![]() |
Reverend Greenspan
Quote:
|
Lets talk about sex baby
Quote:
|
Color is the New Black
Quote:
The article tickled me because it reminded me of my teens and early twenties when my high-falootin society aunt would visit us in the provinces and declare: "purple is the new neutral" or "red is the new neutral." The needle has been stuck on "black is the new neutral" for a very long time. Last year, with the bohemian thing, you saw a lot more white and color than had been seen in a long time. Still, I doubt I will see many people dressed as if for the easter parade wandering around downtown. Given the present economic circumstances, I am far more likely to buy a new pair of shoes than a new ensemble. My shopping is mostly limited to two big overhauls a year (spring and fall), rather than shopping two or three times a month. Even(my personal shoppers miss me)Odds |
Ariel, Izzat you?
From cnn.com, the nation's most trusted and unbiased news source:
NEW YORK, New York (Reuters) -- New York City has to fork out $10,000 for arresting a woman who appeared topless at the 2001 Coney Island Mermaid Parade, her lawyer said Wednesday. The 31-year-old Brooklyn woman, Amy Gunderson, wore only a thong and body paint at the annual Mermaid parade and sued the city for violating her First Amendment rights after police arrested her. "A woman has a constitutional right to appear in public topless, the same right that men have," her lawyer, Ron Kuby, said. The city settled after the charges against Gunderson were dismissed. City lawyer Deborah Meyer said the city "makes business decisions every day" and it was "in our best interest to settle." Kuby said Gunderson planned to make an encore appearance at this year's parade. He did not say whether she would be wearing a shirt or not. |
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
As I recover from the first round of the playoffs, I thought that it would be interesting to revisit an old topic -- namely, whether your spouse or significant other or insignificant other (or all three) knows about us.
You know, the FB. Home of salacious talk with imaginary friends. Or about the related PMs, IMs, emails, etc. And, per the rules for these sorts of polls, I'll go first. Not Bob's Answer is No. I wrestle with this, because I don't think that anything I do or say on the FB (or via IM or email) rises to the level of being in the same zip code as Conduct Contrary To Monogomous Wedded Bliss, as measured by objective standards. But (and this is a-bigger-than-J. Lo's "but"), my wife wouldn't like it. None of it. Men and women, chatting on the computer? Egad. Talking about the things that are discussed here? (See eg the kama sutra thread) Yoikes. So I rationalize that it's like a bad habit that one doesn't share -- like the secret cigarettes or shots of heroin that some spouses hide from the other. Yeah yeah yeah, I know -- it's self-justifying rationalization. |
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Quote:
Speaking of heroin and sharing, here's another story liberated from (yet attributed properly to) CNN.com: STAMFORD, Connecticut (AP) -- You have the right to remain silent, but what if you vomit evidence before police read you your rights? Vincent Betances wants his drug-dealing conviction thrown out, arguing that eight bags of heroin he threw up after emergency medical treatment should never have been admitted into evidence. He contends police illegally seized the evidence from an ambulance after asking him if he'd swallowed heroin -- but before reading him his rights. The state Supreme Court heard arguments in the case Wednesday and is expected to issue a ruling this summer. . . . . While handcuffed and in a police cruiser, Betances began sweating profusely, turned pale and had difficulty breathing. Betances admitted he had swallowed four bags. A paramedic gave Betances a medication to prevent the body's absorption of the drugs. A short time later Betances threw up eight bags of heroin, which an officer seized. Assistant State's Attorney Toni Smith-Rosario argued that police should not be penalized for protecting the public, including defendants in their custody. "Most defendants are grateful when police save their lives," Smith-Rosario said. Suzanne Zitser, a public defender representing Betances, countered that exceptions to the Miranda warning must satisfy stringent requirements. "It's not even a close call in this case," Zitser said. "There was no threat to the public or police officer safety." Wouldn't this fall under the Plain View Doctrine? |
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Yes, the OddMan knows about the FB.
I have sent him posts I have written about him, notably his drunken exploits in the old Dude, Where's My Car poll. |
AI - Thank You America (But you're still stupid)
Quote:
|
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Quote:
|
AI - Thank You America (But you're still stupid)
Quote:
|
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Quote:
I seem to remember a case where the police offered the suspect a cigarette, and the suspect left the butt in the ashtray of the police car. The police then took it and had the suspect's DNA extracted from the cigarette and used that evidence to convict. The court basically held that if the police did not do this with the intent to coerce the defendant to give up evidence, it was allowed. I'll try to find the cite. |
AI - Thank You America (But you're still stupid)
Quote:
And he's not untouchable. Look at what's left. Besides, the judges are starting to try to manage the outcomes. I believe Simon may have said last night as Josh and Carmen were standing there, that neither one had a chance of winning the competition. He's out next week. You read it here first. |
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Quote:
|
AI - Thank You America (But you're still stupid)
Quote:
I am simply floored that Carmen and Josh made it as far as they did. Although it was fun cheering when they finally hit a correct note. That one time. |
AI - Thank You America (But you're still stupid)
Quote:
|
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Quote:
|
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Quote:
|
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Quote:
And, no, he doesn't know about the secret cigarettes, either. AM(oh, come on, honey...it's just a little harmless fun, kinda like porn)M |
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Quote:
I know no other posters and thus do not send PMs and emails. But if I did engage in the exchanging of risque and flirty PMs to female posters (which I believe is pretty harmless) I sure as shit would not tell my wife about it. But of course I am also a secret cigarette smoker so perhaps this is not surprising. |
Not to Burst Your Bubble, But . . .
Quote:
When the OM falls off the wagon, I know. I sometimes choose not to mention it, but it's a little hard to hide the aroma from clothes or hands, no matter how careful you think you are being. |
Match Dot Com
Quote:
Or so I have heard. not7yS |
Not to Burst Your Bubble, But . . .
Quote:
In the first case she doens't get the chance to smell the smokey clothes/breath, and in the second case she's always half asleep in bed when I get home and fully expects me to smell smokey. So let me re-phrase, I am an incredibly infrequent secret cigarette smoker. |
Not to Burst Your Bubble, But . . .
Well, you are smooth.
I thought it was funny that two of you posted about secret smoking in consecutive posts, so my comments were more generally directed toward all the secret smokers. |
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Quote:
|
The Bachelor
Does anyone think the one side in/one side out tuck job Andrew sports will catch on? I think I did that with my oversize tops in 1987, usually with stirrup pants and keds. Sometimes I would wear my socks UNDER my stirrup pants and sometimes OVER my stirrup pants. I was young and stupid and it was the '80s. What is Andrew's excuse?
I totally heart Tina Fabulous. Cocky as hell. And both my parents are from Oconomowoc. |
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Quote:
I don't know about telling people I run the damned thing though. How will I explain that one? Well honey, you see, I waste an incredible amount of time running and posting on this board...do I get paid? No, no I don't get paid?...Credit? No, no, it has to be anonymous...but I have a very famous moniker? How is it famous? Oh it has been quoted in newspapers, isn't that cool? Why? Oh well, you know, I'm just kinda fucked up that way. I think I'll keep it to myself. :rolleyes: |
The Bachelor
Quote:
http://abc.abcnews.go.com/primetime/...ios/TinaP.html |
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Quote:
f(now STOP it!)b |
The Bachelor
Quote:
|
The Bachelor
Quote:
Thanks, Paigow. |
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Quote:
|
The Bachelor
Quote:
|
The Bachelor
Quote:
|
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Quote:
|
The Bachelor
Quote:
She describes herself as "classy," which is a fingernails on the chalkboard thing. I don't watch the show (shocking, I know), but that doesn't bode well for a long-term relationship. Then again, he's pimping himself on ABC supposedly looking for a bride, so I am sure he has a passing familiarity with the word. Edited to add: It's the underlying pretension that is the problem -- for me, anyway. My family would not automatically object to a mate who described themselves as "classy." This discussion reminds me of a conversation MumsyOdds and I had when I was a young(er) woman. I met a young, handsome Chinese diplomat at a party. We exchanged information and, after the party, I excitedly told her all about it and him. Her comment was one of utter shock and dismay. She sputtered: "but he's a Communist." In my family, that was far worse than pretension. |
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
My wife knows about the forums and website. It would be kind of hard for me to be secretive about it. On the other hand, she is not really familiar with the content of what's discussed on the FB. She thinks it's about fashion and other general BS, but I highly doubt she is aware of the amount of sex talk.
|
The Bachelor
Quote:
|
why is tina so fabulous?
Last night was my first glimpse of this incarnation of The Bachelor and so I don't know any of the personalities. All I saw was the rose ceremony, which gets more recockulous and embarrassing every time it happens.
Was Tina the first woman to whom he offered a rose? The blonde with her hair up and the bright red lipstick? If so, I thought she had kind of an ugly mouth; slightly sneery and too big for her face. She also seemed to recoil when after offering her the rose he tried to kiss her; it looked to me like she did a quick cheek turn. What am I missing? And the girl who cried is pathetic. WTF are these 23 year olds doing trying to get engaged? They should be out having flings. |
The Bachelor
Quote:
Or to quote debtslave, "classy isnt". |
Poll -- does your spouse/SO/ISO know about the FB?
Quote:
But he doesn't really get it. The boards themselves or the secrecy. (He once annoyedly pointed out that I wasn't a CIA mole or something when I shushed him from talking about something on the boards on a packed subway.) I do call him from work occasionally to have him do research for me when I'm arguing with someone on politics, however, and he puts up with it (and often gets quite heated in his responses to particularly idiotic posts I read to him). |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com