastian_dangerfield 12-13-2016 01:58 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504532)
Of all of Trump's appointees so far, the one that worries me the least is Tillerson at State, because he seems the most likely to be practical and competent and not an ideologue.

2. Particularly given John Bolton, a neocon buffoon of the first order, will be the likely deputy secretary (probably as a smiling nod in Netanyahu's direction).

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 12-13-2016 02:01 PM

Re: Ever wonder why the Nihilists were Russian
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504526)
Fuck. I hang my head in shame.

And that was soooo obvious.

I must leave now in embarrassment.

I think the clip of those Russian nihilists is going to be very useful over the next four years. Which one do you think is your boy Trump? I think he's the tall one, Putin the one in charge, and the short guy is Assad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AEMiz6rcxc

"We fuck you up!"

sebastian_dangerfield 12-13-2016 02:30 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504527)
It's OK, Sebby. To pay for that first house, I'm going to work a little overtime and I'm going to lease a Kia instead of the BMW.

- But you can't afford that first house!

Hey, with the overtime and the Kia, I can totally make the payments work.

- I'm not talking about your job and your car! This is about housing. You can't afford the first house.

Inapt.

1. 10mil who can pay something but are precluded due to pre-existing conditions can be brought into the current system with a mix of cost cutting and creative risk pooling.
2. Another 15mil who w/o pre-existing conditions who can pay something can be brought into the system with a mix of cost cutting and creative risk pooling.
3. 30mil more who cannot pay anything, some of whom have pre-existing conditions, cannot be brought into the current system with a mix of cost cutting and creative risk pooling. They blow up the equation every time -- even in a nimble system like the ACA.

Expand Medicaid for group 3, and create a separate system for them. Use a mixture of cross-state risk pooling, cost-cutting, and tax increases to allow groups 1 and 2 into the private system.

Everybody gets care, and the best parts of the ACA are preserved.

sebastian_dangerfield 12-13-2016 02:33 PM

Re: Ever wonder why the Nihilists were Russian
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 504538)
I think the clip of those Russian nihilists is going to be very useful over the next four years. Which one do you think is your boy Trump? I think he's the tall one, Putin the one in charge, and the short guy is Assad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AEMiz6rcxc

"We fuck you up!"

That's a hard guess, but one thing is certain: "White Russian" takes on a whole new connotation.

Yes, that was too easy. But it had to be done.

ETA: Trump is "my boy" like happiness is Morrissey's favorite emotion.

sebastian_dangerfield 12-13-2016 02:43 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 504533)
Don't really have an opinion about the man, but "long time oil exec" doesn't really scream "qualified to be our top diplomat" to me.

ETA: And I'm not sure oil interests need an even more prominent say in our foreign policy.

He's been to more countries than 90% of people in DC, and worked out deals in extreme circumstances. He's also run a corporation bigger than the state dept, and worked in a sector where he has to think truly long term. I think it's a decent pick, and welcome it, as it avoids Bolton getting the slot, and neutralizes him if he gets the Deputy slot.

Adder 12-13-2016 02:44 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504537)
2. Particularly given John Bolton, a neocon buffoon of the first order, will be the likely deputy secretary (probably as a smiling nod in Netanyahu's direction).

I believe I saw a statement from Rand Paul along the lines of "no admin position for Bolton, period." I hope he follows through.

sebastian_dangerfield 12-13-2016 02:51 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 504542)
I believe I saw a statement from Rand Paul along the lines of "no admin position for Bolton, period." I hope he follows through.

The man's a fucking idiot. A dangerous, war mongering idiot.

Fuck the entire Irving Kristol* crowd. Pack of truly nihilist traitors, with absolute shit for brains.



_____
* Bill's dad, and the architect of Neoconservatism.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 12-13-2016 03:04 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504544)
The man's a fucking idiot. A dangerous, war mongering idiot.

Fuck the entire Irving Kristol* crowd. Pack of truly nihilist traitors, with absolute shit for brains.



_____
* Bill's dad, and the architect of Neoconservatism.

Yeah, gee, it might have been a good idea to vote against them, huh?

I got to catch up recently with a friend who was part of the Obama NSA, and he reports that the Trump transition team has a very serious hard-on for Iran.

sebastian_dangerfield 12-13-2016 03:13 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 504545)
Yeah, gee, it might have been a good idea to vote against them, huh?

I got to catch up recently with a friend who was part of the Obama NSA, and he reports that the Trump transition team has a very serious hard-on for Iran.

Get different friends.

Tyrone Slothrop 12-13-2016 03:16 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504539)
Inapt.

1. 10mil who can pay something but are precluded due to pre-existing conditions can be brought into the current system with a mix of cost cutting and creative risk pooling.
2. Another 15mil who w/o pre-existing conditions who can pay something can be brought into the system with a mix of cost cutting and creative risk pooling.
3. 30mil more who cannot pay anything, some of whom have pre-existing conditions, cannot be brought into the current system with a mix of cost cutting and creative risk pooling. They blow up the equation every time -- even in a nimble system like the ACA.

Expand Medicaid for group 3, and create a separate system for them. Use a mixture of cross-state risk pooling, cost-cutting, and tax increases to allow groups 1 and 2 into the private system.

Everybody gets care, and the best parts of the ACA are preserved.

ZOMG. From a budget standpoint, the ACA -- meaning the legislation that was passed, including both the parts that you describe here AND other stuff that you haven't described here -- did not "blow up the equation" because other stuff you haven't described covered the costs of what you do. If you only talk about the new house I'm buying and ignore the other stuff I do to balance my own budget, of course I can't afford the new house.

SEC_Chick 12-13-2016 03:18 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504537)
2. Particularly given John Bolton, a neocon buffoon of the first order, will be the likely deputy secretary (probably as a smiling nod in Netanyahu's direction).

Conservative news outlets have been reporting for a couple days that Bolton got shut out of everything. But seriously, I'd pick Bolton for Undersecretary over Roger Ailes.

I am generally pleased with the cabinet appointments so far in that while they in no way are close to whom I would pick, they exceeded my expectations and could have been far worse. Like Secretary Palin or Hannity.

I think Ben Carson is definitely a weak pick, and I do not care for Tillerson as SoS. I used to work for an Exxon competitor, and we always held Exxon up as very like our own company, but well run and with decent management. But Trump is clearly an idiot, despite his assertion that he is "like, a smart person" and doesn't need intelligence briefings. [Don't get me wrong. It is probably better that Trump not get the security briefings] But his unwillingness to call the annexation of Crimea an act of aggression, and his unthinkable statements regarding NATO, and the Russian influence among his confidants and advisers (as Manafort supposedly still has influence behind the scenes) are pretty concerning.

I don't think Tillerson is the guy to stand up to Putin.

OTOH, I find it hilarious how severely Dems, led by Obama, mocked Romney when he said that Russia was the biggest international threat, but now the Russians have rigged the election against the great Hillary of the Reset Button!! I am enjoying the reaction almost as much as I am to the Democrats rediscovering the Constitution and separation of powers and the importance of the filibuster in Presidential appointments.

Icky Thump 12-13-2016 03:26 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
http://i.faketrumptweet.com/1giqk0copp_j2wz99.png

ThurgreedMarshall 12-13-2016 03:55 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504532)
Of all of Trump's appointees so far, the one that worries me the least is Tillerson at State, because he seems the most likely to be practical and competent and not an ideologue.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 504533)
Don't really have an opinion about the man, but "long time oil exec" doesn't really scream "qualified to be our top diplomat" to me.

ETA: And I'm not sure oil interests need an even more prominent say in our foreign policy.

And isn't Bolton going to be doing all the dirty work? That guy is fucking crazy.

TM

Adder 12-13-2016 04:10 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504546)
Get different friends.

The Trump administration is almost certainly going to try to go to war with Iran, largely on the same pretext as Iraq - they're bad and that's all that matters. Heck, we know they've tried to get WMD!

Right now the GOP seems unlikely to really try to stop them, even though it will cost millions of lives, trillions of dollars and has zero chance of a good result (i.e., a remotely stable alternate government in the foreseeable future).

Adder 12-13-2016 04:13 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SEC_Chick (Post 504548)
... But seriously, I'd pick Bolton for Undersecretary over Roger Ailes.

... they exceeded my expectations and could have been far worse. Like Secretary Palin or Hannity.

I mean, sure, he could have picked empty personalities with no experience, and aside from Carson seems to have avoided that. But that's such a low bar.

Tyrone Slothrop 12-13-2016 04:20 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SEC_Chick (Post 504548)
OTOH, I find it hilarious how severely Dems, led by Obama, mocked Romney when he said that Russia was the biggest international threat, but now the Russians have rigged the election against the great Hillary of the Reset Button!! I am enjoying the reaction almost as much as I am to the Democrats rediscovering the Constitution and separation of powers and the importance of the filibuster in Presidential appointments.

In analogous circumstances with the party affiliations reversed, lefties would get offended at the hypocrisy shown by the other side. Which is pathetic in its own way. Conservatives don't dwell on the hypocrisy, but take great pleasure when lefties are bothered by something. The schadenfreude is also pathetic. I think it's more pathetic, actually, but then I'm a lefty.

ThurgreedMarshall 12-13-2016 04:34 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504554)
In analogous circumstances with the party affiliations reversed, lefties would get offended at the hypocrisy shown by the other side. Which is pathetic in its own way. Conservatives don't dwell on the hypocrisy, but take great pleasure when lefties are bothered by something. The schadenfreude is also pathetic. I think it's more pathetic, actually, but then I'm a lefty.

I think her post is a fucking joke. Republicans took it to unprecedented levels with filibusters and obstruction to keep Democrats from governing. Why the fuck they think Democrats shouldn't block absolutely everything they want (especially appointments--if it were up to me, they wouldn't get to appoint anyone until everyone Obama put up is approved) is beyond me.

TM

sebastian_dangerfield 12-13-2016 04:40 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 504551)
The Trump administration is almost certainly going to try to go to war with Iran, largely on the same pretext as Iraq - they're bad and that's all that matters. Heck, we know they've tried to get WMD!

Right now the GOP seems unlikely to really try to stop them, even though it will cost millions of lives, trillions of dollars and has zero chance of a good result (i.e., a remotely stable alternate government in the foreseeable future).

On what basis do you reach this conclusion? Because uber-hawk Rex Tillerson - the man everyone is concerned would value oil suppliers' interests over US interests - is going to run out and start a war which would screw up oil rights and supply lines in the middle east? Or that he won't be able to contain Bolton?

We're going to attempt to resume sanctions on Iran. Will that work? Will it backfire? Who knows. Will tensions increase? Hell yes. But we're not going to initiate a war with Iran. That's tin foil hat talk.

sebastian_dangerfield 12-13-2016 04:46 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 504559)
I think her post is a fucking joke. Republicans took it to unprecedented levels with filibusters and obstruction to keep Democrats from governing. Why the fuck they think Democrats shouldn't block absolutely everything they want (especially appointments--if it were up to me, they wouldn't get to appoint anyone until everyone Obama put up is approved) is beyond me.

TM

If the Dems don't repay GOP obstructionism with their own, they don't deserve to ever have any kind of power. I expect and welcome them doing so because, if that's how checks and balances are going to work in our nihilist political climate, then the necessary obstructionist checks should and need to be applied by both parties.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 12-13-2016 04:50 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SEC_Chick (Post 504548)
OTOH, I find it hilarious how severely Dems, led by Obama, mocked Romney when he said that Russia was the biggest international threat, but now the Russians have rigged the election against the great Hillary of the Reset Button!!

Ah, you do realize don't you that Obama signed the Russia sanctions bill? I know, reality sucks when in gets in the way of your biases.

As to the Constitution, you should really discover it too someday. We know your party's leader never will.

Adder 12-13-2016 05:09 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504560)
On what basis do you reach this conclusion? Because uber-hawk Rex Tillerson - the man everyone is concerned would value oil suppliers' interests over US interests - is going to run out and start a war which would screw up oil rights and supply lines in the middle east? Or that he won't be able to contain Bolton?

We're going to attempt to resume sanctions on Iran. Will that work? Will it backfire? Who knows. Will tensions increase? Hell yes. But we're not going to initiate a war with Iran. That's tin foil hat talk.

Wait and see, but Flynn is a nutjob who seems to want it, Mattis seems to have an interest in it and Bolton will certainly not oppose. ETA: And Trump wants to tear up the deal.

SEC_Chick 12-13-2016 05:53 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 504562)
Ah, you do realize don't you that Obama signed the Russia sanctions bill? I know, reality sucks when in gets in the way of your biases.

As to the Constitution, you should really discover it too someday. We know your party's leader never will.

Mocking somebody's idea and then stealing it and taking credit when it turns out to be right. Not exactly a bias unless you point out where Obama acknowledged Romney was right on that issue.

The GOP did try to work with Obama, but at the first meeting when they tried to make a suggestion, they were told that elections had consequences. And remember the budget deal that was reportedly busted by Obama moving the goal posts after an agreement had been reached? After that, of course there will be obstructionism. I would be the last to argue that McConnell and Boehner didn't suck. Ryan sucks less, but keep in mind that many of those Red State representatives were doing exactly what they were elected to do my their constituents. What will your reaction be to hearing that we have to pass the replacement for Obamacare for you to find out what is in it? Or with the gamesmanship regarding the Wheeler and the FCC?

I thought at the time it was shortsighted to fail to approve qualified appointees like judges, but it was also shortsighted to make unjustified recess appointments and muck with the appointment filibuster rule, and while I would hope that the GOP would change it back, I understand why they wouldn't. The GOP are total hypocrites too. If they thought a foreign power influenced an election for a D win, they'd speak of nothing else.

At this point the system is pretty much screwed forever. Unfortunately the only thing that would possibly get both parties to work together would be a Pearl Harbor or 9/11 event.

Pretty Little Flower 12-13-2016 05:58 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 504562)
As to the Constitution, you should really discover it too someday.

I would like to discover the Constitution someday, too. In my visions, I imagine myself discovering it in a treasure chest, nestled in an enormous pile of gold coins and jewelry, buried in a beach at the spot marked on a faded scroll of a map with an elaborate X, and guarded by four rainbow unicorns wearing red baseball caps. Here's the Skull Snaps with "I'm Your Pimp" for the Daily Dose:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ri4paYFz-h4

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 12-13-2016 06:12 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504560)
We're going to attempt to resume sanctions on Iran. Will that work? Will it backfire? Who knows. Will tensions increase? Hell yes. But we're not going to initiate a war with Iran. That's tin foil hat talk.


Here's my prediction (I hope it proves wrong).

When Trump starts losing some domestic battles or embarrassing himself in one way or another, he'll get increasingly bellicose on foreign policy. His favorite targets are going to be Iran and China. They will respond to his escalation with escalation, expecting it to lead to rational discussions before anything crazy happens, but will instead get crazy. And Iran is an easier target for a bully than China.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com