|  | 
| 
 G-d save our Republic!?!? | 
| 
 An Open Letter to Presidential Candidate Clinton An Open Letter to Hillary Clinton  BY JUANITA BROADDRICK 'DO YOU REMEMBER?' SUNDAY OCT 15, 2000 As I watched Rick Lazio's interview on Fox News this morning, I felt compelled to write this open letter to you, Mrs. Clinton. Brit Hume asked Mr. Lazio's views regarding you as a person and how he perceived you as a candidate. Rick Lazio did not answer the question, but I know that I can. You know it, too. I have no doubt that you are the same conniving, self-serving person you were twenty-two years ago when I had the misfortune to meet you. When I see you on television, campaigning for the New York senate race, I can see the same hypocrisy in your face that you displayed to me one evening in 1978. You have not changed. I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton's bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering. Do you remember? You told the driver, "Bill has talked so much about Juanita", and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying "we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill". At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, "Everything you do for Bill". You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering. What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question. Yes, I can answer Brit Hume's question. You are the same Hillary that you were twenty years ago. You are cold, calculating and self-serving. You cannot tolerate the thought that you will soon be without the power you have wielded for the last eight years. Your effort to stay in power will be at the expense of the state of New York. I only hope the voters of New York will wake up in time and realize that Hillary Clinton is not an honorable or an honest person. I will end by asking if you believe the statements I made on NBC Dateline when Lisa Myers asked if I had been assaulted and raped by your husband? Or perhaps, you are like Vice-President Gore and did not see the interview. Juanita Broaddrick Arkansas | 
| 
 for Penske Since you seem to be bored, here's an interview with Noam Chomsky.  A brief taste (an amuse bouche, if you will): 
 | 
| 
 a plan for Iraq At first blush, this looked more plausible to me than what the President has proposed: http://www.comw.org/pda/0701bm40.html But I haven't read it all. | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 This is perfectly reasonable. If the decision were put to me, this would be my answer in virtually any circumstance. (I say "virtually" because I can imagine a circumstance where there would be an unused office or some other space where I could tell students, "ok -- how about there?"). This makes the answer "no." Not "no, douchebag." Not "no, because you and your kind are destroying Christianity." Just "no". Now, if someone files a lawsuit or leads a protest march over this -- well, then I start saying "douchebag." But the guy in Slave's post seemed pretty reasonable -- he wants to go to games (isn't that good? Don't you prefer that Muslims be integrated rather than segregated?). He wants to pray at the ordained times. He's fine doing that under the bleachers or anywhere else ("not a big deal," or something like that, he said). And he asked -- not demanded, just asked -- for a better option. Big fucking deal. | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 You think any of these things are remotely relevant to whether a student at Northwestern can make a polite request for a place to pray? | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 Well, let's see..... Christmas is no longer a national holiday, is it? You never see crosses in public anymore. They stopped putting big Christmas trees in prominent places, like the White House and Rock. Center. Christians are now a distinct minority in government. The calendar has been changed so that the normal work-week includes Sunday, so that most people can have Friday, the Muslim holy day, off. Or that's the way things are, in Slave-land. | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 Are you okay if they stop to pray, and they do it in a clean place? Or, perhaps you just forgot to post the part ofthe story where the Northwestern students were asking for game times to be changed. | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 You give Slave's point -- "And every time a concession is made - like building a prayer room in an Athletic Arena - it only means a broader request is soon to follow." -- far too much credit. First, no one asked for any one to "build a prayer room." They asked if there was a quiet and clean place where they could pray (and if not, "no big deal"). Second, the "a broader request is soon to follow" line is bullshit. If Northwestern denies the prayer room will al Qaeda stop demanding to turn the world back to the Caliphate? Of course not. Some people make reasonable requests (and respond reasonbly if they are denied). Some people are evil and radical and insane. And some people are in between. But suggesting that one leads to another is absurd -- muslims were making "broader requests" a long time before this Northwestern student came along. Third, even if a broader request were to follow, so what? You address that request on its merits. By Slave's "logic," we should forbid anyone from wearing a crucifix in public -- because next they'll demand to put a huge rock with the 10 Commandments in every courtroom. We should not let a Jew wear a yarmulke in court -- because, first, Christians are so oppressed in this country, and second, next the dirty Jew will demand to pour lamb's blood on the judge's desk. Slave's "clash of cultures" argument is old, old news. People in this country said that about Jews, Catholics, southern Europeans, eastern Europeans, Chinese, etc etc etc. I guess muslims are just the newest nigger -- no individual is bad, they just all are. | 
| 
 Is it just me in here? or is it just me in here? Sorry, all, for the serial posting. I'm listening to MCLE tapes, trying to keep my license past 1/31. And it's goddamn dull. | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Is it just me in here? Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 for Penske Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Is it just me in here? Quote: 
 No. And I saw your apology. Which I appreciate. Especially since you didn't just claim it was a typo. | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Is it just me in here? Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 I'm also fairly certain that many college teams still engage in a shortt team prayer before each game. So drop the bullshit about any threat to Christianity and admit your problem is just blind unthinking hate. | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 for Penske Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 for Penske Quote: 
 | 
| 
 for Penske Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 S_A_M | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 But all of that is completely beside the point. The real issue is whether it was hateful and wrong for Slave to make a big deal out of it. What people are really divided on is whether or not we are infavor of Slave to be using this forum to spread religious or cultural intolerance. ON that issue, there seem to be two schools of thought. There are those who disapprove and are calling Slave on it and those who are beniding over backward to defend his bigotry. With that in mind, let me offer a more apropos hypo. Say you go to MSU games. You have a need to say "fuck all ragheads and camel jockeys" five or six times a night. Suppose other people are offended by that. Should the entire stadium be forced to listen and accept it while you are escorted to the annnouncers' booth to use the public address system to share your message or should you ne encouraged to stick your head up your ass and whisper it? Note that, as on the PB, it has not been suggested that you be prevented from saying it or thrown out of the stadium for doing so. | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 But then, I stopped to consider all the advances in science, mathematics, etc., that have come from federal research grants. I ultimately concluded that I had much less of a gripe about research grants than I do about farm subsidies, tobacco subsidies, cost-plus federal military expeditures contracts, etc. So, on balance, while I see your point about federal money going to private universities, I have to say that I think they produce far more good than harm. | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 Smashing, the new spirit of bi-partisanship is really taking hold........ | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 I illustrated that, in at least one instance, a group of Jewish people choose not to ask for things to be changed to suit them. Adder, that nitwit, mentions his teammate the Mormon. Without intending to, he supports my point also. of course, the fact is that my point was BS since I'm fairly sure Macabee coaches have asked for a no-Saturday schedule. To be honest, I even offered to call and ask for the special schedule. given that reality, what is odd isn't that some kid asked- assuming he was refused- what is odd is that it is treated as a story. And I would say that Slave was probably just a little geeked up by the way the story was spun on the webpage where he probably found it. | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 Yeah, but was that because of Church or the NFL schedule? | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 Like Scalia, Slave is mortally opposed to considering foreign or international law when deciding what the US should do in any circumstance. Oh, wait. I'm confused. | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 Yeah, well. The second or third time I came across the "exploding belt of nails" comment, I couldn't restrain myself any longer. My first draft of a response to that post said something like "and if he's a black muslim, he'll probably mug someone and rape a white woman while he's out." | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Muslim whining of the day, part 67 Quote: 
 | 
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 PM. | 
	Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com