| sebastian_dangerfield |
03-20-2013 11:49 PM |
Re: So
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fugee
(Post 477733)
The problem with your position is that it makes rape about sex. I think it's fairly well established that rape is about power and control, not sex.
I very much doubt those boys didn't have plenty of opportunity for sex with willing girls.
|
Rape has a sexual element. We don't like to admit that, but hell... we don't like to admit a lot of obvious facts. Most of our society is based on delusions/narratives that allow us to avoid addressing facts we don't like. (I'm a broken record on that point, but am I wrong?)
If it were all about power, and had nothing to do with sexual aggression, these men would just physically abuse women. But they don't. They rape them.
It's not about blunt power. It's about difference. The female victim can be brutalized in a manner a male cannot. Even raping a male, it's not abusing "the difference." The perpetrator is fucking a guy in the ass - an orifice he also possesses. But a woman? In that instance, the rapist is doing something he can't do with any other victim. He's using the sexual difference between him and the victim to inflict a unique pain he can't inflict on anyone but another woman. Sex and power are inextricably interwoven in the act.
Rape's about power, but also sexual aggression. Sexual aggression is, of course, somewhat natural (testosterone, etc.). But when it goes rotten, when its owners are taught women are adverse to male sexual urges, rather than necessary participants in the act who'd like to be more overtly involved but are hemmed in by a culture that calls them whores when they think for themselves in that regard, you get lack of respect for women, which leads to things like Steubenville.
|