LawTalkers
Forums
User Name
Remember Me?
Password
Register
FAQ
Calendar
Go to Page...
» Site Navigation
»
Homepage
»
Forums
»
Forum
>
User CP
>
FAQ
»
Online Users: 103
0 members and 103 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
»
Search Forums
»
Advanced Search
Thread
:
Pepper sprayed for public safety.
View Single Post
11-21-2012, 02:00 PM
#
4314
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: Gifts
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sebastian_dangerfield
Those aren't swing voters. Those are fools. If you think the GOP is going to flip
Roe
, you're nuts. The party that does that destroys its future. Even the idiots running the GOP know that's suicide. Hence, the GOP always manages to avoid putting an anti-
Roe
vote on the Court when it would matter. Every time it's been able to do so, it's put a strange moderate on the Court, who upholds
Roe's
essential premise.
And the contraception thing is just nonsense. Nobody's barring anyone from getting contraception. That's a media crafted wedge issue.
And Akin? He's an idiot, but unless you live in his state, who cares?
Regarding gay marriage, perhaps Romney would have been problematic. But I don't think so. He was such a vote whore I can't seem him doing anything but punting on the issue by saying, "It's a states' rights thing." Which is, given the way states are leaning on the issue, shrugging at inevitable across-the-nation legalization, state by state.
Immigration was the only social issue I see with which a rational, shrewd voter could find concern with the GOP. Romney would have to take a harsh line on that to placate the SW GOP voters, and right wingers in TX. That one would be a problem.
But generally, save immigration, in times like these, social issues are for whiffle voters... pliable, easily manipulated, emotional minds. The most frivolous of unserious voters. (Don't like that? I don't give a shit. If you aren't putting jobs and the economy above everything else - by miles - you're a nerf intellect, and I'd take any derision from you on the subject as a compliment.)
that those nuts jobs could say the stuff they said about abortion and gays and so many other things, made it clear they are fatally sick in the head. I tend to agree with you that the sane R's will never reverse Roe, but 1) there is a lot of shit they could do day to day against women, and their positions were so anti-women (and anti-gay) that you have to assume they'd slip a lot of shit in, or at least not consider the impact of laws, and 2) lots of these yokels are clearly not sane.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Hank Chinaski
Powered by
vBadvanced
CMPS v3.0.1
All times are GMT -4. The time now is
10:01 PM
.
-- LawTalk Forums vBulletin 3 Style
-- vBulletin 2 Default
-- Ravio_Blue
-- Ravio_Orange
Contact Us
-
Lawtalkers
-
Top
Powered by:
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By:
URLJet.com