LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 358
0 members and 358 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-03-2011, 08:57 PM   #4386
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
Hank, you seem to have something in mind. Do you want to tell us what it is, or is that too close to actually taking a position for you?

I will give you credit, though. You seem to have somewhat more sophisticated kinks than Sebby, what with the way you get off on having Adder google for you.
i'm stupid in a variety of categories, but con law is among the most severe, that's why I"m asking. you all seem really fixed on what the amendment was intended to do though so I thought maybe one of you had actual knowledge. unless your point is simply "congress doesn't write sloppy?"
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 AM.