LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 235
0 members and 235 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-24-2006, 07:03 PM   #3531
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Deadwood parody

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Do you think TM can do the relative thing? Like (and I am not speaking of you, of course, red lingerie girl) considering that someone is not all that, skirt A is more flattering than skirt B? Or would the answer always be "Yeah, you don't look so good in that [because you are not attractive]"?
You can talk directly to me. I don't know what gives you the idea that I can only speak in absolute truths and that I have some kind of impossibly high standard that I apply to women other than Halle Berry and Scarlett Johansson. If someone I thought was generally unattractive asked me if they looked better in one outfit or the other, I could very easily tell them which one looked better on them, which one flatters what and so on. I can even tell if they look nicer one day than they have on other days. I've done it many many times.

In the example that won't die, that is not what was called for. And I think it is unbelievably stupid of you to continue to act like I only think supermodels are attractive, especially when so many of us critique actresses and models (male and female) on almost a daily basis. In addition, I have repeated myself, ad nauseum, w/r/t my theory on ratios. But since you can't hear it, I will fill you in again. A good ratio, even on women who are not skinny, is very attractive. A ratio of 1:1 or worse on a significantly overweight person is not attractive to me. Tough shit. If that's how you look, don't volunteer to be rated.

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 PM.