Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Thanks for the clarification: You are just that big a fucking tool.
|
Okay. Whatever.
The point was Kyl's conduct, not exactly how the money was to be spent. I don't know, I never knew, and I never claimed to know. In fact, I've now had a brief a look at Kyl's webpage and I still don't know. The point is that he wants substantial sums of money to be spent in ways that he directs in exchange for having his party agree to ratify what seems like an important treaty.
Hank says we should be open to the possibility that the Senator has sincere concerns that he feels wouldn't otherwise be met. I'm rather more cynical than that, and you have helpfully provided a more plausible assumption about what the money is for.
Why you think anyone was arguing actually about exactly what the money was for is beyond me.
