Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Adder, Hank isn't going to talk about this, because he's already told us he's dumb where this issue is concerned.
|
Hank isn't going to talk about it because it's fucking stupid argument. Here's a study from the Brookings Institute outlining some of the costs of nuclear weapon development and deployment:
http://www.brookings.edu/projects/ar...eapons/50.aspx
A lot of them are in 1945-1990 dollars, so you'll have to run the inflation yourself, but I think we can all agree, $84 billion isn't buying shit in terms of new nuclear weapons.
Additionally, I believe we're party to a few treaties under which we've agreed not to build any new warheads, which would provide anther kind of important basis on which to ignore this stupid goddamned debate.
