LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 244
0 members and 244 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-04-2011, 12:37 PM   #11
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtclub View Post
Sorry, I have been busy preparing for the coup.

But please, will you stop posting this nonsense. The amount of debt that was amassed over the last two years is unprecedented. And I will bet any amount of money that Obamacare will not only not save money, it will cost 10x what they are predicting.
What provisions do you think are going to result in substantial government expense?

The one you might expect, broadening coverage, is modeled on a Massachusetts provision (Romneycare in your parlence) and budgetting was done with full knowledge of the outcomes there. Note that Romneycare has been slightly more expensive and slightly more successful in terms of expanding coverage than originally projected, but its overall costs, even without the fed's rate-setting voodoo, have been modest.

Absent that provision, I'm not sure where you think the cost overruns are going to be.
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 AM.