LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=879)

sebastian_dangerfield 12-31-2016 11:06 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 504787)
Isn't that the point?

Not if Trump does it decisively. Obama assumes he's dealing with other politicians. Trump and Putin aren't on his chessboard, and he cannot force them to play by the customary rules.

If Trump spits in his and the GOP Congress's eyes on this, it'll be terrible precedent. "Unpresidented," as Trump would say.

sebastian_dangerfield 12-31-2016 11:08 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 504786)
Look, I don't care if you want to crawl in between V.&D. and do the fluffing, but if you're approach to this is to fanboy Putin instead of focusing on his hacking of the election and the PEOTUS' dismissal of it, don't expect a whole lot of 2s.

Америка первым!

When a thing's done well, it's credited. Regardless of actor.

sebastian_dangerfield 12-31-2016 11:12 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 504789)
I don't understand "setting up" the next President. For what?

Perhaps because the new President is openly cheering on Obama's adversary, Putin? Obama is entitled to take any action he likes to thwart enemies of the state until Jan. 20.

Tyrone Slothrop 12-31-2016 01:36 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504785)
Come on. Objectively, Putin volleyed that perfectly. There's no getting around that fact. Giving him the opportunity to do so was error.

What Putin did essentially confirms the hacking. So we all have that.

I am curious about something, though. Has it even entered your mind that Obama might be acting out of his own longer-term sense of what is best for the country, rather than how he might win the headlines? To call your posts myopic would be kind, because it would suggest some vision is involved.

Tyrone Slothrop 12-31-2016 01:38 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504790)
He'll piss off some of the GOP Congress.

The GOP Congress is primarily scared of Trump.

Hank Chinaski 12-31-2016 01:44 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504794)
What Putin did essentially confirms the hacking. So we all have that.

I am curious about something, though. Has it even entered your mind that Obama might be acting out of his own longer-term sense of what is best for the country, rather than how he might win the headlines? To call your posts myopic would be kind, because it would suggest some vision is involved.

I've become frustrated with finding out the "truth" about most anything on the internet. What is it likely Russia did?

1 Hacked and leaked actual email that Hil should have been more careful about? (still wrong but just trying to understand)
2 Made up shit and leaked it?
3 Something else?
4 Actually actively changed votes somehow?

Tyrone Slothrop 12-31-2016 01:54 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 504796)
I've become frustrated with finding out the "truth" about most anything on the internet. What is it likely Russia did?

1 Hacked and leaked actual email that Hil should have been more careful about? (still wrong but just trying to understand)
2 Made up shit and leaked it?
3 Something else?
4 Actually actively changed votes somehow?

1 - yes
2 - yes
3 - surely yes (but 1 and 2 are the big ones)
4 - no

Hank Chinaski 12-31-2016 01:59 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504797)
1 - yes
2 - yes
3 - surely yes
4 - no

#3 Cite please

Tyrone Slothrop 12-31-2016 02:06 PM

for Icky
 
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C0-ciARVEAMIRB5.jpg

Tyrone Slothrop 12-31-2016 02:08 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 504798)
#3 Cite please

"Something else" is a very broad category. It's pretty clear that Russia has armies of Twitter accounts, but I don't think that's really in the same league as 1 and 2.

Icky Thump 01-01-2017 03:45 AM

Re: for Icky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504799)

Really good.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 01-02-2017 10:37 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 504796)
I've become frustrated with finding out the "truth" about most anything on the internet. What is it likely Russia did?

1 Hacked and leaked actual email that Hil should have been more careful about? (still wrong but just trying to understand)
2 Made up shit and leaked it?
3 Something else?
4 Actually actively changed votes somehow?

Missed this thread.

We don't know all of what went on, but the most public intel has been released by crowdstrike, a private security operation that assisted the DNC in their forensic efforts. There is also now an FBI/DHS report out.

Both confirm that hacks have been directed against not just political organizations but also governmental organizations and private individuals. Crowdstrike identified hacked entities as including the White House, State Dept., and Joint Chiefs of Staff. Crowdstrike identifies the hackers as including two organizations that are likely Russian government affiliated, Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear, that have each been active over an extended period of time. We also know that Republican party affiliates have been hacked. Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear are both well known in the security world.

So we know the hacks go beyond Podesta and the DNC. Podesta, the DNC and a few republican emails are the main ones that were the subject of orchestrated leaks, but there is likely a trove of documents that were accessed but not leaked.

The "leaked" Hillary emails didn't come from a hack; there is no evidence that the Russians ever accessed Hillary's emails. They came from emails released during the investigation that wikileaks organized (by pulling out everything referencing Iraq, for example).

As to the "made up shit", we also know that the leaked emails were interspersed with made up emails.

I haven't heard any proof of hacking to actually change votes cast on machines.

As far as what we don't know, we have no idea what the governmental hacks got them, or what they are sitting on from their Republican hacks. And while we know details of what trojan horses were planted when and where at the DNC, we don't have detail on exactly what they did in the White House, State Dept., or Joint Chief's systems.

Adder 01-02-2017 10:37 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 504796)
1 Hacked and leaked actual email that Hil should have been more careful about?

Hank, you're a smart guy, how can you be making this mistake at this point?

The hacked emails came from the DNC and Podesta's gmail. There was nothing for Hillary to be more careful about wrt to them.

But she used to have a server so "emails."

Adder 01-02-2017 10:42 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 504802)

As to the "made up shit", we also know that the leaked emails were interspersed with made up emails.

Not sure this is true. There were some reports of it, but thing they wound up wrong/not well substantiated.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 01-02-2017 10:42 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 504803)
Hank, you're a smart guy, how can you be making this mistake at this point?

The hacked emails came from the DNC and Podesta's gmail. There was nothing for Hillary to be more careful about wrt to them.

But she used to have a server so "emails."

Part of why we need a solid public investigation into this. But I'm betting the Republicans keep the investigation behind closed doors.

But expect every Trump administration statement on Russian hacking to include a reference to Hillary, no matter how irrelevant.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 01-02-2017 10:53 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 504804)
Not sure this is true. There were some reports of it, but thing they wound up wrong/not well substantiated.

My understanding was that both Podesta and the DNC said emails were altered, but that they aren't releasing the unaltered ones to the general public, just the security agencies. Republicans keep telling them they should release them to the general public. Because it's always nice to see your opponent's internal communications.

But the security folks also have said altering emails is consistent with how these players have acted when they've done this elsewhere (like there was a big Turkish release).

sebastian_dangerfield 01-02-2017 03:39 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 504796)
I've become frustrated with finding out the "truth" about most anything on the internet. What is it likely Russia did?

1 Hacked and leaked actual email that Hil should have been more careful about? (still wrong but just trying to understand)
2 Made up shit and leaked it?
3 Something else?
4 Actually actively changed votes somehow?

1. No. They never found her stuff.
2. Probably.
3. Lots of that. They hacked everything they could.
4. Yes. The hacked DNC emails detailing how the party was screwing Bernie did some serious damage. Loads of otherwise Hillary voters stayed home or voted for Johnson or Stein. (But it was probably a wash when you counter how many voters Trump lost because of the timed Access Hollwood leak.)

This far away from it, it seems a pretty fair race. On HRC's side you had WaPo/CNN/Boston Globe/Times (the usual media that lean left). On Trump's, you had Wikileaks/Fox (sort of)/Right wing blogosphere/Hackers. They just about balance each other.

I only say "pretty" fair because I can't say fully. Comey's involvement taints the whole thing.

sebastian_dangerfield 01-02-2017 03:43 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 504806)
My understanding was that both Podesta and the DNC said emails were altered, but that they aren't releasing the unaltered ones to the general public, just the security agencies. Republicans keep telling them they should release them to the general public. Because it's always nice to see your opponent's internal communications.

But the security folks also have said altering emails is consistent with how these players have acted when they've done this elsewhere (like there was a big Turkish release).

If they could prove significant alterations, they'd release those emails.

There are some alterations, but I'd be surprised if they were of any consequence, or in any of the Wikileaks that received serious mainstream media attention.

sebastian_dangerfield 01-02-2017 03:52 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 504803)
Hank, you're a smart guy, how can you be making this mistake at this point?

The hacked emails came from the DNC and Podesta's gmail. There was nothing for Hillary to be more careful about wrt to them.

But she used to have a server so "emails."

You know what'd be a great article? One where a reporter tried to determine how many emails Hillary typically sent a day. I'll bet it's next to zero.

I'll bet of those 30k emails she deleted, 1-2 thousand were hers. And that's being generous.

She's out on the road raising money, doing events, being Secretary of State. And she's nearly 70. How many people do you know at that level, at that age, who are constantly sending out emails on their blackberries or iphones?

How many hours a day do you think she spent at a computer? Maybe ten minutes, if she was lucky?

Hillary had people to do her emailing for her, and she knew there was little to be gained, and perhaps much lost, in putting anything down in print when you're at her level, and constantly under attack.

I'll bet we already have most of those 30k emails. The hackers have probably hit enough people on enough of the chains on which Hillary was a recipient to virtually recreate everything deleted from her server.

sebastian_dangerfield 01-02-2017 09:32 PM

Taibbi on the Russian hacking, or lack thereof: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...stinks-w458439

Adder 01-03-2017 11:04 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504807)
On HRC's side you had WaPo/CNN/Boston Globe/Times (the usual media that lean left). On Trump's, you had Wikileaks/Fox (sort of)/Right wing blogosphere/Hackers. They just about balance each other.

This may be the dumbest thing you've ever said.

Adder 01-03-2017 11:07 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504809)
How many hours a day do you think she spent at a computer?

Well, she had a blackberry, but yeah.

TAL had a good overview of the email issue, based on a reading of all of the FBI interview summaries. Conclusion: Team Hillary was technologically incompetent, not nefarious (yeah, source).

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 01-03-2017 11:11 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 504810)
Taibbi on the Russian hacking, or lack thereof: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...stinks-w458439

Great. An article that cites Intercept but not Crowdstrike.

Pretty Little Flower 01-03-2017 11:48 AM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 504811)
This may be the dumbest thing you've ever said.

It seems like someone says this about one of Sebastian's posts pretty much every week or two these days. I find it hard to believe that, each week, Sebastian is able to surpass the dumbness (or craziness, or whatever) of all of his previous posts ever. Nobody is that good. I guess this is a long way of saying that I recommend that we curtail the hyperbole a bit for 2017. And now, it's the first Daily Dose of 2017! A sweet 1969 cut from Lee Dorsey called "Give It Up." After the gospel-like opening piano chords, you may think to yourself that the backing band is TOTALLY ripping off some Meters riffs. And you would be right if it were not for the fact that the backing band is The Meters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jh3cygQeZ1E

Hank Chinaski 01-03-2017 12:05 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
http://www.freep.com/story/money/car...oday/96102086/

More jobs saved!

Tyrone Slothrop 01-03-2017 01:05 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower (Post 504814)
It seems like someone says this about one of Sebastian's posts pretty much every week or two these days. I find it hard to believe that, each week, Sebastian is able to surpass the dumbness (or craziness, or whatever) of all of his previous posts ever. Nobody is that good. I guess this is a long way of saying that I recommend that we curtail the hyperbole a bit for 2017. And now, it's the first Daily Dose of 2017! A sweet 1969 cut from Lee Dorsey called "Give It Up." After the gospel-like opening piano chords, you may think to yourself that the backing band is TOTALLY ripping off some Meters riffs. And you would be right if it were not for the fact that the backing band is The Meters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jh3cygQeZ1E

Yes, let's TOTALLY curtail the hyperbole.

Anyone else reading the Springsteen memoir?

Tyrone Slothrop 01-03-2017 01:06 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 504815)

The way things are going, you're going to see more people holding down two jobs just to make it all work.

Hank Chinaski 01-03-2017 02:00 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504817)
The way things are going, you're going to see more people holding down two jobs just to make it all work.

why do you see this as low paid jobs? Ford is usually pretty well paid.

Tyrone Slothrop 01-03-2017 02:04 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 504818)
why do you see this as low paid jobs? Ford is usually pretty well paid.

If Trump keeps creating so many jobs, there are going to be more than one for each of us, so some people are going to have to do two. Or there.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 01-03-2017 02:22 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504817)
The way things are going, you're going to see more people holding down two jobs just to make it all work.

Wait until you see how many jobs are created building the wall. We're going to have to let in more Mexicans just to get it done.

Tyrone Slothrop 01-03-2017 02:51 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 504820)
Wait until you see how many jobs are created building the wall. We're going to have to let in more Mexicans just to get it done.

Also this.

Replaced_Texan 01-03-2017 03:07 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504816)
Yes, let's TOTALLY curtail the hyperbole.

Anyone else reading the Springsteen memoir?

I gave it to my mom for Christmas. I'm sure I'll get it back once she's done with it.

ThurgreedMarshall 01-03-2017 03:28 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 504756)
So that might be why to do it a year ago, but now? Isn't it almost petty? I mean it will have no effect other than to record that Obama wasn't all that happy with Israel after all.

Good. Fuck Netanyahu. I'm sick of his bullshit. I hope he shows up to the inauguration and all the photos of him with Trump are tied around his neck forever. He needs to go.

TM

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 01-03-2017 03:53 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 504823)
Good. Fuck Netanyahu. I'm sick of his bullshit. I hope he shows up to the inauguration and all the photos of him with Trump are tied around his neck forever. He needs to go.

TM

Here's the thing, Netanyahu will be gone soon, likely under a very dark cloud. Who knows, when his prison time is up maybe he'll come back and join the Trump administration.

And whoever replaces him will likely be even worse.

Right now it's all just a holding action for a time when there is the ability to do something. Most likely, at that point, we'll be looking at a one state solution and talking about the extent to which Israel can limit Arab voting and participation and whether they can keep Gaza out of the state.

Pretty Little Flower 01-03-2017 05:21 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504816)
Yes, let's TOTALLY curtail the hyperbole.

Anyone else reading the Springsteen memoir?

I was surrounded by Springsteen lovers in high school and never really got it then, and was tainted by the HS inundation ever since, so I avoided him to the extent possible.

Tyrone Slothrop 01-03-2017 05:33 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower (Post 504830)
I was surrounded by Springsteen lovers in high school and never really got it then, and was tainted by the HS inundation ever since, so I avoided him to the extent possible.

This was me until a few years ago, when I finally got far enough away from the Springsteen lovers to start liking his stuff. There is that one co-worker, but you can get him to change gears to talk about hockey pretty quickly.

Hank Chinaski 01-03-2017 05:43 PM

Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 504831)
This was me until a few years ago, when I finally got far enough away from the Springsteen lovers to start liking his stuff. There is that one co-worker, but you can get him to change gears to talk about hockey pretty quickly.

So you think the Flower sock has the capacity for personal growth? Are you a newber?

For flower to listen to Bruce S. you'd need to find a bar in Bushwick that only plays his music. Actually, it would heave to be in Bed-Stuy. Forgot it is 2017.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 01-04-2017 09:26 AM

Re: The 70s was an ugly, ugly place
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower (Post 504830)
I was surrounded by Springsteen lovers in high school and never really got it then, and was tainted by the HS inundation ever since, so I avoided him to the extent possible.

You youngsters had it easy. I had to deal with the Led Zepplenites.

Pretty Little Flower 01-04-2017 11:09 AM

Re: The 70s was an ugly, ugly place
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 504833)
You youngsters had it easy. I had to deal with the Led Zepplenites.

I was more of a Led Zepplenite.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 01-04-2017 11:40 AM

Re: The 70s was an ugly, ugly place
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower (Post 504834)
I was more of a Led Zepplenite.

Say it ain't so. No Patti Smith? Grandmaster Flash? Gil Scott Heron? Devo?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com