LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 105
0 members and 105 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-09-2010, 01:08 PM   #2220
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cletus Miller View Post
If the Dems have any sense (note: feckless idiots, so obv. counter-factual), they'd propose and push thru in the lame duck session a statutory ban on earmarks. Read into the record *exactly* Limbaugh's explanation for why it will work and avoid any temptation to add in statements about needing to restrain the next Congress. Fast track it, do everything to get it enacted, even give credit to the Rs, if necessary. Just end the conversation about it *now*, so that they can force the Rs to move onto their next deficit reduction proposal--which is ... nothing.
I'm on board with this. Good approach. Next thing they should do is tie any extension of the Bush tax cuts (any of them, for anyone) to an extension of the debt ceiling to accomodate the cuts. Any other approach is irresponsible.
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 AM.