LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 358
0 members and 358 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-22-2010, 04:54 PM   #2857
Penske 2.0
Registered User
 
Penske 2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Duchy of Penske
Posts: 2,088
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidd Finch View Post
Well said. Absolutely no portion of airport security is done for security-related purposes. The entire system is a PR campaign. Whether it's full-body scans, metal detectors, x-raying bags, disallowing transport of liquids or matches.... why, it's all just political theater. Not one person in the TSA really cares about security.

You are generally above this kind of "The Government is just a bunch of evil incompetent thugs trying to waste our time and money" meme. What happened -- bad flight this weekend?
I understood your point about distinguishing the policy makers from the enforcement folks on the ground, and it makes sense to me, to a point. the effect of the policy will ultimately be predicated on the ability of the enforcement folks to carry it out competently. they are the lab rats for trial and error, and, while I don't think most, if any, of the TSA officers on the ground are either evil and/or thuggish, I question the competency of most of them, whether it was competency to screen terrorists or competency to empty my wastebasket (and most, if not all, tasks in between).

there's no right or wrong here (at least I don't think that there is), I comfortable with the conclusion that we have different sensibilities and tolerance for the trial and error platform.
__________________
Man I smashed it like an Idaho potato!
Penske 2.0 is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 AM.