LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 188
0 members and 188 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-14-2012, 01:36 PM   #3971
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: While we are discussing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch View Post
I re-read the article. The question on the form was "whether [she] had ever been sexually assaulted." I continue to contend she has not, and that "clearly" she should not say so. She is free to say exactly what happened to whomever she likes, but saying she was sexually assaulted measured only by her feelings and not any failure of her sexual partner to obtain consent is a huge definitional gulf. I don't want women or men going around using the language of criminal law merely to vindicate their feelings, because they will leave more tragedies in their wake.
wasn't she asleep when he stuck it in? is lack of objection consent?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:42 PM.