Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Jesus. This conversation is pointless. The best thing I have to judge the woman's intelligence is what she says. If every statement she makes is a stupid one, I can safely conclude that she is stupid.
TM
|
How do we know your smart enough to make a proper psychological evaluation?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Moron is no longer a technical term as it is applied by anyone in the world. But thanks.
TM
|
I disagree. I have seen some older psychologists and psychiatrists use in clinical settings of respected institutions, although I agree it is generally out of fashion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Jesus. This conversation is pointless. The best thing I have to judge the woman's intelligence is what she says. If every statement she makes is a stupid one, I can safely conclude that she is stupid.
Moron is no longer a technical term as it is applied by anyone in the world. But thanks.
You can't see it because I haven't said it. You're not even arguing anything. You're just talking because [SHOCKER] you like the attention.
The things she says are almost always stupid. She has been given a platform because it amazes people how stupid she is and has still managed to win the nomination. You have ignored the fact that she is stupid (as evidenced by her own words) and have focused on the fact that she has an opportunity to make money. Accepting that opportunity makes her neither smart (unless you're talking to Sebby) or stupid. The two things aren't related and I don't know why you bring them up as if they are.
TM
|
Being able to capitalise on opportunity and talent is smart. Look up the definition of the word. It doesn't mean she's an intellect or can affect analytical thinking or is book smart, but its canny and shrewd.
