LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 187
0 members and 187 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-03-2012, 07:54 AM   #2293
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Pepper sprayed for public safety.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
No. The government can borrow. Bonds will have to be repaid, but not today.
Your gripe is with state austerity, yes? Explain how, say, CA, or IL, or FL, or any of the other states that desperately need capital, and are shit risks, can borrow cheaply.

If you're suggesting Uncle Sam can borrow cheap and give the money to them, explain who pays off the bonds down the road?

Here's your plan in a formula:

Borrow Cheap long term + [Something magical happens to the economy w/in 20 years] = Win/Win

This plan has already been used and abused to the point global long term debt obligations owed by most of the developed world are impossible to ever pay down. The next step is them becoming impossible to roll over at reasonable terms.

You can not indefinitely borrow your way to prosperity any more than you can tax yourself there. Read Stiglitz and Krugman closely and you'll see neither is a true, hard core advocate of more borrowing and stimulus. The bigger reason they're arguing for it now it is because we're at a point where we either buy time or run into a slowdown, which will put serious teeth on this depression. They're not intellectual advocates of increased govt spending so much as voices of dissent, saying, "If we keep on this road - this failed 'muddling through' - we're going to economically find ourselves, at least for at time, on something like Cormac McCarthy's Road." It's fear of the Austrian reckoning more than anything else, and truly, I understand it, and sympathize with it. But what is unsustainable will not be sustained. And your math, your academic somersaults, offered to suggest we can indebt ourselves out of debt, fall flat.

We either have upheaval, or a long, slow decline trying to prop up the status quo. I think the latter, but the former's looking more and more like a possibility.

ETA: The asset prices need to fall. Wealth needs to change hands. The disequilibrium between capital and labor has to correct. None of this happens without face-ripping creative destruction - the exact thing we've fought to avoid.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 07-03-2012 at 07:58 AM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 PM.