LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 357
0 members and 357 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-05-2011, 05:22 PM   #4627
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Re: Election 2010: Teabaggin' the Ds & Rs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cletus Miller View Post
I was under the (possibly? certainly? mistaken) impression that SS wouldn't be selling the bonds, but having them repaid. If they are actually going to be selling them on the open market, (1) they will recover less than face and (2) that will likely have some unexpected/unintended consequences.
When a given bond matures the SSTF can do one of two things. Take the cash or reinvest the cash in more bonds. Obviously the SSTF is doing this on a large scale with many bonds maturing at any given moment. So long as the SSTF has net income it will continue to invest in more tbills. Once it has net payments to make some bonds when they come due will go to SS payments.

But none of this is really relevant to anything--when the SSTF stops running a surplus, the deficit will grow even more rapidly and the government will need to finance that deficit spending by selling bonds in the market, which presumably will have whatever effects running a higher deficit will have.

In terms of government accounting, all this means is that the deficit will go up. I also imagine that we'll switch accounting so that there's a separate deficit that does not include the social security deficit and that will be the one cited by politicians.
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 AM.