LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 105
0 members and 105 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-06-2012, 02:05 PM   #1423
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: All hat, no cattle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
I think you were being sarcastic, but if he does that, it will be very hard to understand as anything but political.
i was saying if you are right, and the only reason the whole argument wasn't thrown out as a 9-0 affirmance of the law (not even whether they are affirming 1 decision or contrary ones) is politics then why not throw out everything. You better hope your'e wrong about the 5 likely to kill this monster being solely politically motivated cuz if they are they can kill it despite precedent.

like in gore/Bush the Supreme's stole the sacred right to vote w/o justification, stopping the Godlike good work of all those fucked up Dems in florida. give me a fucking break.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 PM.