Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder
You saw where I used the word "question," right? What does that word mean to you?
The administrations position has been no, they are not prisoners of war. I don't fully understand all of the implications, but personally, that status would seems to make a lot more sense to me.
|
But if "we are at war" so Obama can kill them it seems like "we were at war so bush could detain them." sidd will make the cogent point that torture isn't justofied. But you all gotta back peddle on the bush detainees were wrong thing
