LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 120
0 members and 120 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-23-2005, 04:45 PM   #1052
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
classy, classy guy

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
Isn't his statement generally true? It says "liberals" not Democrats. I think of liberals as the anti-war protester clowns that ravage our fair city from time to time.
I consider myself a liberal, and I am fairly confident that you do as well. I completely disagree with what Rove said. I don't know a single liberal who wasn't in favor of direct military action against those responsible for 9/11.

Of course, Bin Laden is still at large. The Saud faamily is still practicing a Wahabbist oligarchy in Saudi Arabia. Basheer Assad succeeded his father in Syria, where more likely than not Bin laden is in semi-permanent residence.

But at least we've spent billions on toppling Iraq while at the same time cutting taxes and programs benefiting the poor, the sick, and the children here at home.

Now, having reviewed where the liberals I know stood on 9/11 and the events taking place since then, please explain to me what part, if any, of Rove's statement was true.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:40 AM.