LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 241
0 members and 241 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-17-2010, 01:12 PM   #2652
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: Small Government Indeed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
I don't know specifically what he means, but I would assume that the bulk of $84+ billon that he wants to spend is to build new weapon to replace the existing ones.



Especially not when you might be able to extract even more spending then, like the $100+ he wants to spend on planes, boats and submarines.

But part of my point is that this sounds like a situation in which waiting carries some pretty unambiguous national security costs.
waiting between 11/17 and 1/1? I'm not arguing, I know nothing about the treaty or the guy's hang up, but what cost is there in waiting a month and a half?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 AM.