LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 221
0 members and 221 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 03-21-2013, 04:04 PM   #1440
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: So

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
Agreed, but what significance does this hold? She was drunk because she drank too much, like 90% of kids her age inevitably do at some point in the growing-up process. Am I missing a point here?



If she wasn't passed out, or incoherent, she could have said no to having those fingers put inside her. Or she could have said yes. In either event, there'd be no crime. So your point is?



Am I understanding this? You seem to be suggesting the victim's life is potentially ruined because she was victimized? Well, I guess I understand that it would make some people uncomfortable around her to know what happened to her. But those people would be few. I mean, really, am I going to think badly of a woman who was sexually assaulted? No. It's illogical. I'd feel bad for her, and be cautious not to say things that might cause her to think about the incident. And am I going to think she contributed to it because she was drunk? Hell no. This is even more illogical.

She will feel embarrassed and humiliated by those photos. But I highly doubt she will suffer any negative scrutiny from people as a result of them.
I'm not going to bother with too much more. You suggested the posting on the internet was really of no moment. You are dead wrong- to her horror those will always be there.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 PM.