LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 346
0 members and 346 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-03-2011, 08:27 PM   #4378
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
By "history" I take you to mean "legislative record," which is often misleadingly referred to as legislatively history. Because non-citizen Chinese laborers seem to be pretty spot-on "history" from the time.

Or do you prefer to believe that those who drafted the amendment were not aware of these laborers?
you're not normally as much a dickhead as GGG so I'll ask you once more- was their anything in the record of the amendment that explained what they were trying to do, or was it silent. I get the language seems to cover people who happen to be in the country and give birth, but was there any discussion as to whether that was intended to be covered?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 01-03-2011 at 08:44 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 AM.