Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder
Do you care to explain why? It doesn't seem to fit your persona to believe that all tax cuts always pay for themselves or assume that there is some magic source of future money that isn't the people.
So perhaps you are in favor a future default on government debt? That's the only scenario I can think of where tax-cuts aren't a deficit to "the people." Am I missing something?
|
I think what club is trying to say is that he agrees with Bachmann's underlying, thematic, squint-and-it's-there point, which is fundamentally, it's my fucking money, not the government's. And, you know, we should cut spending, which is also a valid point.
Which is all fine, but it kinda gets lost in the nonsense of Bachmann's argument about tax cuts not being a deficit to the government, or something.
