LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 104
0 members and 104 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-06-2012, 01:20 PM   #1417
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: All hat, no cattle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
I'm sorry I bashed you. I think I speak for the entire board when I say that it would have been entertaining and edifying to see you attempt a constitutional attack on the individual mandate. But discretion is the better part of valor, and I can well understood why you would rather just keep ducking the question.
I don't usually reply to the same post twice, but given that all of you have said that Scalia could have no valid way to justify it, and given that you've all said that only politics gave rise to the challenge, any Circuit Court decision that has killed the law AND the only reason there is any possibility any of the Supremes is even considering killing it, what possible reason would anyone have for engaging you?

But, here, I'll tell you what Scalia can do, accepting all of your biases i list above: Scalia can over rule that tiny part of whatever decision you feel limits him here. And of course he will, because he is solely motivated by politics.

Any other questions?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 PM.