LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Patting the wrists, rolling the eyes. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=661)

Spanky 03-25-2005 05:53 PM

Shame on You
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
If you are a resurgence of any past committee, I don't want your gold star, dear.

I don't remember whether it was you or club who turned in your R party card, but whichever of you did is now eligible to spank me, though.
Club - she is all yours - I am, fortunately or unfortunately, still a card carrying member of the GOP.

bilmore 03-25-2005 05:54 PM

Shame on You
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
This is the funniest thing I have heard in a month! Two Gold Stars.
I've always admired how you can score points in your own mind, facts be damned, sort of like the ability to will yourself into an orgasm.

Tyrone Slothrop 03-25-2005 05:57 PM

Shame on You
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
This may, in fact, be key to my view of the matter. Sushi doesn't have interests. Any "dignity" or "wishes" kinds of interests all reside in the survivors who hold those interests dear, or not.
Then why on earth does it matter whether she signed a paper, as I thought you were suggesting a day or two ago?

bilmore 03-25-2005 05:57 PM

Shame on You
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
I've always admired how you can score points in your own mind, facts be damned, sort of like the ability to will yourself into an orgasm.
And on that note, on to see if I can break my other arm on the bumps.

bilmore 03-25-2005 05:58 PM

Shame on You
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Then why on earth does it matter whether she signed a paper, as I thought you were suggesting a day or two ago?
If it ends up giving the survivors direction, and makes conflict less likely amongst them, it's wonderful.

For the survivors. It's all about them.

Gattigap 03-25-2005 06:03 PM

Shame on You
 
I think you're confusing me with other posters again, bilmore.

Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
I've always admired how you can score points in your own mind, facts be damned,
[Hank]
Quote:

sort of like the ability to will yourself into an orgasm.
[gwinky]


If you don't appreciate my use of callback humor, try Ty's more articulate answer to your question.

If you truly believe that this was a bipartisan Congressional effort -- beyond the literal counting of Democratic votes for it -- then obviously (a) you've been watching Democratic congressmen wax on the Senate and House floor at length over Terri, where I have not, and (b) your interpretetation the GOP "talking points" to be an encouragement of a bipartisan solution, instead of sticking it to the Democrats for the mid-terms, and energizing one's base, is one that I've missed.

Tyrone Slothrop 03-25-2005 06:04 PM

Shame on You
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
If it ends up giving the survivors direction, and makes conflict less likely amongst them, it's wonderful.

For the survivors. It's all about them.
So her wishes only matter if the survivors prefer to be bound by her wishes instead of what they want? It makes sense in a LSAT-logic-problem sort of way, but only in that way.

Gattigap 03-25-2005 06:04 PM

Shame on You
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
If it ends up giving the survivors direction, and makes conflict less likely amongst them, it's wonderful.

For the survivors. It's all about them.
Then they should all be called "Health Care Letters of Intent."

Tyrone Slothrop 03-25-2005 06:11 PM

Shame on You
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
If it ends up giving the survivors direction, and makes conflict less likely amongst them, it's wonderful.

For the survivors. It's all about them.
So the estate tax should be OK, because it doesn't matter what the decedent wanted.

ltl/fb 03-25-2005 06:14 PM

Shame on You
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
So the estate tax should be OK, because it doesn't matter what the decedent wanted.
You can have the gold star, just for this.

LessinSF 03-25-2005 06:16 PM

Asmussen Rules
 
http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/pict...adreporter.gif

Spanky 03-25-2005 06:22 PM

Asmussen Rules
 
Are you going to happy hour?

If so where?

sgtclub 03-25-2005 06:32 PM

Shame on You
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
they hate Hillary for absolutely no good reason other than that she's a strong woman).
They hate Hillary because she tried to take on substantive tasks without being elected to office or approved by the Senate. She was an obnoxious usurper with an attitude that just happended to be a woman. The strong part had nothing to do with it.

sgtclub 03-25-2005 06:34 PM

Shame on You
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Club - she is all yours - I am, fortunately or unfortunately, still a card carrying member of the GOP.
I am too, as of today, but I am seriously considering giving it up.

Gattigap 03-25-2005 06:42 PM

Shame on You
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
I am too, as of today, but I am seriously considering giving it up.
Here ya go.

In Item 7, write "no party."


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com