LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03 - 10-3-03 (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8)

taxwonk 04-30-2003 10:43 AM

Ladies, Do Not Do This
 
Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze
God no. That's stup.
Actually, Leagl, it's "schtup."


Oh, wait. You were shortening stupid. nevemind.

taxwonk 04-30-2003 10:50 AM

Towards gender-neutral cuss words
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I think one of the arguments is that when you dehumanize someone by reducing them to a body part, it is a grave insult. When you dehumanize them by reducing them to a sexual body part, it is an even worse insult. When you dehumanize them by reducing them to a (gasp) female sexual body part, it is the absolute worst (because in the traditional heirarchy of things, women are below men).

Oh, don't be such a tit.:D

taxwonk 04-30-2003 10:53 AM

Anyone?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by carp
Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary defines douche bag (ca. 1963) as an unattractive or offensive person. My question is, have you ever known a male to be called a douche bag?
When I was in HS, it was the number one insult used among males. Of course, back then a slut was a girl who would fuck anyone and a cunt was a girl who would fuck anyone but you. So apparently the language has changed.

notcasesensitive 04-30-2003 10:54 AM

Towards a new topic
 
Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

Just because we have the right to swear here, doesn't mean we have to turn the derivation of swear words into the longest most overdone topic of all time.

n(fuckin dicks)cs

evenodds 04-30-2003 11:00 AM

Towards a new topic
 
Baskin-Robbins is offering free ice cream tonight . . .

http://www.baskinrobbins.com/new/

Mister_Ruysbroeck 04-30-2003 11:07 AM

Ladies, Do Not Do This
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Does anyone know chicks who shorten words because they think it sounds cool? My wife has some friends who like to cut pieces off words during conversations and it drives me up a wall. For example, they'll say "Mary and I had a convo the other day" meaning "Mary and I had a conversation the other day". Another I heard was the use of the term "vag" for vagina - they seem to think that sounds cute. The worst is when they shorten "whatever" to "whatev" - I can barely hold my tongue when they speak like that to me. I really feel the need to say "Your slang makes you sound like you're challenged, my dear... its not cute". Just an FYI - if you do this word shortening thing, people probably ask each other what the hell is the matter with you behind your back.
If I didn't know better, I'd say your wife and my wife are friends. Her college roommates (all 7 of them) do this shit all the time when they are together. It's so fucking annoying.

ThurgreedMarshall 04-30-2003 11:09 AM

Fashion Causes Political Crisis in S.Korea
 
Quote:

Originally posted by purse junkie
Sure they do. Yes, they are both insults technically referring to genitalia. No, they are not used remotely in the same way. Calling a guy a dick doesn't imply any judgement in particular about his sexuality--as say, "pencil dick" would. I have never, ever heard the word "cunt" used in a way that did not imply something negative about a woman sexually--usually, that she had stepped out her place and was acting like a guy--and with respect to women, sexual terms implying insult or potential harm are often used to put her back there.

It's like the n-word/cracker distinction Not Bob made--refer to an analogous thing, but has completely different history, meaning and implications.
So nice of you to incorporate Not Bob's argument into yours after the fact.

Unfortunately, we still disagree on this:

"I have never, ever heard the word "cunt" used in a way that did not imply something negative about a woman sexually--usually, that she had stepped out her place and was acting like a guy--and with respect to women, sexual terms implying insult or potential harm are often used to put her back there."

Bullshit. Either you're putting too much meaning onto the word or you frequently imagine things.

Every time a woman is called out on her behavior is not an attempt to tell her she has stepped out of her place or is acting like a guy. That's insane. On the whole, when a woman acts like an ass, she gets treated like one, just like everyone else (including black people). The worse she acts, the harsher the insult.

Calling a woman a cunt doesn't necessarily imply "potential harm" and it doesn't refer to a woman's sexual activities. If I call you a cunt (I actually don't use that word, but let's assume I do), I'm not trying to put you back in your place and I don't think you're acting like a guy. I think you're acting like a complete asshole and the gender-specific term (a la "dick") for that is "cunt."

Now, I think in some cases, people who use the term intend to bring up the charged meaning of the word (GWNC/Not Bob's argument). But mere usage of the word does not go as far in my opinion as you think it does. Usage plus overt intent gets you there. And although the analogy Not Bob used (relating it to the word "nigger") is helpful in seeing how it might be used in some cases, it's not the same. "Nigger" is designed and used specifically to reference a certain part of our history. The intent is incorporated into the word. I don't think that's the case with the word "cunt."

TM

purse junkie 04-30-2003 11:12 AM

Towards a new topic
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

Just because we have the right to swear here, doesn't mean we have to turn the derivation of swear words into the longest most overdone topic of all time.

n(fuckin dicks)cs
Okay. I propose a charity drive to raise funds to help Anna Nicole Smith buy the proper underwire support garments (or get the appropriate implant-deflating surgery) to support her enormous rack that is causing her such terrible back pain, thereby helping to alleviate her cleavage-induced Vicodin addiction. We could call it The BOOBS (Breasts On Overdrive Breaking Spine) Foundation.

p(feelin' her pain)j

dtb 04-30-2003 11:12 AM

Ladies, Do Not Do This
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Does anyone know chicks who shorten words because they think it sounds cool? My wife has some friends who like to cut pieces off words during conversations and it drives me up a wall. For example, they'll say "Mary and I had a convo the other day" meaning "Mary and I had a conversation the other day". Another I heard was the use of the term "vag" for vagina - they seem to think that sounds cute. The worst is when they shorten "whatever" to "whatev" - I can barely hold my tongue when they speak like that to me. I really feel the need to say "Your slang makes you sound like you're challenged, my dear... its not cute". Just an FYI - if you do this word shortening thing, people probably ask each other what the hell is the matter with you behind your back.
True confession time, my best friend in college and I would do this all the time (never "vag" or "whatev" though -- those are weird! and we were NOT, I repeat NOT weird! I do, however, admit to using "convo"), and we thought we were so hip -- in fact, I think we thought we invented the whole concept. Hmmm.

Anyhoo -- my friend was explaining to her boyfriend about our charming conversational convention (about how we lopped off syllables from words), and his response was, "Hmm, that's interesting, but what if it's only one syllable, like 'lame'?" She actually started to answer for a second. I think it was shortly thereafter that we seriously curtailed our use of this convention.

One remnant remains, however. And that is the word "natch" -- used only ironically, of course (sort of like "classy").

(If that doesn't call out plf, I don't know what will. I think he's scared of my princess dog.) What a pussy!

Bad_Rich_Chic 04-30-2003 11:14 AM

Towards gender-neutral cuss words
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I don't get where use of cunt went off the rails. Back in Chaucer's time, it was acceptable slang, no? (which I learned when some dork in my English class asked the prof how you pronounce "queinte" and why did that guy grab the Miller's wife there).
I would not take my cues for "acceptable" medieval slang from the Miller's tale (and I believe it was a reeve's wife getting the feel-up of her parts where the long hair hangs all adoun - a miller's wife and daughters were getting diddled by reeves in the Reeve's travelers-bed-swapping-tale). Chaucer was by all accounts a lovely man, but he could have a dirty mouth on him.

The main point of the Miller's tale was that it was so vulgar, obscene and unacceptable, both in language and subject, that the other pilgrims were horrified (amused, but horrified) and shut him up so the Knight could tell one that was prissy and chivalric but also disturbingly wrong. Also, the Miller told the tale to specifically insult the Reeve by calling his wife an unclean ho with a hot cunt that needed to be filled by many young men. (The characters hated each other.)

However, in a more general sense, the medievals were much less prudish about addressing sex, genitalia, shit, farting, vomit, bad breath, supperating pustules, the pleasures of drunkeness, the inability to keep erections (or get rid of them), the lack of satisfaction to be obtained from small cocks and other "vulgar," "obscene" or otherwise unacceptable things directly. We're still recovering from the damage done by Reformation and Victorian morals.

greatwhitenorthchick 04-30-2003 11:17 AM

Towards gender-neutral cuss words
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
I would not take my cues for "acceptable" medieval slang from the Miller's tale
Well now you tell me. I guess this explains why I can't make any friends on my time travelling adventures.

dtb 04-30-2003 11:18 AM

Fashion Causes Political Crisis in S.Korea
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
on the shortening words thing ... I had a roommate in college who called the library "the berry." What a left tail (there was an apparent glitch in the admissions process). I wanted to slap her, for that and so many reasons.

No, no, no, no, no. That's all wrong. As any conversationally challenged person will tell you, the library is appropriately referred to as the "libe". (The "berry"?!? That is just RIDICULOUS!) :rolleyes:

notcasesensitive 04-30-2003 11:23 AM

Towards a new topic
 
Quote:

Originally posted by purse junkie
Okay. I propose a charity drive to raise funds to help Anna Nicole Smith buy the proper underwire support garments (or get the appropriate implant-deflating surgery) to support her enormous rack that is causing her such terrible back pain, thereby helping to alleviate her cleavage-induced Vicodin addiction. We could call it The BOOBS (Breasts On Overdrive Breaking Spine) Foundation.

p(feelin' her pain)j
Speaking of ANS, I saw a pic of her on E Online yesterday and she had light blue metallic eyeshadow all the way around her eyes. Can anyone explain why any woman (I think the particular crowd that likes the look is strippers) would think the eyeshadow under the eye look would be attractive? I just don't get it.

n(perhaps I'm not intended to be stripper-chic)cs

ThurgreedMarshall 04-30-2003 11:28 AM

Fashion Causes Political Crisis in S.Korea
 
Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
No, no, no, no, no. That's all wrong. As any conversationally challenged person will tell you, the library is appropriately referred to as the "libe". (The "berry"?!? That is just RIDICULOUS!) :rolleyes:
In my neighborhood growing up and in junior high, lots of kids called it the "liberry."

These were the same kids that called the player in goal in hockey or soccer, "goldie." As in, "Ooooh oooooh! I wanna be goldie!"

Thurgreed(doubts anyone else here had this experience)Marshall

Anne Elk 04-30-2003 11:29 AM

Towards a Future Topic
 
http://cache.eonline.com/On/Holly/Im...ton.042103.jpg

May 4th at 9pm on E!
Everything you wanted to know about the Hilton sisters and more!!

Set your Tivos.

All the info is at www.eonline.com

leagleaze 04-30-2003 11:29 AM

Towards a new topic
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Speaking of ANS, I saw a pic of her on E Online yesterday and she had light blue metallic eyeshadow all the way around her eyes. Can anyone explain why any woman (I think the particular crowd that likes the look is strippers) would think the eyeshadow under the eye look would be attractive? I just don't get it.

n(perhaps I'm not intended to be stripper-chic)cs
We have an employee here who wears very very heavy eyeshadow. She is also extremely tall, so she stands out anyway.

I think back in the 80s people wore heavy eyeshadow right? But I cannot see why these days, when most people it seems want invisible or natural makeup, anyone would feel the need to wear so much eyeshadow. Not to mention she must spend a fortune on eyeshadow the way she goes through it.

So I can't explain it, I don't get it either. I think it looks very unattractive.

Mister_Ruysbroeck 04-30-2003 11:30 AM

Ladies, Do Not Do This
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I think I'm going to start fooling around behind her back.
Start?

;)

Bad_Rich_Chic 04-30-2003 11:36 AM

Fashion Causes Political Crisis in S.Korea
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
insult.
And although the analogy Not Bob used (relating it to the word "nigger") is helpful in seeing how it might be used in some cases, it's not the same. "Nigger" is designed and used specifically to reference a certain part of our history. The intent is incorporated into the word. I don't think that's the case with the word "cunt."
But if the n-word is not in fact intended that way by the speaker using it, it is still an unacceptable word. What makes the word an unacceptable is the way it's target can be expected to hear it, more than the specific (and unknowable) intent of the speaker. Your (correct) point about the n-word is that intent to bring up a certain part of black history can always be inferred, whether a user might argue that it wasn't intended or not, because, well, everyone knows what it means to the hearer given its historical baggage.

Everyone knows that about the c-word, too. The only question is, does the target of the insult's widely known understanding of the meaning matter? You say no. I say the fact that black people took the n-word "badly" used not to matter either; that was a result of the lack of power blacks had to assert their views on the subject. Surely the white people who used it did not have the right to define what black people were allowed to feel about it, and surely claims of different "intent," even if sincere in a specific instance, should have been met with the derision they eventually received.

And you're nuts if you don't think millenia of history (and widespread current practice) of women being the sexual and child-rearing posessions of men isn't inherently incorporated into the whole concept of verbally reducing a woman to her genitalia.

BR(I called you a "wetback," but I meant it to salute your excellent swimming skills)C

edited to insert a sarcasm siren after that last for the satire impaired

sebastian_dangerfield 04-30-2003 11:37 AM

Ladies, Do Not Do This - Really Annoying Convo Terms
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
If I didn't know better, I'd say your wife and my wife are friends. Her college roommates (all 7 of them) do this shit all the time when they are together. It's so fucking annoying.
MR,

Since we're on this pet peeve of mine (like I need another), these are the most annoying things I hear from my wife's friends:

"He/she/it is so 'ON FIRE'"

- They use this to describe everything, even mundane shit. Is everything that great?

"Fabu"

-Taxwonk said it best - if your wife uses this, leave her.

"I live and die for her/him/it"

- Again, often used to discuss mundane shit, like "Your poodle is fabu... I just live and die for it" or "Bill just lives and dies for Mary". Hyperbole has no punch if its so overboard it becomes absurd.

"Grim"

- Everything that's not "fabu" is "grim".

When I was in school, the library was the "brary". I didn't care too much about that one because I never entered the building until midnight before exams and then only stayed for as long as it took to beg one of my wife's friends for her notes. Luckily, I was considered "fabu" so I got them. I'd have probably flunked if I were "grim".

purse junkie 04-30-2003 11:37 AM

Towards a new topic
 
Quote:

Originally posted by leagleaze
I think back in the 80s people wore heavy eyeshadow right? But I cannot see why these days, when most people it seems want invisible or natural makeup, anyone would feel the need to wear so much eyeshadow. Not to mention she must spend a fortune on eyeshadow the way she goes through it.

So I can't explain it, I don't get it either. I think it looks very unattractive.
Doesn't Barbie have painted on pale-blue eyeshadow? Perhaps she is the source of the stripper aesthetic, head-to-toe. And I think ads for eyeshadow are getting much more colorful--seems to be a disco-influenced revolt against the nude look so perhaps it's coming back. I think all the dark colors though just make someone look like she got punched in the eye.

BTW, your avatar is really disturbing.

evenodds 04-30-2003 11:38 AM

A Question about Strippers
 
That reminds me of a conversation we had at a party recently:

If you can go to one of two strip clubs -- one upscale, the other skanky -- which do you choose and why?

Even(it was better than talking about the economy)Odds

Mister_Ruysbroeck 04-30-2003 11:41 AM

FB Dreams
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Sebby,

Your post just reminded me that I had a dream about you last night. ..
This is so weird, because I also had a dream about FBers last night. Mostly, it involved FBers that I have never met. It was so strange, because these people did not appear in my dream as I typically picture them in my head.

For instance, DebtSlave/BRC was there (with her daughter and some disney videos?!?!?!?) and she had short blond hair, rather than the short brown hair I typically picture her with. TM was there and he was a white guy. Both of them were very nice (almost too nice), which I imagine DS to be, but not TM.

Anyway, it was really weird. Oh, and it was a dinner party with a really odd seating arrangement. And, for some reason, everyone arrived there and left on yellow school buses.

I have no idea what this dream means, if anything. GWNC?

evenodds 04-30-2003 11:43 AM

Ladies, Do Not Do This - Really Annoying Convo Terms
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Since we're on this pet peeve of mine (like I need another), these are the most annoying things I hear from my wife's friends:
Sebby, your wife's friends should be quarantined.

We must stop that nonsense from spreading.

spookyfish 04-30-2003 11:48 AM

Anyone?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by carp
Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary defines douche bag (ca. 1963) as an unattractive or offensive person. My question is, have you ever known a male to be called a douche bag?
I've also heard this applied to males.

It also brings to mind the old SNL sketch, where Buck Henry was Lord Douchebag discussing his most recent invention with Lord Sandwich, et. al.

http://snltranscripts.jt.org/79/79tdouchebag.phtml

Spree: Transcript of Lord and Lady Douchebag sketch.

Lord Salisbury: Spoken like a true Douchebag. I have often heard the King speak of your family.. [ to Earl of Sandwich ] ..and of yours, as well: "Give me a Sandwich and a Douchebag, and there is nothing I cannot do."

ABBAKiss 04-30-2003 11:53 AM

Ladies, Do Not Do This
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I think I'm going to start fooling around behind her back.
You mean like rim job?

notcasesensitive 04-30-2003 11:54 AM

A Question about Strippers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
That reminds me of a conversation we had at a party recently:

If you can go to one of two strip clubs -- one upscale, the other skanky -- which do you choose and why?

Even(it was better than talking about the economy)Odds
Funny you should mention that. I've heard tales of many associates at my firm frequenting strip clubs and their favorites are the mid-level ones (apparently). They don't like the really high end ones because they think the strippers are not adequately impressed by their lawyer status and the rules against touching are more strictly enforced. Of course they don't like the low end ones cause the chicks aren't hot enough. Leaving some midlevel ones where they feel like big shots when they get their lap dances and they basically get some sort of sex equivalent for their $$.

The whole thing is gross to me, but that is what they tell me...

n(lacking the equipment to fully understand)cs

spookyfish 04-30-2003 12:04 PM

FB Dreams
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
And, for some reason, everyone arrived there and left on yellow school buses.

I have no idea what this dream means, if anything. GWNC?

Were these regular buses or "short buses"?

spooky(just wonderin')fish

Anne Elk 04-30-2003 12:12 PM

FB Dreams
 
Quote:

Originally posted by spookyfish
Were these regular buses or "short buses"?

spooky(just wonderin')fish
And why did do many 'small bus' passengers wear helmets?



Yes, I know I'm going to hell. See y'all at the bar.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 04-30-2003 12:15 PM

Anyone?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
When I was in HS, it was the number one insult used among males. Of course, back then a slut was a girl who would fuck anyone and a cunt was a girl who would fuck anyone but you. So apparently the language has changed.
Also the difference between a ho' and a bitch. See Fear of a Black Hat.

Mister_Ruysbroeck 04-30-2003 12:16 PM

FB Dreams
 
Quote:

Originally posted by spookyfish
Were these regular buses or "short buses"?

spooky(just wonderin')fish
Despite all evidence to the contrary, the FBers arrived on regular buses.

Sparklehorse 04-30-2003 12:25 PM

Fashion Causes Political Crisis in S.Korea
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Interesting historical note on the word "faggot." Historically, is was a bundle of sticks, generally used as kindling. In the early part of the 20th century, it was slang for a cigarette in the UK (also elsewhere, but primarily in the UK). It began to be used to refer to homosexuals in Nazi Germany, once homosexuals were starting to be shipped off to the death camps. Its use came about because the unfortunates had a tendency to go up in flames like a .... faggot.

Since running across this little etymological lesson, I have been more inclined to flinch when I hear the word being used. But then, we all know how overly PC I am.
I may have to find some citation to back me up but I think it actually goes back to burning people at the stake in the Middle Ages. But otherwise, absolutely correct in the sickening connotations.

sebastian_dangerfield 04-30-2003 12:26 PM

Towards a Future Topic
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Anne Elk
http://cache.eonline.com/On/Holly/Im...ton.042103.jpg

May 4th at 9pm on E!
Everything you wanted to know about the Hilton sisters and more!!

Set your Tivos.

All the info is at www.eonline.com
The Hiltons each look like Christina Aguilera after a three month dexadrine/laxative bender.

ltl/fb 04-30-2003 12:34 PM

Fashion Causes Political Crisis in S.Korea
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall Thurgreed(doubts anyone else here had this experience)Marshall
Your doubts are misplaced. Not the "goldie" part, as hockey wasn't a sport that people paid any attention to or played in my area of the country. Just the liberry part.

Edited to say: "doubts are misplaced"? "as . . . wasn't"? Who stuck the stick up my ass?

ABBAKiss 04-30-2003 12:41 PM

AI and P. Diddy's band
 
Did I miss the AI convo?

Anyway, Clay has my vote.

Whatever happened to that P. Diddy show on MTV with the wannabe rappers? Who won?

Sparklehorse 04-30-2003 12:42 PM

Prancy redux
 
This very important question got lost in the discussion.

From my perspective (and avatar), I would interpret this to be intended as a compliment like you are sassy and cute. You know, like a little pony!:P

Tyrone Slothrop 04-30-2003 12:49 PM

Towards gender-neutral cuss words
 
I think Robin Williams, under ferocious cross-examination by James Lipton on The Actor's Studio, said that his least favorite word is cunt, and his favorite word is pussy.

Replaced_Texan 04-30-2003 12:54 PM

Puppies, robust and otherwise
 
The Displaced Dog is ten years old. According to the vet, he's in perfect health, and he's got probably another six or seven years left in him. I've been kicking around the idea of getting him a puppy to raise in his image before he gets too old to care about such things. My mom has a one-year-old dog/puppy that I've seen grow up, and the Displaced Dog LOVES playing with the puppy, so I do have a general idea of the what a new puppy would entail. The thing is, it's been ten years since I've had to take care of a puppy. I was still in college when I got the Displaced Dog, and I had a lot more time to spend on him. My rough plan is that I would try to crate the puppy for the first few weeks, move him into the closed off bathroom for the next few, then the kitchen, and then when he's fully housebroken he'd have the same access to the house as the Displaced Dog.

Has anyone gotten a puppy while working full time, with no spouse / live in / roommates? And if so, do you have pointers?

Assume the following:

1.) The Displaced Dog and I live alone. There are family members nearby (one of them works within two blocks of our house), and we are not adverse to the "It Takes a Village" theory, if that's what it takes to have a nicely socialized dog.

2.) We have a nice sized back yard. We probably should go through and make sure that there aren't any holes in the fences or access to under the house for a smallish dog to get through.

3.) I live close enough to where I work that it's not inconceivable that I can come home for lunch maybe two or three times a week, but planning in advance for that may be difficult. The family member that works nearby could also concievably come by to take care of any biological needs.

4.) The Displaced Dog stays in the house all day, between eight and ten hours. No compliants, no accidents, no destruction of furniture, no chewing, no shedding. I think he alternates between the couch in the TV room and his chair in the living room. Sometimes he naps on my bed. I suspect he sleeps for a good portion of the day, but he also chews bones, rearranges the rugs, and spends a lot of time on guard duty. When my mom's puppy comes over, I think that they play a very complicated game of chase. Both seem to be rather exhausted when they've spent the day together.

5.) The Displaced Dog generally doesn't like other dogs, but he adores my mom's puppy, and he spent a lot of time in worship of my mom's other dog. He lives in abject terror of my sister's lab. Both puppy and other dog were Pulik, so I think that the Displaced Dog wouldn't have a problem with another puppy of his own breed so long as he got to establish himself as being the one in charge. (It took him an hour to go from wanting to kill my mom's puppy to playing with it.) He thinks he's an alpha dog, but really he's a beta. I imagine that it wouldn't take very long for the new puppy to figure that out.

Alex_de_Large 04-30-2003 12:55 PM

Just passing through
 
Vibrators are still illegal in Alabama.

sebastian_dangerfield 04-30-2003 12:59 PM

That's My Bush
 
http://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/art...ideo29-ON.html

Alleged video of first daughter nude.

spookyfish 04-30-2003 01:12 PM

American Idol Review
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
Two performances each tonight. This was the best show of the competition because you got to see their range within the same hour. I jotted down some thoughts while the show was on (shut up, Thurgreed).

ruben: ain't too proud to beg. sounded great. showed more style. he has perfect pitch. though i wonder how many cows died to make his outfit.

trenyce: proud mary. i actually clapped when she finished. her best performance of the competition. simon hated it, of course. referred to it as a "drag act."

josh: back to the country twang. sorta.

kimberley: heard it through the grape vine. it was okay. her lack of rhythm will always bother me. she has a nice voice, though.

clay: build me up buttercup: a great performance. it's theatrical, as is he. he did a great job.

ruben: breakin up is hard to do. it was good. i didn't like the arrangement so much, but he was great.

trenyce: love will keep us together: she did fine. i wasn't crazy about it. simon said it was fabulous.

josh: ghastly. he looked like he was forgetting lyrics. and he did the head-bob again. at least he wasn't also wearing a cowboy hat.

kimberley: where the boys are: she sounded better on this. she belts beautifully.

clay: solitaire: "he clayed it up" it seemed very short compared to the others. he has amazing power as a singer.

Overall, i thought the earlier performances were better -- except Kimberley's. Her second song was one of her best performances.

Josh and Trenyce in the bottom two. Josh, Trenyce and Kimberley if they do 3.

Josh should go home.

Responding to bring the post current for ABBA, as well as make a few comments of my own.

I generally agree with all of your comments, except for the bottom two. If they do a bottom 3, I would agree with your assessment.

I looked at it from the standpoint of both performances on balance. I thought Trenyce's both were very, very good. Her best in a long while. I think because she was consistently good, if they have a bottom 2, it will be Josh and Kim. The Marines are going home, thankfully. Josh showed no range, and clearly looks like he doesn't want to be there anymore. He looks beaten, like Carmen did the week before.

Trenyce is stepping up her game. The battle between her and Kim should be especially interesting over the final show(s).

Clay and Ruben are clearly the class of the competition. Clay was very good. Ruben was rock-steady as usual.

About Ruben's first outfit. I couldn't tell at first whether that was leather or a heavier satiny type of material under the lights. Once I determined it was leather, I said to mrs. fish, "Gee, I wonder how many cows sacrificed themselves in the making of that outfit." Then at the end of the performance, Simon made a similar comment. Damn, that Ruben's a big dude.

spookyfish

And along the same lines:
My wife did not start watching this until a couple of weeks ago. She asked me of the significance of "205" last week, and my response was "I don't know, maybe that's what he weighed when he was 10 or something."


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com