Quote:
Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan
med knowledge
|
any advice- i have an Uncle looking at cancer treatment. A surgeon wants to cut, but Unc wants to get a second opinion*, which makes sense and we will do that. But I wonder how one weighs the second opinion- are they typically given fairly, or are they tinted by the economy of "wanting to get the file?"
like if I advise someone how we should sue someone, then they go to Firm B, firm B will almost certainly say my plan is screwed up. any evidence of that popping up in med circles?
* my entire knowledge base is the sopranos where Junior's surgeon really wanted to cut him, but he got a second opinion from an oncologist, which was the better advice.
