LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 244
0 members and 244 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 12-07-2010, 05:29 PM   #3533
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
It sounds like Obama and the GOP cut a deal that got him more stimulus than he was going to get otherwise and got them tax cuts for the wealthiest 3% of the country for a few more years. Dunno what you mean by "essential" -- the tax cuts that the GOP wanted are bad news for all of us who aren't in that 3%, but the GOP wanted them so badly that it sounds like Obama was able to get a lot for them. As a matter of policy, they aren't good, no doubt. As a matter of what was possible, maybe this was better than other options. Maybe.

As I've said about seventeen thousand times, I think we ought to be running deficits right now to make up for the plunge in private production, but tax cuts for the wealthiest are a really lousy way to do it.
so you're saying when Obama tries to work with the Rs he can still get the bulk of what he wants, as long as he realizes that two parties will likely want two different things, and he is willing to give a bit? this is 15 wins.

Hank Chinaski
644-13
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 AM.