LawTalkers
Page 80 of 334 « First 30707879 80 818290130180 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Towards A Virtual Williamsburg! (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=868)

sebastian_dangerfield 02-25-2013 09:19 AM
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 477213)
Benny, really, that guy you met in Lake Como last weekend doesn't love you, and he's not really an artist.
The pope commissions the report, then gets blackmailed with it? By who? Does the report find that this gay conspiracy has been blackmailing the pope in the past? If so, then why the fuck would the pope have commissioned the investigation and report?

Is the pope gay? Again, if this is the case, he'd be asking for a report finding he's gay because...?

These questions could run for a long time. What isn't in question is that Gawker's quality of writing has dropped like a fucking stone.

I'm all for a bait and switch headline, but for God's sake, Mr. Denton... At least request coherence. This story could have been distilled to, "Gays are in the Vatican. Yes, of course, you knew that. Everyone on Earth knew that. But there are lots of them. Maybe more than you think. And they had something to do with the pope resigning. We're not sure what, but it might be something. Or it might not be. Either way, we thought you'd like to see the following formula in narrative form:

Pope + Report that may or may not exist + Gays in the Church + ????? = Forced resignation."

Sidd Finch 02-25-2013 10:24 AM
Re: Do I dare to eat a peach?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 477217)
<golf clap>
At least one person understood what I was saying.

ThurgreedMarshall 02-25-2013 11:15 AM
Re: Do I dare to eat a peach?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 477221)
At least one person understood what I was saying.
Yes, of course. The person who agreed with you was the only one who understood your highly complex point.

TM

Sidd Finch 02-25-2013 11:29 AM
Re: Do I dare to eat a peach?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 477222)
Yes, of course. The person who agreed with you was the only one who understood your highly complex point.

TM
"golf-clap" doesn't mean agreement. It means she knew I was talking about True Love. And Mawwiage.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 02-25-2013 11:49 AM
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 477219)
The pope commissions the report, then gets blackmailed with it? By who? Does the report find that this gay conspiracy has been blackmailing the pope in the past? If so, then why the fuck would the pope have commissioned the investigation and report?

Is the pope gay? Again, if this is the case, he'd be asking for a report finding he's gay because...?

These questions could run for a long time. What isn't in question is that Gawker's quality of writing has dropped like a fucking stone.

I'm all for a bait and switch headline, but for God's sake, Mr. Denton... At least request coherence. This story could have been distilled to, "Gays are in the Vatican. Yes, of course, you knew that. Everyone on Earth knew that. But there are lots of them. Maybe more than you think. And they had something to do with the pope resigning. We're not sure what, but it might be something. Or it might not be. Either way, we thought you'd like to see the following formula in narrative form:

Pope + Report that may or may not exist + Gays in the Church + ????? = Forced resignation."
Sebby, Sebby, Sebby....

You preach coherence out of the Vatican?

[Golf clap].

ThurgreedMarshall 02-25-2013 01:59 PM
Re: Do I dare to eat a peach?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 477223)
"golf-clap" doesn't mean agreement. It means she knew I was talking about True Love. And Mawwiage.
Boo. Boooooo! BOOOOOOOO!

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 02-25-2013 04:46 PM
Top 20
 
Please welcome back Jarah Mariano.

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=1615

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=1616

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=1617

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=1618

TM

bold_n_brazen 02-25-2013 05:41 PM
Re: Do I dare to eat a peach?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 477222)
Yes, of course. The person who agreed with you was the only one who understood your highly complex point.

TM
Also, probably, not one to be respected on matters of love and mawwiage.

Hank Chinaski 02-25-2013 06:31 PM
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 477219)
The pope commissions the report, then gets blackmailed with it? By who? Does the report find that this gay conspiracy has been blackmailing the pope in the past? If so, then why the fuck would the pope have commissioned the investigation and report?

Is the pope gay? Again, if this is the case, he'd be asking for a report finding he's gay because...?

These questions could run for a long time. What isn't in question is that Gawker's quality of writing has dropped like a fucking stone.

I'm all for a bait and switch headline, but for God's sake, Mr. Denton... At least request coherence. This story could have been distilled to, "Gays are in the Vatican. Yes, of course, you knew that. Everyone on Earth knew that. But there are lots of them. Maybe more than you think. And they had something to do with the pope resigning. We're not sure what, but it might be something. Or it might not be. Either way, we thought you'd like to see the following formula in narrative form:

Pope + Report that may or may not exist + Gays in the Church + ????? = Forced resignation."
the problem might be this simple: perhaps the Oath of office to become a Priest doesn't include a promise to forgo all sex, just sex with females over the age of majority. If only Atticus still posted so we can get an answer:confused:

ltl/fb 02-26-2013 04:18 PM
Grow lights query
 
Heavily heat-producing or cool?

Fugee 02-26-2013 04:32 PM
Re: Grow lights query
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ltl/fb (Post 477240)
Heavily heat-producing or cool?
Sounds like it depends on the type of bulb you use.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 02-26-2013 04:44 PM
Re: Grow lights query
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ltl/fb (Post 477240)
Heavily heat-producing or cool?
The plants you want to grow can get kind of tall, so if you're using hot lamps, you've got to check in on them periodically and make sure they haven't started to burn. That odor can bring the boys to the yard iykwimaikyd.

ThurgreedMarshall 02-26-2013 05:52 PM
Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=1619

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=1620

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=1621

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=1622

TM

Sidd Finch 02-26-2013 06:43 PM
Re: Top 20
 
Nicely done. Except for the scary creature in the last pic of section 3.

Hank Chinaski 02-26-2013 08:46 PM
Re: Top 20
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 477251)
Nicely done. Except for the scary creature in the last pic of section 3.
So masturbation is part of your trial prep? Remember, Adder looks up to you for guidance.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 PM.
Page 80 of 334 « First 30707879 80 818290130180 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com