Part II of Orin Kerr article out.
Is it wise for a defense attorney to write an article publicly trying and sentencing a defendent based on presumptions every fact in the indictment was true and complete and by making inferences from half digested old web postings? Wouldn't a defense attorney reading that manifesto focus on Aaron's language saying they should "buy" databases and post things out of copyright? I kind of think this one may come back to bite him.
That having been said, his discussion of Aaron's law is absolutely fascinating.
