Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Acidentially deleted my post.
She has the right response. For every dumb joker, there is a sicko capable of doing something. Security should focus on people who have been the subject of threats, especially this kind of sexually oriented harassment. This is not a bizarre response at all - it ought to be basic security.
|
Does this "basic security" rule you're proposing also extend to public property? Just curious. I think the situation is more complicating than you're considering.
ETA Not sure if you're agreeing with Adder that he should/could be barred from the event.
