LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 3,072
0 members and 3,072 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-14-2005, 01:44 PM   #68
NotFromHere
No title
 
NotFromHere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 8,092
Good news Pensk

Your First Amendment rights have been reinstated.

Judge ends 17-year ban on new strip clubs
Seattle moratorium ruled an unconstitutional restraint on free speech.

SEATTLE - The city’s 17-year moratorium on new strip clubs is an unconstitutional restraint on free speech and can no longer be enforced, a judge has ruled.

U.S. District Judge James L. Robart ruled Monday that the city’s rationale for repeatedly extending the ban lacked merit.

The city had argued that the case was not a censorship issue, but that it was waiting for the state and county to adopt new cabaret regulations. It first imposed a temporary moratorium on new adult cabarets in 1988, after the number of strip clubs in Seattle jumped from two to seven (oohhh, jumped clear to 7) over two years.

Still, if the City Council votes next week to adopt a rule banning lap dances, few new strip clubs may open in Seattle anyway. The panel is expected to vote on Mayor Greg Nickels’ proposal requiring exotic dancers to remain 4 feet from their clients.

The plan has drawn protests from the city’s club owners and exotic dancers, who fear it will severely cut into their business.
You think? 4 feet? That's like at Papa Bear's where the guys dance behind the velvet rope. 4 feet seems ridiculous.
__________________
Ritchie Incognito is a shitbag.
NotFromHere is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 AM.