![]() |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Merry Christmas to all, even the idiots. May you enjoy the Funk as you dance on the grave of the Republic!
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
"Thought: There was (rightly) a cloud of illegitimacy over Bush, dispelled (wrongly) by 9/11. Creates some interesting incentives for Trump" You can make that crazy, but only by jumping to your own crazy conclusions. Meanwhile, Alex Jones, who Trump lauds, says Sandy Hook didn't happen. Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
We'll see if Trump stands up to them. I kinda doubt it. |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/12...ttlements.html
Why would they do this now? Seems a short sighted slap at a key friend that Obama said he supported. |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
But then again, to the GOP and certain Jewish groups* in the US, any disagreement with Bibi is anti-Semetism, so ... *Like Trump's proposed ambassador to Israel, who calls Jewish groups opposed to Bibi "kapos" -- the term for the Jews who cooperated with the Nazis during the Holocaust. |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
edit 2011 veto https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-cal...134545510.html |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
2. By "history lesson" do you mean my point about how Not Unconditionally agreeing with Bibi is anti-semitic? Or that I explained the definition of the slur used by the next US ambassador? 3. I did answer your question - Obama directed Power to abstain because there was a Security Council vote being held and that's the way he wanted to handle it. 4. And if the issue hasn't come up for a SC vote since 2011, then when would it have been too late in his administration to cast a vote (or to Not Veto) such a resolution? Any time after 1/1/2016 because it is an election year? And what is the US policy change you mean? Not saying that the settlements are illegal and the should t be expanded, because that is and has been for a long time current US policy. Or do you mean the policy of giving the Israeli government veto power over our UN vote? I do agree with you that it is a good idea generally to avoid anything controversial between the election and the inaguration. It probably would have been prudent to not rock the boat now and maybe it does seem petty. And I'd probably feel differently if I agreed with Chuck Schumer on the issue. Anyway. |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
2. Calm down. Every single one of you. Calm the fuck down. 3. Fuck you. 4. Fuck me? No, scotch! 5. What? 6. I said scotch. Do I need to spell it out for you? Here, for a special Christmas Eve Daily Dose is the Jive Turkeys with "Get Down Santa." Happy Holidays! Unless my saying happy holidays offends you, in which case bite me. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBkV-gmyr7w |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
Up until now, despite Netanyahu's atrocious behavior, Obama has kept the Israel/Palestine issues out of the UN and in the hands of the quartet or other ad-hoc international bodies. The last security council resolution the US allowed to go through happened 11 days before Obama's term began, and was one of 8 during the Bush II years. No US President has allowed fewer resolutions than Obama since the occupation began. Obama's approach during the last eight years is probably best viewed as a last-ditch effort to save Oslo, but Oslo was doomed by Israeli domestic politics. There is no replacement peace process. Throwing it back to the UN rather than leaving it to Putin and his new sidekick, Trump, seems wiser than the alternative, if your goal is to simply avoid fucking it up even worse for four years. Ultimately, whether a peace process can take hold is going to be entirely dependent on Israel (wisest words on Israel ever spoken were when Bob Dole gave them his phone number and told them to call him when they were ready), and the international community simply can't force the issue in any useful fashion. Netanyahu, by cutting off significant ties to the rest of the world, is cooperating in the project of side-lining the dispute. Best thing the international community can do is to just try to keep the endless Israel/Palestine conflict from destabilizing surrounding countries (and visa versa - the new Russian naval port in Syria is going to be an issue for a long time to come). |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
I'm betting fine Bordeaux outperforms the market significantly during the Trump years. Probably even more than luxury real estate, where if Trump isn't careful he'll scare off all those Chinese buyers into the US market. |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
We've probably not had an incoming President with the same "Fuck you and Fuck US Policy, too" attitude toward the President ever. Lincoln and Buchanan certainly had the rockiest of all transitions ever, but Lincoln was still more respectful of the man who was spending the transition complaining about the union falling apart but not doing anything about it. There really isn't anything to transition to right now, just a great big morass of promises to shit on existing policy with no policy to replace it. Don't worry, though, post-inauguration we'll get filled in on who we're going to war against. |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Special snowflakes in Moscow upset that US might get in the way of the next Aleppo, hopes Comrade Trump will reverse bipartisan defense bill.
What's the over/under on Trump picking up the baton here, and helping the Moscow snowflakes out? |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPSDQygm4dI |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kk_8v5CNsBg |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Obama needs to stop trying to counter Putin. Today's debacle was a new low. We look like fools, and Putin looks like he's just toying with a despearate lame duck. (And Trump will reflexively undo all of the symbolic sanctions, just to demonstrate he cannot be put in a box by Obama or the GOP Congress.)
Leave on a high note, Mr. President. You've immense domestic popularity. But you cannot play on the same court with Putin. |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
The idiot Republicans in Congress are all saying, "finally, you should have done this earlier on Russia," though they've had plenty of power to levy sanctions themselves, and potentially more meaningful sanctions. It's the old "the food tastes awful but I want bigger portions" gang. Let's see what they come up with to follow on Obama's sanctions. Anything that slows Putin down now is a good thing, because he's going to be partying like it's 1721. |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
But it was probably a much smarter move to just avoid Putin altogether. Why leave any flank open by screwing around with the guy? Preferable to dryly tell the media, "Well, Putin is Trump's problem, or bestie, from now on... Good luck with that." |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
Америка первым! |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
He'll piss off some of the GOP Congress. But that'll be minimal. The Lindsey Graham part of the GOP is in exile. No one cares what they think. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com