| sebastian_dangerfield |
04-08-2019 04:03 PM |
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
(Post 522150)
Well, yeah. My employees are hurt by ACA, so is my family. But ACA wasn't passed intending to do harm against me. It was intended to help others, and the harm to me was collateral and worth it*.
Your argument might be better directed to pollution control- you can argue more control helps the air, and hurts companies. And vice versa.
But I think adder meant the flat out hate, where the only "benefit" is no fags/immigrants/etc. Not a possibly good benefit that Ty and I might disagree about, but just hate?
*not worth it in my opinion, but in the minds voting for it.
|
I get that. But even if you consider multipliers (friends in PE make arguments that ACA has huge multiplier, and it might, but it also encourages employers to use more contractors and pare hours, keeping many people part time rather than full), somebody is paying to subsidize it.
Now, you and I aren’t going to freak out about that. The increased cost is small.
But imagine you’re the guy who’s feeling the impact, in terms of not having had a full time job, or struggling to pay for a plan while others are effectively fully subsidized. This is where Trump finds his sweet spot. He plays the struggling against the hopeless. When I hear a well heeled person chiding freeloaders, I know that’s just meanness. But when you see these Trump followers arguing, “Where’s my safety net? Why does a guy doing nothing get covered using dollars I’m struggling to pay for my plan at a job that avoids hiring full time employees in part because of the ACA?” you see what I think is the hidden Trump voter.
You can tell these people that people getting effectively free care under the ACA are a rounding error, but I don’t think that resonates. You can tell them greedheaded corporate managers are the real problem, but they have no power to challenge those sorts. The people with whom they can take issue are the truly destitute receiving govt benefits which they think should be given to them.
I was trying to tease this point out with the Adder exchange, but never got there. Those with some significant assets and income enjoy subsidies. Those with nothing enjoy subsidies. Those just staying afloat seem to be bypassed in re most of the useful subsidies. I think that’s the essential Trump voter.
I imagine the ACA architects probably factored in backlash from people like Hank. Turns out he didn’t care. I’ll bet they didn’t consider the possibility the law would pit the middle class against the truly destitute.
|