LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 125
0 members and 125 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-19-2011, 01:12 PM   #1541
Cletus Miller
the poor-man's spuckler
 
Cletus Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,997
Re: New Editorial Standards for WSJ!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidd Finch View Post
If it's really a "death tax", seems pretty logical to base it on the income of the decedent during the last year of life.
Sure. And then, assuming that upon death the decedent ceases to earn income (dunno if correct, Code-wise), if that person dies early enough in January, em might well have less than $20k in income and a taxable estate. And, for the basis of projections, and projecting ($47 less the benefit of reduced corporate tax) in benefits to however many million taxpayers, all you need is to assume one person per year has a taxable estate and less than $20k in income in em's last tax year.

Any projections made by either side are so full of BS that it's almost impossible to unpack. And projections related to inheritance tax are about the worst.
__________________
never incredibly annoying
Cletus Miller is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 PM.