LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 106
0 members and 106 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-08-2003, 11:59 AM   #1360
robustpuppy
Moderator
 
robustpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
MBA inspired question:

Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
No. You should be happy this is all they did. But you shouldn't have even have found that out. If fiance/e told, they are nuts and you shouldn't marry them. If you found out another way and fiance/e didn't flat out deny, they are stupid and you shouldn't marry them. If they cop to the kiss, assume much worse was done.



Yez. Tongue on skin is much worse (depending on what you're licking) than almost-grinding through pants with a stripper (depending on which strip club you go to).

Thurgreed(but of course, the hypocritical oath attaches here)Marshall
Agree with TM. The licking thing is also worse because it is an affirmative act. I might not be bothered by my fiance's failure to physically remove the stripper from his lap, but I would throw his clothes out on the lawn if he failed to keep his tongue away from her AND if he were stupid enough to tell me that he so failed.

There would not be enough Listerine in the world to erase the memory of that. Every time he came near me with his tongue after that I'd think about the cooties. The relationship would then, obviously, be dead.
robustpuppy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 PM.