LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 116
0 members and 116 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-22-2011, 05:49 PM   #7
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: We're always in the 1970s.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtclub View Post
They are from the CBO, which I referenced yesterday. Read much?
You may want to read your CBO report again. This is the Fox interpretation, already rebutted repeatedly.

It's acheived by looking at CBO (or CEA) numbers on total job impact of the bill by the total cost of bill, disregarding any secondary impact. Thus, something not designed to impact jobs, like additional unemployment benefits, is counted in the cost. Same with low impact programs, like the tax cuts that the Rs insisted on.

We expect better from you.
__________________
A wee dram a day!

Last edited by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy; 07-22-2011 at 05:53 PM..
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:28 PM.